Att se historien på nytt

The idea that there was a process of ”scientificisation” of historical research and writing in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries is largely undisputed. Yet, as influential meta-historical analyses such as Droysen’s lectures on Historik make clear, there was no experience of consens...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Braw
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Lärdomshistoriska samfundet 2009-01-01
Series:Lychnos
Online Access:https://tidskriftenlychnos.se/article/view/21419
_version_ 1797791021726171136
author Daniel Braw
author_facet Daniel Braw
author_sort Daniel Braw
collection DOAJ
description The idea that there was a process of ”scientificisation” of historical research and writing in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries is largely undisputed. Yet, as influential meta-historical analyses such as Droysen’s lectures on Historik make clear, there was no experience of consensus concerning the meaning and nature of ”scientific history”. Different kinds of interests – political, religious, existential – were integrated in the study of history, and led to a variety of approaches and ideals. In this article, one of the most influential of these approaches, that of Leopold Ranke (1795–1886) is outlined. While it has been a commonplace assumption among commentators that Ranke’s study of history amounted to a search for God or ”divine ideas”, there is little support for this notion in Ranke’s works. Using Ranke’s Französische Geschichte as example, the article attempts to develop a new interpretation of the interests and intentions that shaped Ranke’s approach to history. The starting point of this interpretation is Count Yorck’s observation that Ranke’s works are characterised by their ”ocularity”, that is, the contemplation of the past as a spectacle. For Ranke, the past was, above all, life; and his attempts at innovation in terms of research, writing, and overall attitude towards the past might all be seen as parts of the same effort to capture and communicate as much of this life as possible. Although this effort had little to do with theology, it nevertheless had an existential significance: by widening the circle in which life in the present was lived, the human existence gained new depth and intensity. His- tory, in this way, contributed to ”the perfection of the human mind” (Ranke).
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:12:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3eb38f1a4dbf4d77a1501a0a4cfc982b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0076-1648
2004-4852
language Danish
last_indexed 2024-03-13T02:12:51Z
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher Lärdomshistoriska samfundet
record_format Article
series Lychnos
spelling doaj.art-3eb38f1a4dbf4d77a1501a0a4cfc982b2023-06-30T19:34:22ZdanLärdomshistoriska samfundetLychnos0076-16482004-48522009-01-01Att se historien på nyttDaniel Braw0University College, London University The idea that there was a process of ”scientificisation” of historical research and writing in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries is largely undisputed. Yet, as influential meta-historical analyses such as Droysen’s lectures on Historik make clear, there was no experience of consensus concerning the meaning and nature of ”scientific history”. Different kinds of interests – political, religious, existential – were integrated in the study of history, and led to a variety of approaches and ideals. In this article, one of the most influential of these approaches, that of Leopold Ranke (1795–1886) is outlined. While it has been a commonplace assumption among commentators that Ranke’s study of history amounted to a search for God or ”divine ideas”, there is little support for this notion in Ranke’s works. Using Ranke’s Französische Geschichte as example, the article attempts to develop a new interpretation of the interests and intentions that shaped Ranke’s approach to history. The starting point of this interpretation is Count Yorck’s observation that Ranke’s works are characterised by their ”ocularity”, that is, the contemplation of the past as a spectacle. For Ranke, the past was, above all, life; and his attempts at innovation in terms of research, writing, and overall attitude towards the past might all be seen as parts of the same effort to capture and communicate as much of this life as possible. Although this effort had little to do with theology, it nevertheless had an existential significance: by widening the circle in which life in the present was lived, the human existence gained new depth and intensity. His- tory, in this way, contributed to ”the perfection of the human mind” (Ranke). https://tidskriftenlychnos.se/article/view/21419
spellingShingle Daniel Braw
Att se historien på nytt
Lychnos
title Att se historien på nytt
title_full Att se historien på nytt
title_fullStr Att se historien på nytt
title_full_unstemmed Att se historien på nytt
title_short Att se historien på nytt
title_sort att se historien pa nytt
url https://tidskriftenlychnos.se/article/view/21419
work_keys_str_mv AT danielbraw attsehistorienpanytt