The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids

BackgroundOpioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an important pillar in the treatment of individuals using opioids and its continuation during imprisonment is recommended. Despite this knowledge access to and continuation of OAT is still limited in many countries. The forced discontinuation during pre-tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Buadze, Stephanie Baggio, Roman Schleifer, Eveline Aeberhard, Hans Wolff, Andres Schneeberger, Michael Liebrenz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00395/full
_version_ 1818027932714532864
author Anna Buadze
Stephanie Baggio
Stephanie Baggio
Stephanie Baggio
Roman Schleifer
Eveline Aeberhard
Hans Wolff
Andres Schneeberger
Andres Schneeberger
Michael Liebrenz
author_facet Anna Buadze
Stephanie Baggio
Stephanie Baggio
Stephanie Baggio
Roman Schleifer
Eveline Aeberhard
Hans Wolff
Andres Schneeberger
Andres Schneeberger
Michael Liebrenz
author_sort Anna Buadze
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundOpioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an important pillar in the treatment of individuals using opioids and its continuation during imprisonment is recommended. Despite this knowledge access to and continuation of OAT is still limited in many countries. The forced discontinuation during pre-trial detention can cause severe withdrawal symptoms, which in turn may significantly impair the defendant's ability to exercise granted procedural participation rights. Furthermore, it can be argued that forced discontinuation of a desired treatment represents a form of a compulsory intervention.AimsThe present study was developed against the backdrop of a recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (Wenner vs. Germany). It intended to examine how defense lawyers dealing with detained persons using opioids view and assess the accessibility of OAT in pre-trial detention as well as during imprisonment in different parts of Switzerland.MethodsUsing a qualitative approach, we interviewed 11 defense lawyers from three different cantons of Switzerland with multiple years of experience in providing legal representation to more than 220 defendants using heroin. The interviews were analyzed with QSR NVIVO 11 for Windows. A qualitative content analysis approach was used to evaluate findings.ResultsDefenders who had been exposed to the opioid crisis during the course of their legal career had adopted a positive attitude towards OAT and associated it with a stabilizing influence on their clients, an improvement in criminal prognosis, and a reduction in recidivism. They were generally of the opinion that access to OAT had improved, however identified a considerable variance in different penitentiaries, which were mediated by attitudes of staff and authorities. Based on the assessments of the defense lawyers, it can be estimated that the initiation of OAT especially during pre-trial detention is challenging. The predominant aim of OAT in a variety of Swiss prisons still seems to focus on a discontinuation, mediated by a forced reduction of medication. Some of the interventions reported are not in line with the principle of equivalence and strongly contrast the recommendations of the Council of Europe.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T04:55:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f1efafee8d24e1b8e74d1438b4911b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T04:55:45Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-3f1efafee8d24e1b8e74d1438b4911b02022-12-22T02:01:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402020-05-011110.3389/fpsyt.2020.00395485815The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using OpioidsAnna Buadze0Stephanie Baggio1Stephanie Baggio2Stephanie Baggio3Roman Schleifer4Eveline Aeberhard5Hans Wolff6Andres Schneeberger7Andres Schneeberger8Michael Liebrenz9Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDivision of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandOffice of Corrections, Canton of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDivision of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandPsychiatrische Dienste Graubuenden, Chur, SwitzerlandDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandBackgroundOpioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an important pillar in the treatment of individuals using opioids and its continuation during imprisonment is recommended. Despite this knowledge access to and continuation of OAT is still limited in many countries. The forced discontinuation during pre-trial detention can cause severe withdrawal symptoms, which in turn may significantly impair the defendant's ability to exercise granted procedural participation rights. Furthermore, it can be argued that forced discontinuation of a desired treatment represents a form of a compulsory intervention.AimsThe present study was developed against the backdrop of a recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (Wenner vs. Germany). It intended to examine how defense lawyers dealing with detained persons using opioids view and assess the accessibility of OAT in pre-trial detention as well as during imprisonment in different parts of Switzerland.MethodsUsing a qualitative approach, we interviewed 11 defense lawyers from three different cantons of Switzerland with multiple years of experience in providing legal representation to more than 220 defendants using heroin. The interviews were analyzed with QSR NVIVO 11 for Windows. A qualitative content analysis approach was used to evaluate findings.ResultsDefenders who had been exposed to the opioid crisis during the course of their legal career had adopted a positive attitude towards OAT and associated it with a stabilizing influence on their clients, an improvement in criminal prognosis, and a reduction in recidivism. They were generally of the opinion that access to OAT had improved, however identified a considerable variance in different penitentiaries, which were mediated by attitudes of staff and authorities. Based on the assessments of the defense lawyers, it can be estimated that the initiation of OAT especially during pre-trial detention is challenging. The predominant aim of OAT in a variety of Swiss prisons still seems to focus on a discontinuation, mediated by a forced reduction of medication. Some of the interventions reported are not in line with the principle of equivalence and strongly contrast the recommendations of the Council of Europe.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00395/fullopioid agonist maintenance treatmentprisonqualitative researchdefense attorneysforced withdrawal
spellingShingle Anna Buadze
Stephanie Baggio
Stephanie Baggio
Stephanie Baggio
Roman Schleifer
Eveline Aeberhard
Hans Wolff
Andres Schneeberger
Andres Schneeberger
Michael Liebrenz
The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids
Frontiers in Psychiatry
opioid agonist maintenance treatment
prison
qualitative research
defense attorneys
forced withdrawal
title The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids
title_full The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids
title_fullStr The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids
title_full_unstemmed The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids
title_short The Accessibility of Opioid Agonist Treatment and Its Forced Discontinuation in Swiss Prisons—Attitudes, Perceptions and Experiences of Defense Lawyers in Dealing With Detained Persons Using Opioids
title_sort accessibility of opioid agonist treatment and its forced discontinuation in swiss prisons attitudes perceptions and experiences of defense lawyers in dealing with detained persons using opioids
topic opioid agonist maintenance treatment
prison
qualitative research
defense attorneys
forced withdrawal
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00395/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annabuadze theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT stephaniebaggio theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT stephaniebaggio theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT stephaniebaggio theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT romanschleifer theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT evelineaeberhard theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT hanswolff theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT andresschneeberger theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT andresschneeberger theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT michaelliebrenz theaccessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT annabuadze accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT stephaniebaggio accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT stephaniebaggio accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT stephaniebaggio accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT romanschleifer accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT evelineaeberhard accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT hanswolff accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT andresschneeberger accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT andresschneeberger accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids
AT michaelliebrenz accessibilityofopioidagonisttreatmentanditsforceddiscontinuationinswissprisonsattitudesperceptionsandexperiencesofdefenselawyersindealingwithdetainedpersonsusingopioids