CILFIT in Strasbourg
On 19 February 2024, the European Court of Human Rights decided not to answer the Estonian Supreme Court’s request for an advisory opinion on the basis of Protocol 16 (P16). For the first time, it dismissed a request because it did not concern a question of principle concerning the interpretation an...
Main Author: | Jasper Krommendijk |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/cilfit-in-strasbourg/ |
Similar Items
-
Globuli oder lebensrettende Behandlung? Zur Wirkung von Klimaklagen - Eine Replik auf Bernhard Wegener
by: Manuela Niehaus
Published: (2024-04-01) -
The First Italian Climate Judgement and the Separation of Powers - A Critical Assessment in Light of the ECtHR’s Climate Jurisprudence
by: Moritz Vinken, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
Konventionskonformität des Gesichtsbedeckungsverbots in der Öffentlichkeit
by: Beate Sündhofer
Published: (2015-04-01) -
Avoiding the Legacy of Impunity - Ireland lodges a new Inter-State case against the UK at the ECtHR over amnesty legislation ending investigations into the Northern Ireland conflict
by: Daniel Holder, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Gerichtshof ohne Beschwerdeführer
by: Romy Klimke