Microbial activity responses to water stress in agricultural soils from simple and complex crop rotations

<p>Increasing climatic pressures such as drought and flooding challenge agricultural systems and their management globally. How agricultural soils respond to soil water extremes will influence biogeochemical cycles of carbon and nitrogen in these systems. We investigated the response of soils...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Schnecker, D. B. Meeden, F. Calderon, M. Cavigelli, R. M. Lehman, L. K. Tiemann, A. S. Grandy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-08-01
Series:SOIL
Online Access:https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/7/547/2021/soil-7-547-2021.pdf
_version_ 1818596765009444864
author J. Schnecker
D. B. Meeden
F. Calderon
M. Cavigelli
R. M. Lehman
L. K. Tiemann
A. S. Grandy
author_facet J. Schnecker
D. B. Meeden
F. Calderon
M. Cavigelli
R. M. Lehman
L. K. Tiemann
A. S. Grandy
author_sort J. Schnecker
collection DOAJ
description <p>Increasing climatic pressures such as drought and flooding challenge agricultural systems and their management globally. How agricultural soils respond to soil water extremes will influence biogeochemical cycles of carbon and nitrogen in these systems. We investigated the response of soils from long-term agricultural field sites under varying crop rotational complexity to either drought or flooding stress. Focusing on these contrasting stressors separately, we investigated soil heterotrophic respiration during single and repeated stress cycles in soils from four different sites along a precipitation gradient (Colorado, MAP 421 mm; South Dakota, MAP 580 mm; Michigan, MAP 893 mm; Maryland, MAP 1192 mm); each site had two crop rotational complexity treatments. At the driest (Colorado) and wettest (Maryland) of these sites, we also analyzed microbial biomass, six potential enzyme activities, and N<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>O production during and after individual and repeated stress cycles. In general, we found site specific responses to soil water extremes, irrespective of crop rotational complexity and precipitation history. Drought usually caused more severe changes in respiration rates and potential enzyme activities than flooding. All soils returned to control levels for most measured parameters as soon as soils returned to control water levels following drought or flood stress, suggesting that the investigated soils were highly resilient to the applied stresses. The lack of sustained responses following the removal of the stressors may be because they are well in the range of natural in situ soil water fluctuations at the investigated sites. Without the inclusion of plants in our experiment, we found that irrespective of crop rotation complexity, soil and microbial properties in the investigated agricultural soils were more resistant to flooding but highly resilient to drought and flooding during single or repeated stress pulses.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:37:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3ea98a9b419c4c7ca2594d26108e84e0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2199-3971
2199-398X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:37:06Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series SOIL
spelling doaj.art-3ea98a9b419c4c7ca2594d26108e84e02022-12-21T22:33:03ZengCopernicus PublicationsSOIL2199-39712199-398X2021-08-01754756110.5194/soil-7-547-2021Microbial activity responses to water stress in agricultural soils from simple and complex crop rotationsJ. Schnecker0D. B. Meeden1F. Calderon2M. Cavigelli3R. M. Lehman4L. K. Tiemann5A. S. Grandy6Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, AustriaDepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USACollege of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97333, USASustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705, USANorth Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Brookings, SD 57006, USADepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USADepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA<p>Increasing climatic pressures such as drought and flooding challenge agricultural systems and their management globally. How agricultural soils respond to soil water extremes will influence biogeochemical cycles of carbon and nitrogen in these systems. We investigated the response of soils from long-term agricultural field sites under varying crop rotational complexity to either drought or flooding stress. Focusing on these contrasting stressors separately, we investigated soil heterotrophic respiration during single and repeated stress cycles in soils from four different sites along a precipitation gradient (Colorado, MAP 421 mm; South Dakota, MAP 580 mm; Michigan, MAP 893 mm; Maryland, MAP 1192 mm); each site had two crop rotational complexity treatments. At the driest (Colorado) and wettest (Maryland) of these sites, we also analyzed microbial biomass, six potential enzyme activities, and N<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2</sub></span>O production during and after individual and repeated stress cycles. In general, we found site specific responses to soil water extremes, irrespective of crop rotational complexity and precipitation history. Drought usually caused more severe changes in respiration rates and potential enzyme activities than flooding. All soils returned to control levels for most measured parameters as soon as soils returned to control water levels following drought or flood stress, suggesting that the investigated soils were highly resilient to the applied stresses. The lack of sustained responses following the removal of the stressors may be because they are well in the range of natural in situ soil water fluctuations at the investigated sites. Without the inclusion of plants in our experiment, we found that irrespective of crop rotation complexity, soil and microbial properties in the investigated agricultural soils were more resistant to flooding but highly resilient to drought and flooding during single or repeated stress pulses.</p>https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/7/547/2021/soil-7-547-2021.pdf
spellingShingle J. Schnecker
D. B. Meeden
F. Calderon
M. Cavigelli
R. M. Lehman
L. K. Tiemann
A. S. Grandy
Microbial activity responses to water stress in agricultural soils from simple and complex crop rotations
SOIL
title Microbial activity responses to water stress in agricultural soils from simple and complex crop rotations
title_full Microbial activity responses to water stress in agricultural soils from simple and complex crop rotations
title_fullStr Microbial activity responses to water stress in agricultural soils from simple and complex crop rotations
title_full_unstemmed Microbial activity responses to water stress in agricultural soils from simple and complex crop rotations
title_short Microbial activity responses to water stress in agricultural soils from simple and complex crop rotations
title_sort microbial activity responses to water stress in agricultural soils from simple and complex crop rotations
url https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/7/547/2021/soil-7-547-2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jschnecker microbialactivityresponsestowaterstressinagriculturalsoilsfromsimpleandcomplexcroprotations
AT dbmeeden microbialactivityresponsestowaterstressinagriculturalsoilsfromsimpleandcomplexcroprotations
AT fcalderon microbialactivityresponsestowaterstressinagriculturalsoilsfromsimpleandcomplexcroprotations
AT mcavigelli microbialactivityresponsestowaterstressinagriculturalsoilsfromsimpleandcomplexcroprotations
AT rmlehman microbialactivityresponsestowaterstressinagriculturalsoilsfromsimpleandcomplexcroprotations
AT lktiemann microbialactivityresponsestowaterstressinagriculturalsoilsfromsimpleandcomplexcroprotations
AT asgrandy microbialactivityresponsestowaterstressinagriculturalsoilsfromsimpleandcomplexcroprotations