Efficiency, Profitability and Carbon Footprint of Different Management Programs under No-Till to Control Herbicide Resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i>

The present work examines the effects of different integrated weed management (IWM) programs on multiple herbicide-resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i> populations in terms of effectiveness, profitability and carbon footprint. With this aim a trial was established in a winter cereal field und...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jordi Recasens, Aritz Royo-Esnal, Francisco Valencia-Gredilla, Joel Torra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Plants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/4/433
_version_ 1797571803052244992
author Jordi Recasens
Aritz Royo-Esnal
Francisco Valencia-Gredilla
Joel Torra
author_facet Jordi Recasens
Aritz Royo-Esnal
Francisco Valencia-Gredilla
Joel Torra
author_sort Jordi Recasens
collection DOAJ
description The present work examines the effects of different integrated weed management (IWM) programs on multiple herbicide-resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i> populations in terms of effectiveness, profitability and carbon footprint. With this aim a trial was established in a winter cereal field under no-till in North-Eastern Spain during three consecutive seasons. Four IWM programs with different intensification levels, from less (crop rotation, mechanical control, and no herbicides) to more intense (wheat monoculture with high chemical inputs), were established. The different strategies integrated in the four programs were efficient in managing the weed after three years, with increased effectiveness after management program intensification. Whereas low input program (which includes fallow season) represented less economic cost than the other programs, on average, no differences were observed on carbon foot print, considered as kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq kg<sup>−1</sup> product, between the different programs, except in the crop rotation program due to the low pea yield obtained. The results from this study show that in the search for a balance between crop profitability and reduction of the carbon footprint while controlling an herbicide resistant population is challenging, and particularly under no-till. In this scenario the short term priority should be to reduce the presence of multiple herbicide resistant biotypes integrating the different available chemical, cultural, and physical strategies.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:45:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3eaa99aea40343109a923a0ad3f0aeb0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2223-7747
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:45:48Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Plants
spelling doaj.art-3eaa99aea40343109a923a0ad3f0aeb02023-11-19T20:19:19ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472020-04-019443310.3390/plants9040433Efficiency, Profitability and Carbon Footprint of Different Management Programs under No-Till to Control Herbicide Resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i>Jordi Recasens0Aritz Royo-Esnal1Francisco Valencia-Gredilla2Joel Torra3Departament d’Hortofructicultura, Botànica i Jardineria, Agrotecnio, Universitat de Lleida, Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, SpainDepartament d’Hortofructicultura, Botànica i Jardineria, Agrotecnio, Universitat de Lleida, Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, SpainDepartament d’Hortofructicultura, Botànica i Jardineria, Agrotecnio, Universitat de Lleida, Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, SpainDepartament d’Hortofructicultura, Botànica i Jardineria, Agrotecnio, Universitat de Lleida, Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, SpainThe present work examines the effects of different integrated weed management (IWM) programs on multiple herbicide-resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i> populations in terms of effectiveness, profitability and carbon footprint. With this aim a trial was established in a winter cereal field under no-till in North-Eastern Spain during three consecutive seasons. Four IWM programs with different intensification levels, from less (crop rotation, mechanical control, and no herbicides) to more intense (wheat monoculture with high chemical inputs), were established. The different strategies integrated in the four programs were efficient in managing the weed after three years, with increased effectiveness after management program intensification. Whereas low input program (which includes fallow season) represented less economic cost than the other programs, on average, no differences were observed on carbon foot print, considered as kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq kg<sup>−1</sup> product, between the different programs, except in the crop rotation program due to the low pea yield obtained. The results from this study show that in the search for a balance between crop profitability and reduction of the carbon footprint while controlling an herbicide resistant population is challenging, and particularly under no-till. In this scenario the short term priority should be to reduce the presence of multiple herbicide resistant biotypes integrating the different available chemical, cultural, and physical strategies.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/4/433integrated weed managementwinter cerealpoppyenvironmental impacteconomic cost
spellingShingle Jordi Recasens
Aritz Royo-Esnal
Francisco Valencia-Gredilla
Joel Torra
Efficiency, Profitability and Carbon Footprint of Different Management Programs under No-Till to Control Herbicide Resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i>
Plants
integrated weed management
winter cereal
poppy
environmental impact
economic cost
title Efficiency, Profitability and Carbon Footprint of Different Management Programs under No-Till to Control Herbicide Resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i>
title_full Efficiency, Profitability and Carbon Footprint of Different Management Programs under No-Till to Control Herbicide Resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i>
title_fullStr Efficiency, Profitability and Carbon Footprint of Different Management Programs under No-Till to Control Herbicide Resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i>
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency, Profitability and Carbon Footprint of Different Management Programs under No-Till to Control Herbicide Resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i>
title_short Efficiency, Profitability and Carbon Footprint of Different Management Programs under No-Till to Control Herbicide Resistant <i>Papaver rhoeas</i>
title_sort efficiency profitability and carbon footprint of different management programs under no till to control herbicide resistant i papaver rhoeas i
topic integrated weed management
winter cereal
poppy
environmental impact
economic cost
url https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/4/433
work_keys_str_mv AT jordirecasens efficiencyprofitabilityandcarbonfootprintofdifferentmanagementprogramsundernotilltocontrolherbicideresistantipapaverrhoeasi
AT aritzroyoesnal efficiencyprofitabilityandcarbonfootprintofdifferentmanagementprogramsundernotilltocontrolherbicideresistantipapaverrhoeasi
AT franciscovalenciagredilla efficiencyprofitabilityandcarbonfootprintofdifferentmanagementprogramsundernotilltocontrolherbicideresistantipapaverrhoeasi
AT joeltorra efficiencyprofitabilityandcarbonfootprintofdifferentmanagementprogramsundernotilltocontrolherbicideresistantipapaverrhoeasi