Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review

<h4>Objectives</h4> In those undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), sarcopenia is a strong prognostic factor for outcomes and mortality. This review identified working definitions and methods used to objectively assess sarcopenia in HNC. <h4>Method</h4> The scop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nedeljko Jovanovic, Tricia Chinnery, Sarah A. Mattonen, David A. Palma, Philip C. Doyle, Julie A. Theurer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704631/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1797987642564935680
author Nedeljko Jovanovic
Tricia Chinnery
Sarah A. Mattonen
David A. Palma
Philip C. Doyle
Julie A. Theurer
author_facet Nedeljko Jovanovic
Tricia Chinnery
Sarah A. Mattonen
David A. Palma
Philip C. Doyle
Julie A. Theurer
author_sort Nedeljko Jovanovic
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objectives</h4> In those undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), sarcopenia is a strong prognostic factor for outcomes and mortality. This review identified working definitions and methods used to objectively assess sarcopenia in HNC. <h4>Method</h4> The scoping review was performed in accordance with Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage methodology and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. <h4>Information sources</h4> Eligible studies were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. <h4>Study selection</h4> Inclusion criteria represented studies of adult HNC patients in which sarcopenia was listed as an outcome, full-text articles written in English, and empirical research studies with a quantitative design. <h4>Data extraction</h4> Eligible studies were assessed using a proprietary data extraction form. General information, article details and characteristics, and details related to the concept of the scoping review were extracted in an iterative process. <h4>Results</h4> Seventy-six studies published internationally from 2016 to 2021 on sarcopenia in HNC were included. The majority were retrospective (n = 56; 74%) and the prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 3.8% to 78.7%. Approximately two-thirds of studies used computed tomography (CT) to assess sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) (n = 53; 70%) was the most prevalent metric used to identify sarcopenia, followed by SMI at the third cervical vertebra (C3) (n = 4; 5%). <h4>Conclusions</h4> Currently, the most effective strategy to assess sarcopenia in HNC depends on several factors, including access to resources, patient and treatment characteristics, and the prognostic significance of outcomes used to represent sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measured at C3 may represent a practical, precise, and cost-effective biomarker for the detection of sarcopenia. However, combining SMM measurements at C3 with other sarcopenic parameters—including muscle strength and physical performance–may provide a more accurate risk profile for sarcopenia assessment and allow for a greater understanding of this condition in HNC.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:51:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f18c5b08be940f692a275155857de3b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:51:21Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-3f18c5b08be940f692a275155857de3b2022-12-22T04:36:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011711Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping reviewNedeljko JovanovicTricia ChinnerySarah A. MattonenDavid A. PalmaPhilip C. DoyleJulie A. Theurer<h4>Objectives</h4> In those undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), sarcopenia is a strong prognostic factor for outcomes and mortality. This review identified working definitions and methods used to objectively assess sarcopenia in HNC. <h4>Method</h4> The scoping review was performed in accordance with Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage methodology and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. <h4>Information sources</h4> Eligible studies were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. <h4>Study selection</h4> Inclusion criteria represented studies of adult HNC patients in which sarcopenia was listed as an outcome, full-text articles written in English, and empirical research studies with a quantitative design. <h4>Data extraction</h4> Eligible studies were assessed using a proprietary data extraction form. General information, article details and characteristics, and details related to the concept of the scoping review were extracted in an iterative process. <h4>Results</h4> Seventy-six studies published internationally from 2016 to 2021 on sarcopenia in HNC were included. The majority were retrospective (n = 56; 74%) and the prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 3.8% to 78.7%. Approximately two-thirds of studies used computed tomography (CT) to assess sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) (n = 53; 70%) was the most prevalent metric used to identify sarcopenia, followed by SMI at the third cervical vertebra (C3) (n = 4; 5%). <h4>Conclusions</h4> Currently, the most effective strategy to assess sarcopenia in HNC depends on several factors, including access to resources, patient and treatment characteristics, and the prognostic significance of outcomes used to represent sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measured at C3 may represent a practical, precise, and cost-effective biomarker for the detection of sarcopenia. However, combining SMM measurements at C3 with other sarcopenic parameters—including muscle strength and physical performance–may provide a more accurate risk profile for sarcopenia assessment and allow for a greater understanding of this condition in HNC.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704631/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Nedeljko Jovanovic
Tricia Chinnery
Sarah A. Mattonen
David A. Palma
Philip C. Doyle
Julie A. Theurer
Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review
PLoS ONE
title Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review
title_full Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review
title_fullStr Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review
title_short Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review
title_sort sarcopenia in head and neck cancer a scoping review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9704631/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT nedeljkojovanovic sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview
AT triciachinnery sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview
AT sarahamattonen sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview
AT davidapalma sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview
AT philipcdoyle sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview
AT julieatheurer sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview