Opinions, practice patterns, and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physicians

Louise M Henderson,1 Laura M Jones,1 Mary W Marsh,1 Alison T Brenner,2,3 Adam O Goldstein,4 Thad S Benefield,1 Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman,5 Paul L Molina,1 M Patricia Rivera,2 Daniel S Reuland2,3 1Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Department of Medicine,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henderson LM, Jones LM, Marsh MW, Brenner AT, Goldstein AO, Benefield TS, Greenwood-Hickman MA, Molina PL, Rivera MP, Reuland DS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2018-01-01
Series:Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/opinions-practice-patterns-and-perceived-barriers-to-lung-cancer-scree-peer-reviewed-article-RMHP
_version_ 1818855698126077952
author Henderson LM
Jones LM
Marsh MW
Brenner AT
Goldstein AO
Benefield TS
Greenwood-Hickman MA
Molina PL
Rivera MP
Reuland DS
author_facet Henderson LM
Jones LM
Marsh MW
Brenner AT
Goldstein AO
Benefield TS
Greenwood-Hickman MA
Molina PL
Rivera MP
Reuland DS
author_sort Henderson LM
collection DOAJ
description Louise M Henderson,1 Laura M Jones,1 Mary W Marsh,1 Alison T Brenner,2,3 Adam O Goldstein,4 Thad S Benefield,1 Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman,5 Paul L Molina,1 M Patricia Rivera,2 Daniel S Reuland2,3 1Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Department of Medicine, 3The University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4Department of Family Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 5Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA Introduction: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommended annual lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for high-risk patients in December 2013. We compared lung cancer screening-related opinions and practices among attending and resident primary care physicians (PCPs). Methods: In 2015, we conducted a 23-item survey among physicians at a large academic medical center. We surveyed 100 resident PCPs (30% response rate) and 86 attending PCPs (49% response rate) in Family Medicine and Internal Medicine. The questions focused on physicians’ opinions, knowledge of recommendations, self-reported practice patterns, and barriers to lung cancer screening. In 2015 and 2016, we compared responses among attending versus resident PCPs using chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests and 2-samples t-tests. Results: Compared with resident PCPs, attending PCPs were older (mean age =47 vs 30 years) and more likely to be male (54% vs 37%). Over half of both groups concurred that inconsistent recommendations make deciding whether or not to screen difficult. A substantial proportion in both groups indicated that they were undecided about the benefit of lung cancer screening for patients (43% attending PCPs and 55% resident PCPs). The majority of attending and resident PCPs agreed that barriers to screening included limited time during patient visits (62% and 78%, respectively), cost to patients (74% and 83%, respectively), potential for complications (53% and 70%, respectively), and a high false-positive rate (67% and 73%, respectively). Conclusion: There was no evidence to suggest that attending and resident PCPs had differing opinions about lung cancer screening. For population-based implementation of lung cancer screening, physicians and trainees will need resources and time to address the benefits and harms with their patients. Keywords: lung neoplasms, mass screening, physician behavior, surveys, questionnaires, low dose computed tomography, benefits, harms
first_indexed 2024-12-19T08:12:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f22aa00d31147a18295bbf559e18b86
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1179-1594
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T08:12:44Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
spelling doaj.art-3f22aa00d31147a18295bbf559e18b862022-12-21T20:29:35ZengDove Medical PressRisk Management and Healthcare Policy1179-15942018-01-01Volume 1018919536488Opinions, practice patterns, and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physiciansHenderson LMJones LMMarsh MWBrenner ATGoldstein AOBenefield TSGreenwood-Hickman MAMolina PLRivera MPReuland DSLouise M Henderson,1 Laura M Jones,1 Mary W Marsh,1 Alison T Brenner,2,3 Adam O Goldstein,4 Thad S Benefield,1 Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman,5 Paul L Molina,1 M Patricia Rivera,2 Daniel S Reuland2,3 1Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Department of Medicine, 3The University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4Department of Family Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 5Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA Introduction: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommended annual lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for high-risk patients in December 2013. We compared lung cancer screening-related opinions and practices among attending and resident primary care physicians (PCPs). Methods: In 2015, we conducted a 23-item survey among physicians at a large academic medical center. We surveyed 100 resident PCPs (30% response rate) and 86 attending PCPs (49% response rate) in Family Medicine and Internal Medicine. The questions focused on physicians’ opinions, knowledge of recommendations, self-reported practice patterns, and barriers to lung cancer screening. In 2015 and 2016, we compared responses among attending versus resident PCPs using chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests and 2-samples t-tests. Results: Compared with resident PCPs, attending PCPs were older (mean age =47 vs 30 years) and more likely to be male (54% vs 37%). Over half of both groups concurred that inconsistent recommendations make deciding whether or not to screen difficult. A substantial proportion in both groups indicated that they were undecided about the benefit of lung cancer screening for patients (43% attending PCPs and 55% resident PCPs). The majority of attending and resident PCPs agreed that barriers to screening included limited time during patient visits (62% and 78%, respectively), cost to patients (74% and 83%, respectively), potential for complications (53% and 70%, respectively), and a high false-positive rate (67% and 73%, respectively). Conclusion: There was no evidence to suggest that attending and resident PCPs had differing opinions about lung cancer screening. For population-based implementation of lung cancer screening, physicians and trainees will need resources and time to address the benefits and harms with their patients. Keywords: lung neoplasms, mass screening, physician behavior, surveys, questionnaires, low dose computed tomography, benefits, harmshttps://www.dovepress.com/opinions-practice-patterns-and-perceived-barriers-to-lung-cancer-scree-peer-reviewed-article-RMHPlung neoplasmsmass screeningphysician behaviorsurveys and questionnaires
spellingShingle Henderson LM
Jones LM
Marsh MW
Brenner AT
Goldstein AO
Benefield TS
Greenwood-Hickman MA
Molina PL
Rivera MP
Reuland DS
Opinions, practice patterns, and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physicians
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
lung neoplasms
mass screening
physician behavior
surveys and questionnaires
title Opinions, practice patterns, and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physicians
title_full Opinions, practice patterns, and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physicians
title_fullStr Opinions, practice patterns, and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physicians
title_full_unstemmed Opinions, practice patterns, and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physicians
title_short Opinions, practice patterns, and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physicians
title_sort opinions practice patterns and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physicians
topic lung neoplasms
mass screening
physician behavior
surveys and questionnaires
url https://www.dovepress.com/opinions-practice-patterns-and-perceived-barriers-to-lung-cancer-scree-peer-reviewed-article-RMHP
work_keys_str_mv AT hendersonlm opinionspracticepatternsandperceivedbarrierstolungcancerscreeningamongattendingandresidentprimarycarephysicians
AT joneslm opinionspracticepatternsandperceivedbarrierstolungcancerscreeningamongattendingandresidentprimarycarephysicians
AT marshmw opinionspracticepatternsandperceivedbarrierstolungcancerscreeningamongattendingandresidentprimarycarephysicians
AT brennerat opinionspracticepatternsandperceivedbarrierstolungcancerscreeningamongattendingandresidentprimarycarephysicians
AT goldsteinao opinionspracticepatternsandperceivedbarrierstolungcancerscreeningamongattendingandresidentprimarycarephysicians
AT benefieldts opinionspracticepatternsandperceivedbarrierstolungcancerscreeningamongattendingandresidentprimarycarephysicians
AT greenwoodhickmanma opinionspracticepatternsandperceivedbarrierstolungcancerscreeningamongattendingandresidentprimarycarephysicians
AT molinapl opinionspracticepatternsandperceivedbarrierstolungcancerscreeningamongattendingandresidentprimarycarephysicians
AT riveramp opinionspracticepatternsandperceivedbarrierstolungcancerscreeningamongattendingandresidentprimarycarephysicians
AT reulandds opinionspracticepatternsandperceivedbarrierstolungcancerscreeningamongattendingandresidentprimarycarephysicians