Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation

ABSTRACT The mechanical resistance to penetration when related to the water content is an indicator often used of soil compaction, the use of positioning methods for greater accuracy of this review is important. In this context, this study aimed to determine the variability of positioning methods pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZERBATO CRISTIANO, ARIEL M. COMPAGNON, MURILO A. VOLTARELLI, DAVID L. ROSALEN, CARLOS E. A. FURLANI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola 2016-08-01
Series:Engenharia Agrícola
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400696&tlng=en
_version_ 1831702799438577664
author ZERBATO CRISTIANO
ARIEL M. COMPAGNON
MURILO A. VOLTARELLI
DAVID L. ROSALEN
CARLOS E. A. FURLANI
author_facet ZERBATO CRISTIANO
ARIEL M. COMPAGNON
MURILO A. VOLTARELLI
DAVID L. ROSALEN
CARLOS E. A. FURLANI
author_sort ZERBATO CRISTIANO
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT The mechanical resistance to penetration when related to the water content is an indicator often used of soil compaction, the use of positioning methods for greater accuracy of this review is important. In this context, this study aimed to determine the variability of positioning methods provided by GPS receivers to determine the spatial behavior of physical attributes related to soil compaction. The study area is located in the municipality of Jaboticabal, around the latitude 21º15’22”S and longitude 48º18’58”W, being characterized with a clayey Oxisol. The variables used as parameters of soil physical properties were the mechanical resistance to penetration and water content, using a sampling grid of 20 x 20 m, totaling 60 points. We used six models of GPS receivers: Garmin Etrex Vista, Garmin Etrex 30, Ashtech MM6, Trimble Nomad, Garmin Map 62 and Trimble R6, with all georeferenced points in the regular grid intersections. The georeferencing using GPS receivers (single point positioning and post-processed differential correction) interfered in characterizing the spatial variability of soil resistance to penetration, differently for some receivers to the water content attribute. Positioning methods with post-processed differential correction, using R6 and MM6 models, better define the management zones of soil resistance to penetration.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T15:28:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f1f921840d34b31b91071147c930b0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0100-6916
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T15:28:06Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
record_format Article
series Engenharia Agrícola
spelling doaj.art-3f1f921840d34b31b91071147c930b0a2022-12-21T19:35:44ZengSociedade Brasileira de Engenharia AgrícolaEngenharia Agrícola0100-69162016-08-0136469670510.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n4p696-705/2016Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigationZERBATO CRISTIANOARIEL M. COMPAGNONMURILO A. VOLTARELLIDAVID L. ROSALENCARLOS E. A. FURLANIABSTRACT The mechanical resistance to penetration when related to the water content is an indicator often used of soil compaction, the use of positioning methods for greater accuracy of this review is important. In this context, this study aimed to determine the variability of positioning methods provided by GPS receivers to determine the spatial behavior of physical attributes related to soil compaction. The study area is located in the municipality of Jaboticabal, around the latitude 21º15’22”S and longitude 48º18’58”W, being characterized with a clayey Oxisol. The variables used as parameters of soil physical properties were the mechanical resistance to penetration and water content, using a sampling grid of 20 x 20 m, totaling 60 points. We used six models of GPS receivers: Garmin Etrex Vista, Garmin Etrex 30, Ashtech MM6, Trimble Nomad, Garmin Map 62 and Trimble R6, with all georeferenced points in the regular grid intersections. The georeferencing using GPS receivers (single point positioning and post-processed differential correction) interfered in characterizing the spatial variability of soil resistance to penetration, differently for some receivers to the water content attribute. Positioning methods with post-processed differential correction, using R6 and MM6 models, better define the management zones of soil resistance to penetration.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400696&tlng=enGPSpenetrometersoil compactionsoil water content
spellingShingle ZERBATO CRISTIANO
ARIEL M. COMPAGNON
MURILO A. VOLTARELLI
DAVID L. ROSALEN
CARLOS E. A. FURLANI
Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
Engenharia Agrícola
GPS
penetrometer
soil compaction
soil water content
title Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
title_full Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
title_fullStr Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
title_full_unstemmed Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
title_short Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
title_sort variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
topic GPS
penetrometer
soil compaction
soil water content
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400696&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT zerbatocristiano variationsontheexpertiseoftwoattributesofphysicalsoilduetodifferencesinthemethodofglobalsatellitenavigation
AT arielmcompagnon variationsontheexpertiseoftwoattributesofphysicalsoilduetodifferencesinthemethodofglobalsatellitenavigation
AT muriloavoltarelli variationsontheexpertiseoftwoattributesofphysicalsoilduetodifferencesinthemethodofglobalsatellitenavigation
AT davidlrosalen variationsontheexpertiseoftwoattributesofphysicalsoilduetodifferencesinthemethodofglobalsatellitenavigation
AT carloseafurlani variationsontheexpertiseoftwoattributesofphysicalsoilduetodifferencesinthemethodofglobalsatellitenavigation