Reducing low-value radiological services in Norway –a qualitative multi-professional study on measures and facilitators for change

Abstract Background Overuse, underuse, and significant variation in the utilisation of radiological services are well documented in the literature. Several radiological examinations are identified as low-value examinations as they do not lead to a change in diagnosis or course of treatment. Even so,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eivind Richter Andersen, Bjørn Morten Hofmann, Elin Kjelle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-05-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08077-0
_version_ 1811248865349730304
author Eivind Richter Andersen
Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Elin Kjelle
author_facet Eivind Richter Andersen
Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Elin Kjelle
author_sort Eivind Richter Andersen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Overuse, underuse, and significant variation in the utilisation of radiological services are well documented in the literature. Several radiological examinations are identified as low-value examinations as they do not lead to a change in diagnosis or course of treatment. Even so, such examinations are frequently performed. Many measures for reducing low-value imaging have been carried out with variable outcomes. While there is little evidence as to why some measures work and others do not, adjusting to the context seems important for success. The objective of this study was to investigate which measures stakeholders consider appropriate for reducing the use of low-value imaging and what it takes to make them work. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted among radiographers, radiologists, radiological department managers, hospital clinicians, general practitioners, and health government/authorities’ representatives. The interview guide covered two broad areas: Experience with low-value services, and possible future measures deemed appropriate for reducing low-value services. Data were analysed in line with a qualitative framework analysis. Results The analysis included information from 27 participants. All participants acknowledged that low-value imaging was a problem, but few had very specific suggestions on reducing this in practice. Suggested measures were to stop referrals from being sent, provide support in assessing referrals, or change the healthcare system. Identified facilitators were categorised as management and resources, evidence, and experienced value. In general, appropriate measures should be practical, well-founded, and valuable. Conclusions This study provides insight into various stakeholders’ perceptions of suitable interventions to reduce low-value imaging. While many measures for reducing low-value imaging are available, contextual sensitivity is crucial to make them work.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T15:35:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e7bfdceb5e04909b3aca814704246c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T15:35:20Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-3e7bfdceb5e04909b3aca814704246c72022-12-22T03:26:58ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632022-05-0122111210.1186/s12913-022-08077-0Reducing low-value radiological services in Norway –a qualitative multi-professional study on measures and facilitators for changeEivind Richter Andersen0Bjørn Morten Hofmann1Elin Kjelle2Institute for the Health Sciences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at GjøvikInstitute for the Health Sciences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at GjøvikInstitute for the Health Sciences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at GjøvikAbstract Background Overuse, underuse, and significant variation in the utilisation of radiological services are well documented in the literature. Several radiological examinations are identified as low-value examinations as they do not lead to a change in diagnosis or course of treatment. Even so, such examinations are frequently performed. Many measures for reducing low-value imaging have been carried out with variable outcomes. While there is little evidence as to why some measures work and others do not, adjusting to the context seems important for success. The objective of this study was to investigate which measures stakeholders consider appropriate for reducing the use of low-value imaging and what it takes to make them work. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted among radiographers, radiologists, radiological department managers, hospital clinicians, general practitioners, and health government/authorities’ representatives. The interview guide covered two broad areas: Experience with low-value services, and possible future measures deemed appropriate for reducing low-value services. Data were analysed in line with a qualitative framework analysis. Results The analysis included information from 27 participants. All participants acknowledged that low-value imaging was a problem, but few had very specific suggestions on reducing this in practice. Suggested measures were to stop referrals from being sent, provide support in assessing referrals, or change the healthcare system. Identified facilitators were categorised as management and resources, evidence, and experienced value. In general, appropriate measures should be practical, well-founded, and valuable. Conclusions This study provides insight into various stakeholders’ perceptions of suitable interventions to reduce low-value imaging. While many measures for reducing low-value imaging are available, contextual sensitivity is crucial to make them work.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08077-0Low-value imagingDiagnostic imagingHealth services misusede-implementation
spellingShingle Eivind Richter Andersen
Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Elin Kjelle
Reducing low-value radiological services in Norway –a qualitative multi-professional study on measures and facilitators for change
BMC Health Services Research
Low-value imaging
Diagnostic imaging
Health services misuse
de-implementation
title Reducing low-value radiological services in Norway –a qualitative multi-professional study on measures and facilitators for change
title_full Reducing low-value radiological services in Norway –a qualitative multi-professional study on measures and facilitators for change
title_fullStr Reducing low-value radiological services in Norway –a qualitative multi-professional study on measures and facilitators for change
title_full_unstemmed Reducing low-value radiological services in Norway –a qualitative multi-professional study on measures and facilitators for change
title_short Reducing low-value radiological services in Norway –a qualitative multi-professional study on measures and facilitators for change
title_sort reducing low value radiological services in norway a qualitative multi professional study on measures and facilitators for change
topic Low-value imaging
Diagnostic imaging
Health services misuse
de-implementation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08077-0
work_keys_str_mv AT eivindrichterandersen reducinglowvalueradiologicalservicesinnorwayaqualitativemultiprofessionalstudyonmeasuresandfacilitatorsforchange
AT bjørnmortenhofmann reducinglowvalueradiologicalservicesinnorwayaqualitativemultiprofessionalstudyonmeasuresandfacilitatorsforchange
AT elinkjelle reducinglowvalueradiologicalservicesinnorwayaqualitativemultiprofessionalstudyonmeasuresandfacilitatorsforchange