Seismic Response of Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges under Near-Fault Ground Motions, Including Soil–Structure Interaction

Studies on the seismic response of skewed integral abutment bridges have mainly focused on response under far-field non-pulse-type ground motions, yet the large amplitude and long-period velocity pulses in near-fault ground motions might have significant impacts on bridge seismic response. In this s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiuhong Zhao, Shuo Dong, Qingwei Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/7/3217
_version_ 1797538886640992256
author Qiuhong Zhao
Shuo Dong
Qingwei Wang
author_facet Qiuhong Zhao
Shuo Dong
Qingwei Wang
author_sort Qiuhong Zhao
collection DOAJ
description Studies on the seismic response of skewed integral abutment bridges have mainly focused on response under far-field non-pulse-type ground motions, yet the large amplitude and long-period velocity pulses in near-fault ground motions might have significant impacts on bridge seismic response. In this study, the nonlinear dynamic response of an skewed integral abutment bridge (SIAB) under near-fault pulse and far-fault non-pulse type ground motions are analyzed considering the soil–structure interaction, along with parametric studies on bridge skew angle and compactness of abutment backfill. For the analyses, three sets of near-fault pulse ground motion records are selected based on the bridge site conditions, and three corresponding far-field non-pulse artificial records are fitted by their acceleration response spectra. The results show that the near-fault pulse type ground motions are generally more destructive than the non-pulse motions on the nonlinear dynamic response of SIABs, but the presence of abutment backfill will mitigate the pulse effects to some extent. Coupling of the longitudinal and transverse displacements as well as rotation of the bridge deck would increase with the skew angle, and so do the internal forces of steel H piles. The influence of the skew angle would be most obvious when the abutment backfill is densely compacted.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:37:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3eb9ca79b36348a99f3bd52b18144c8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:37:33Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-3eb9ca79b36348a99f3bd52b18144c8d2023-11-21T14:08:24ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-04-01117321710.3390/app11073217Seismic Response of Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges under Near-Fault Ground Motions, Including Soil–Structure InteractionQiuhong Zhao0Shuo Dong1Qingwei Wang2School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, ChinaStudies on the seismic response of skewed integral abutment bridges have mainly focused on response under far-field non-pulse-type ground motions, yet the large amplitude and long-period velocity pulses in near-fault ground motions might have significant impacts on bridge seismic response. In this study, the nonlinear dynamic response of an skewed integral abutment bridge (SIAB) under near-fault pulse and far-fault non-pulse type ground motions are analyzed considering the soil–structure interaction, along with parametric studies on bridge skew angle and compactness of abutment backfill. For the analyses, three sets of near-fault pulse ground motion records are selected based on the bridge site conditions, and three corresponding far-field non-pulse artificial records are fitted by their acceleration response spectra. The results show that the near-fault pulse type ground motions are generally more destructive than the non-pulse motions on the nonlinear dynamic response of SIABs, but the presence of abutment backfill will mitigate the pulse effects to some extent. Coupling of the longitudinal and transverse displacements as well as rotation of the bridge deck would increase with the skew angle, and so do the internal forces of steel H piles. The influence of the skew angle would be most obvious when the abutment backfill is densely compacted.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/7/3217skewed integral abutment bridgesnear-fault ground motionssoil–structure interactionskew anglebackfill compactness
spellingShingle Qiuhong Zhao
Shuo Dong
Qingwei Wang
Seismic Response of Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges under Near-Fault Ground Motions, Including Soil–Structure Interaction
Applied Sciences
skewed integral abutment bridges
near-fault ground motions
soil–structure interaction
skew angle
backfill compactness
title Seismic Response of Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges under Near-Fault Ground Motions, Including Soil–Structure Interaction
title_full Seismic Response of Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges under Near-Fault Ground Motions, Including Soil–Structure Interaction
title_fullStr Seismic Response of Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges under Near-Fault Ground Motions, Including Soil–Structure Interaction
title_full_unstemmed Seismic Response of Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges under Near-Fault Ground Motions, Including Soil–Structure Interaction
title_short Seismic Response of Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges under Near-Fault Ground Motions, Including Soil–Structure Interaction
title_sort seismic response of skewed integral abutment bridges under near fault ground motions including soil structure interaction
topic skewed integral abutment bridges
near-fault ground motions
soil–structure interaction
skew angle
backfill compactness
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/7/3217
work_keys_str_mv AT qiuhongzhao seismicresponseofskewedintegralabutmentbridgesundernearfaultgroundmotionsincludingsoilstructureinteraction
AT shuodong seismicresponseofskewedintegralabutmentbridgesundernearfaultgroundmotionsincludingsoilstructureinteraction
AT qingweiwang seismicresponseofskewedintegralabutmentbridgesundernearfaultgroundmotionsincludingsoilstructureinteraction