Recruiting and Preparing Undergraduate Students for a Collegiate Debate: An HBCU Case Study

The benefits of debate as an effective pedagogical tool in higher education are well-published. It fosters students’ development of critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, and communication skills. This paper describes a conceptual model of debate categories: in-class debate, co-curricular deb...

Descrizione completa

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: LaShawn Wordlaw, Kevin J. Harrell, LaHoma Smith Romocki
Natura: Articolo
Lingua:English
Pubblicazione: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Serie:Frontiers in Education
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.562328/full
Descrizione
Riassunto:The benefits of debate as an effective pedagogical tool in higher education are well-published. It fosters students’ development of critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, and communication skills. This paper describes a conceptual model of debate categories: in-class debate, co-curricular debate, and tournament debate. It proposes six levels of debate for faculty to employ to create engaged active learning experiences. It is a case study written from the perspective of faculty who served as debate coaches over a four-year period. It shares lessons learned and best practices for recruiting and preparing undergraduate students for a co-curricular debate competition, a subject that is missing in the literature.
ISSN:2504-284X