Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelinesfor Chagas disease

INTRODUCTION: The development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) has increased; this study aimed to assess the quality of CPGs for the management of Chagas disease. METHODS: Following a systematic search of the scientific literature, two reviewers assessed the eligible guidelines using the Appra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mario Javier Olivera, Johana Alexandra Fory, Antonio José Olivera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) 2015-06-01
Series:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822015000300343&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811246101932539904
author Mario Javier Olivera
Johana Alexandra Fory
Antonio José Olivera
author_facet Mario Javier Olivera
Johana Alexandra Fory
Antonio José Olivera
author_sort Mario Javier Olivera
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION: The development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) has increased; this study aimed to assess the quality of CPGs for the management of Chagas disease. METHODS: Following a systematic search of the scientific literature, two reviewers assessed the eligible guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. RESULTS: Five CPGs were included. The AGREE domains of scope/purpose, stakeholder involvement, and clarity of presentation were rated well, and the domains of applicability and editorial independence received poor ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of CPGs for Chagas disease is poor, and significant work is required to develop high-quality guidelines.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T14:48:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3e82c8f3287543c3a65abc4f614e526b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-9849
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T14:48:49Z
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
record_format Article
series Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
spelling doaj.art-3e82c8f3287543c3a65abc4f614e526b2022-12-22T03:28:33ZengSociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical1678-98492015-06-0148334334610.1590/0037-8682-0251-2014S0037-86822015000300343Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelinesfor Chagas diseaseMario Javier OliveraJohana Alexandra ForyAntonio José OliveraINTRODUCTION: The development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) has increased; this study aimed to assess the quality of CPGs for the management of Chagas disease. METHODS: Following a systematic search of the scientific literature, two reviewers assessed the eligible guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. RESULTS: Five CPGs were included. The AGREE domains of scope/purpose, stakeholder involvement, and clarity of presentation were rated well, and the domains of applicability and editorial independence received poor ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of CPGs for Chagas disease is poor, and significant work is required to develop high-quality guidelines.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822015000300343&lng=en&tlng=enChagas diseaseClinical Practice GuidelinesAGREE
spellingShingle Mario Javier Olivera
Johana Alexandra Fory
Antonio José Olivera
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelinesfor Chagas disease
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
Chagas disease
Clinical Practice Guidelines
AGREE
title Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelinesfor Chagas disease
title_full Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelinesfor Chagas disease
title_fullStr Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelinesfor Chagas disease
title_full_unstemmed Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelinesfor Chagas disease
title_short Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelinesfor Chagas disease
title_sort quality assessment of clinical practice guidelinesfor chagas disease
topic Chagas disease
Clinical Practice Guidelines
AGREE
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822015000300343&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT mariojavierolivera qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforchagasdisease
AT johanaalexandrafory qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforchagasdisease
AT antoniojoseolivera qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforchagasdisease