Comparison of a modified shell vial culture procedure with conventional mouse inoculation for rabies virus isolation

Rabies is a neurotropic disease that is often lethal. The early diagnosis of rabies infection is important and requires methods that allow for the isolation of the virus from animals and humans. The present study compared a modified shell vial (MSV) procedure using 24-well tissue culture plates with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María de los Angeles Ribas Antúnez, Blanca Girón, Iraima Monsalvez, Luis Morier, Gretel Acosta, Yahisel Tejero, Yanislet Cordero, Dainelyd Piedra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) 2013-04-01
Series:Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762013000200255&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1797721486727839744
author María de los Angeles Ribas Antúnez
Blanca Girón
Iraima Monsalvez
Luis Morier
Gretel Acosta
Yahisel Tejero
Yanislet Cordero
Dainelyd Piedra
author_facet María de los Angeles Ribas Antúnez
Blanca Girón
Iraima Monsalvez
Luis Morier
Gretel Acosta
Yahisel Tejero
Yanislet Cordero
Dainelyd Piedra
author_sort María de los Angeles Ribas Antúnez
collection DOAJ
description Rabies is a neurotropic disease that is often lethal. The early diagnosis of rabies infection is important and requires methods that allow for the isolation of the virus from animals and humans. The present study compared a modified shell vial (MSV) procedure using 24-well tissue culture plates with the mouse inoculation test (MIT), which is considered the gold standard for rabies virus isolation. Thirty brain samples (25 positive and 5 negative by the fluorescent antibody test) obtained from different animal species at the National Institute of Hygiene Rafael Rangel in Caracas, Venezuela, were studied by the MIT and MSV assays. Nine samples (36%) were positive at 24 h, 10 (40%) were positive at 48 h and six (24%) were positive at 72 h by the MSV assay. With the MIT assay, 76% were positive at six days post inoculation and 12% were positive at 12 and 18 days post inoculation. One sample that was negative according to the MSV assay was positive with MIT on the 12th day. The MSV procedure exhibited a sensitivity of 96.2%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value 80%. This procedure allowed for rapid rabies virus detection. MIT can be employed as an alternative method in laboratories without tissue culture facilities.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:34:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e6f9b92bb1b41bbbdc5e7b5a9d2e2fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-8060
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:34:00Z
publishDate 2013-04-01
publisher Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
record_format Article
series Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
spelling doaj.art-3e6f9b92bb1b41bbbdc5e7b5a9d2e2fb2023-09-02T13:48:53ZengFundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz1678-80602013-04-01108225525610.1590/0074-0276108022013023S0074-02762013000200255Comparison of a modified shell vial culture procedure with conventional mouse inoculation for rabies virus isolationMaría de los Angeles Ribas AntúnezBlanca GirónIraima MonsalvezLuis MorierGretel AcostaYahisel TejeroYanislet CorderoDainelyd PiedraRabies is a neurotropic disease that is often lethal. The early diagnosis of rabies infection is important and requires methods that allow for the isolation of the virus from animals and humans. The present study compared a modified shell vial (MSV) procedure using 24-well tissue culture plates with the mouse inoculation test (MIT), which is considered the gold standard for rabies virus isolation. Thirty brain samples (25 positive and 5 negative by the fluorescent antibody test) obtained from different animal species at the National Institute of Hygiene Rafael Rangel in Caracas, Venezuela, were studied by the MIT and MSV assays. Nine samples (36%) were positive at 24 h, 10 (40%) were positive at 48 h and six (24%) were positive at 72 h by the MSV assay. With the MIT assay, 76% were positive at six days post inoculation and 12% were positive at 12 and 18 days post inoculation. One sample that was negative according to the MSV assay was positive with MIT on the 12th day. The MSV procedure exhibited a sensitivity of 96.2%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value 80%. This procedure allowed for rapid rabies virus detection. MIT can be employed as an alternative method in laboratories without tissue culture facilities.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762013000200255&lng=en&tlng=enrabiesmodified shell vial proceduremouse inoculation
spellingShingle María de los Angeles Ribas Antúnez
Blanca Girón
Iraima Monsalvez
Luis Morier
Gretel Acosta
Yahisel Tejero
Yanislet Cordero
Dainelyd Piedra
Comparison of a modified shell vial culture procedure with conventional mouse inoculation for rabies virus isolation
Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
rabies
modified shell vial procedure
mouse inoculation
title Comparison of a modified shell vial culture procedure with conventional mouse inoculation for rabies virus isolation
title_full Comparison of a modified shell vial culture procedure with conventional mouse inoculation for rabies virus isolation
title_fullStr Comparison of a modified shell vial culture procedure with conventional mouse inoculation for rabies virus isolation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a modified shell vial culture procedure with conventional mouse inoculation for rabies virus isolation
title_short Comparison of a modified shell vial culture procedure with conventional mouse inoculation for rabies virus isolation
title_sort comparison of a modified shell vial culture procedure with conventional mouse inoculation for rabies virus isolation
topic rabies
modified shell vial procedure
mouse inoculation
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762013000200255&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT mariadelosangelesribasantunez comparisonofamodifiedshellvialcultureprocedurewithconventionalmouseinoculationforrabiesvirusisolation
AT blancagiron comparisonofamodifiedshellvialcultureprocedurewithconventionalmouseinoculationforrabiesvirusisolation
AT iraimamonsalvez comparisonofamodifiedshellvialcultureprocedurewithconventionalmouseinoculationforrabiesvirusisolation
AT luismorier comparisonofamodifiedshellvialcultureprocedurewithconventionalmouseinoculationforrabiesvirusisolation
AT gretelacosta comparisonofamodifiedshellvialcultureprocedurewithconventionalmouseinoculationforrabiesvirusisolation
AT yahiseltejero comparisonofamodifiedshellvialcultureprocedurewithconventionalmouseinoculationforrabiesvirusisolation
AT yanisletcordero comparisonofamodifiedshellvialcultureprocedurewithconventionalmouseinoculationforrabiesvirusisolation
AT dainelydpiedra comparisonofamodifiedshellvialcultureprocedurewithconventionalmouseinoculationforrabiesvirusisolation