The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids
BackgroundOpioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an important pillar in the treatment of individuals using opioids and its continuation during imprisonment is recommended. Despite this knowledge access to and continuation of OAT is still limited in many countries. The forced discontinuation during pre-tr...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00395/full |
_version_ | 1818027932714532864 |
---|---|
author | Anna Buadze Stephanie Baggio Stephanie Baggio Stephanie Baggio Roman Schleifer Eveline Aeberhard Hans Wolff Andres Schneeberger Andres Schneeberger Michael Liebrenz |
author_facet | Anna Buadze Stephanie Baggio Stephanie Baggio Stephanie Baggio Roman Schleifer Eveline Aeberhard Hans Wolff Andres Schneeberger Andres Schneeberger Michael Liebrenz |
author_sort | Anna Buadze |
collection | DOAJ |
description | BackgroundOpioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an important pillar in the treatment of individuals using opioids and its continuation during imprisonment is recommended. Despite this knowledge access to and continuation of OAT is still limited in many countries. The forced discontinuation during pre-trial detention can cause severe withdrawal symptoms, which in turn may significantly impair the defendant's ability to exercise granted procedural participation rights. Furthermore, it can be argued that forced discontinuation of a desired treatment represents a form of a compulsory intervention.AimsThe present study was developed against the backdrop of a recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (Wenner vs. Germany). It intended to examine how defense lawyers dealing with detained persons using opioids view and assess the accessibility of OAT in pre-trial detention as well as during imprisonment in different parts of Switzerland.MethodsUsing a qualitative approach, we interviewed 11 defense lawyers from three different cantons of Switzerland with multiple years of experience in providing legal representation to more than 220 defendants using heroin. The interviews were analyzed with QSR NVIVO 11 for Windows. A qualitative content analysis approach was used to evaluate findings.ResultsDefenders who had been exposed to the opioid crisis during the course of their legal career had adopted a positive attitude towards OAT and associated it with a stabilizing influence on their clients, an improvement in criminal prognosis, and a reduction in recidivism. They were generally of the opinion that access to OAT had improved, however identified a considerable variance in different penitentiaries, which were mediated by attitudes of staff and authorities. Based on the assessments of the defense lawyers, it can be estimated that the initiation of OAT especially during pre-trial detention is challenging. The predominant aim of OAT in a variety of Swiss prisons still seems to focus on a discontinuation, mediated by a forced reduction of medication. Some of the interventions reported are not in line with the principle of equivalence and strongly contrast the recommendations of the Council of Europe. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T04:55:45Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3f1efafee8d24e1b8e74d1438b4911b0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-0640 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T04:55:45Z |
publishDate | 2020-05-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
spelling | doaj.art-3f1efafee8d24e1b8e74d1438b4911b02022-12-22T02:01:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402020-05-011110.3389/fpsyt.2020.00395485815The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using OpioidsAnna Buadze0Stephanie Baggio1Stephanie Baggio2Stephanie Baggio3Roman Schleifer4Eveline Aeberhard5Hans Wolff6Andres Schneeberger7Andres Schneeberger8Michael Liebrenz9Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDivision of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandOffice of Corrections, Canton of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDivision of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandPsychiatrische Dienste Graubuenden, Chur, SwitzerlandDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandBackgroundOpioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an important pillar in the treatment of individuals using opioids and its continuation during imprisonment is recommended. Despite this knowledge access to and continuation of OAT is still limited in many countries. The forced discontinuation during pre-trial detention can cause severe withdrawal symptoms, which in turn may significantly impair the defendant's ability to exercise granted procedural participation rights. Furthermore, it can be argued that forced discontinuation of a desired treatment represents a form of a compulsory intervention.AimsThe present study was developed against the backdrop of a recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (Wenner vs. Germany). It intended to examine how defense lawyers dealing with detained persons using opioids view and assess the accessibility of OAT in pre-trial detention as well as during imprisonment in different parts of Switzerland.MethodsUsing a qualitative approach, we interviewed 11 defense lawyers from three different cantons of Switzerland with multiple years of experience in providing legal representation to more than 220 defendants using heroin. The interviews were analyzed with QSR NVIVO 11 for Windows. A qualitative content analysis approach was used to evaluate findings.ResultsDefenders who had been exposed to the opioid crisis during the course of their legal career had adopted a positive attitude towards OAT and associated it with a stabilizing influence on their clients, an improvement in criminal prognosis, and a reduction in recidivism. They were generally of the opinion that access to OAT had improved, however identified a considerable variance in different penitentiaries, which were mediated by attitudes of staff and authorities. Based on the assessments of the defense lawyers, it can be estimated that the initiation of OAT especially during pre-trial detention is challenging. The predominant aim of OAT in a variety of Swiss prisons still seems to focus on a discontinuation, mediated by a forced reduction of medication. Some of the interventions reported are not in line with the principle of equivalence and strongly contrast the recommendations of the Council of Europe.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00395/fullopioid agonist maintenance treatmentprisonqualitative researchdefense attorneysforced withdrawal |
spellingShingle | Anna Buadze Stephanie Baggio Stephanie Baggio Stephanie Baggio Roman Schleifer Eveline Aeberhard Hans Wolff Andres Schneeberger Andres Schneeberger Michael Liebrenz The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids Frontiers in Psychiatry opioid agonist maintenance treatment prison qualitative research defense attorneys forced withdrawal |
title | The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids |
title_full | The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids |
title_fullStr | The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids |
title_full_unstemmed | The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids |
title_short | The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids |
title_sort | accessibility of opioid agonist treatment and its forced discontinuation in swiss prisons attitudes perceptions and experiences of defense lawyers in dealing with detained persons using opioids |
topic | opioid agonist maintenance treatment prison qualitative research defense attorneys forced withdrawal |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00395/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT annabuadze theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT stephaniebaggio theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT stephaniebaggio theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT stephaniebaggio theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT romanschleifer theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT evelineaeberhard theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT hanswolff theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT andresschneeberger theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT andresschneeberger theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT michaelliebrenz theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT annabuadze accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT stephaniebaggio accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT stephaniebaggio accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT stephaniebaggio accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT romanschleifer accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT evelineaeberhard accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT hanswolff accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT andresschneeberger accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT andresschneeberger accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids AT michaelliebrenz accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids |