Techno-economic and GHG mitigation assessment of concentrated solar thermal and PV systems for different climate zones
In this study, energy production by two solar energy technologies, namely concentrated solar power (CSP) and photovoltaic (PV) power, is compared from a technical, economic and environmental perspective. Initially, a 50 MW CSP plant is modeled and simulated at four selected sites in Pakistan. Then,...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Energy Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484723003463 |
| _version_ | 1827902683171782656 |
|---|---|
| author | Asad Ullah Mariam Mahmood Sheeraz Iqbal Muhammad Bilal Sajid Zohaib Hassan Kareem M. AboRas Hossam Kotb Mokhtar Shouran Bdereddin Abdul Samad |
| author_facet | Asad Ullah Mariam Mahmood Sheeraz Iqbal Muhammad Bilal Sajid Zohaib Hassan Kareem M. AboRas Hossam Kotb Mokhtar Shouran Bdereddin Abdul Samad |
| author_sort | Asad Ullah |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this study, energy production by two solar energy technologies, namely concentrated solar power (CSP) and photovoltaic (PV) power, is compared from a technical, economic and environmental perspective. Initially, a 50 MW CSP plant is modeled and simulated at four selected sites in Pakistan. Then, the most feasible location of the CSP plant is compared with the solar PV plant of the same capacity. The effect of the solar thermal storage size and cooling system of the CSP system is investigated, while the photovoltaic tracking system is investigated to evaluate the technical and economic performance of the power plants. Technical performance is evaluated based on energy generation and capacity factors metrics, while economic performance is evaluated with respect to levelized cost, payback period and net present value. In addition, environmental criteria such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), saving fossil fuels, and life-cycle water consumption are evaluated. From the results, it was concluded that the CSP plant located in Quetta is technically and economically viable. The capacity factor of the CSP plant is 36.6% compared to 19.8% for the PV plant, while the solar-to-electrical efficiency of the CSP plant is 14.2% compared to 20.8% for the PV plant. The required land area is 2.77 acres/GWh for the CSP plant and 2.33 acres/GWh for the PV plant, while the net capital cost of the CSP plant is five times higher than that of the PV plant. Various design parameters are optimized to obtain the minimum levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for both CSP and PV plants. The results of CSP and PV plants indicate that the LCOE can be reduced to 11.57 cents/kWh and 4.69 cents/kWh, respectively. Thus, the CSP plant performs better from the technical point of view while the PV plant performs better from the economic perspective. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T00:02:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3e988c1cd374465f9bb3fb1e51072bb8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2352-4847 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T00:02:43Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energy Reports |
| spelling | doaj.art-3e988c1cd374465f9bb3fb1e51072bb82023-07-13T05:29:53ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472023-12-01947634780Techno-economic and GHG mitigation assessment of concentrated solar thermal and PV systems for different climate zonesAsad Ullah0Mariam Mahmood1Sheeraz Iqbal2Muhammad Bilal Sajid3Zohaib Hassan4Kareem M. AboRas5Hossam Kotb6Mokhtar Shouran7Bdereddin Abdul Samad8U.S-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Energy (USPCAS-E), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, PakistanU.S-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Energy (USPCAS-E), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, PakistanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad 13100, AJK, PakistanU.S-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Energy (USPCAS-E), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, PakistanU.S-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Energy (USPCAS-E), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, PakistanDepartment of Electrical power and machine Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptDepartment of Electrical power and machine Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptMagnetics and Materials Research Group, School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UKMagnetics and Materials Research Group, School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; Corresponding author.In this study, energy production by two solar energy technologies, namely concentrated solar power (CSP) and photovoltaic (PV) power, is compared from a technical, economic and environmental perspective. Initially, a 50 MW CSP plant is modeled and simulated at four selected sites in Pakistan. Then, the most feasible location of the CSP plant is compared with the solar PV plant of the same capacity. The effect of the solar thermal storage size and cooling system of the CSP system is investigated, while the photovoltaic tracking system is investigated to evaluate the technical and economic performance of the power plants. Technical performance is evaluated based on energy generation and capacity factors metrics, while economic performance is evaluated with respect to levelized cost, payback period and net present value. In addition, environmental criteria such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), saving fossil fuels, and life-cycle water consumption are evaluated. From the results, it was concluded that the CSP plant located in Quetta is technically and economically viable. The capacity factor of the CSP plant is 36.6% compared to 19.8% for the PV plant, while the solar-to-electrical efficiency of the CSP plant is 14.2% compared to 20.8% for the PV plant. The required land area is 2.77 acres/GWh for the CSP plant and 2.33 acres/GWh for the PV plant, while the net capital cost of the CSP plant is five times higher than that of the PV plant. Various design parameters are optimized to obtain the minimum levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for both CSP and PV plants. The results of CSP and PV plants indicate that the LCOE can be reduced to 11.57 cents/kWh and 4.69 cents/kWh, respectively. Thus, the CSP plant performs better from the technical point of view while the PV plant performs better from the economic perspective.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484723003463Solar PVConcentrated solar powerTechno-economic assessmentSensitivityEnvironmental sustainability |
| spellingShingle | Asad Ullah Mariam Mahmood Sheeraz Iqbal Muhammad Bilal Sajid Zohaib Hassan Kareem M. AboRas Hossam Kotb Mokhtar Shouran Bdereddin Abdul Samad Techno-economic and GHG mitigation assessment of concentrated solar thermal and PV systems for different climate zones Energy Reports Solar PV Concentrated solar power Techno-economic assessment Sensitivity Environmental sustainability |
| title | Techno-economic and GHG mitigation assessment of concentrated solar thermal and PV systems for different climate zones |
| title_full | Techno-economic and GHG mitigation assessment of concentrated solar thermal and PV systems for different climate zones |
| title_fullStr | Techno-economic and GHG mitigation assessment of concentrated solar thermal and PV systems for different climate zones |
| title_full_unstemmed | Techno-economic and GHG mitigation assessment of concentrated solar thermal and PV systems for different climate zones |
| title_short | Techno-economic and GHG mitigation assessment of concentrated solar thermal and PV systems for different climate zones |
| title_sort | techno economic and ghg mitigation assessment of concentrated solar thermal and pv systems for different climate zones |
| topic | Solar PV Concentrated solar power Techno-economic assessment Sensitivity Environmental sustainability |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484723003463 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT asadullah technoeconomicandghgmitigationassessmentofconcentratedsolarthermalandpvsystemsfordifferentclimatezones AT mariammahmood technoeconomicandghgmitigationassessmentofconcentratedsolarthermalandpvsystemsfordifferentclimatezones AT sheeraziqbal technoeconomicandghgmitigationassessmentofconcentratedsolarthermalandpvsystemsfordifferentclimatezones AT muhammadbilalsajid technoeconomicandghgmitigationassessmentofconcentratedsolarthermalandpvsystemsfordifferentclimatezones AT zohaibhassan technoeconomicandghgmitigationassessmentofconcentratedsolarthermalandpvsystemsfordifferentclimatezones AT kareemmaboras technoeconomicandghgmitigationassessmentofconcentratedsolarthermalandpvsystemsfordifferentclimatezones AT hossamkotb technoeconomicandghgmitigationassessmentofconcentratedsolarthermalandpvsystemsfordifferentclimatezones AT mokhtarshouran technoeconomicandghgmitigationassessmentofconcentratedsolarthermalandpvsystemsfordifferentclimatezones AT bdereddinabdulsamad technoeconomicandghgmitigationassessmentofconcentratedsolarthermalandpvsystemsfordifferentclimatezones |