Thematic analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated for kidney transplant who did not receive a kidney

Abstract Background A potential pitfall of policies intended to promote referral for kidney transplant is that greater numbers of patients may be evaluated for transplant without experiencing the intended benefit of receiving a kidney. Little is known about the potential implications of this experie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catherine R. Butler, Janelle S. Taylor, Peter P. Reese, Ann M. O’Hare
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-020-01951-1
_version_ 1818972523502501888
author Catherine R. Butler
Janelle S. Taylor
Peter P. Reese
Ann M. O’Hare
author_facet Catherine R. Butler
Janelle S. Taylor
Peter P. Reese
Ann M. O’Hare
author_sort Catherine R. Butler
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background A potential pitfall of policies intended to promote referral for kidney transplant is that greater numbers of patients may be evaluated for transplant without experiencing the intended benefit of receiving a kidney. Little is known about the potential implications of this experience for patients. Methods We performed a thematic analysis of clinician documentation in the electronic medical records of all adults at a single medical center with advanced kidney disease who were referred to the local transplant coordinator for evaluation between 2008 and 2018 but did not receive a kidney. Results 148 of 209 patients referred to the local kidney transplant coordinator at our center (71%) had not received a kidney by the end of follow-up. Three dominant themes emerged from qualitative analysis of documentation in the medical records of these patients: 1) Forward momentum: patients found themselves engaged in an iterative process of testing and treatment that tended to move forward unless an absolute contraindication to transplant was identified or patients disengaged; 2) Potential for transplant shapes other medical decisions: engagement in the transplant evaluation process could impact many other aspects of patients’ care; and 3) Personal responsibility and psychological burden for patients and families: clinician documentation suggested that patients felt personally responsible for the course of their evaluation and that the process could take an emotional toll on them and their family members. Conclusions Engagement in the kidney transplant evaluation process can be a significant undertaking for patients and families and may impact many other aspects of their care. Policies to promote referral for kidney transplant should be coupled with efforts to strengthen shared decision-making to ensure that the decision to undergo transplant evaluation is framed as an explicit choice with benefits, risks, and alternatives and patients have an opportunity to shape their involvement in this process.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T15:09:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f27108af5734b18973edd8dd5cf287a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2369
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T15:09:37Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Nephrology
spelling doaj.art-3f27108af5734b18973edd8dd5cf287a2022-12-21T19:36:21ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692020-07-0121111010.1186/s12882-020-01951-1Thematic analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated for kidney transplant who did not receive a kidneyCatherine R. Butler0Janelle S. Taylor1Peter P. Reese2Ann M. O’Hare3Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and the Kidney Research Institute, University of WashingtonDepartment of Anthropology, University of TorontoRenal-Electrolyte & Hypertension Division and Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and the Kidney Research Institute, University of WashingtonAbstract Background A potential pitfall of policies intended to promote referral for kidney transplant is that greater numbers of patients may be evaluated for transplant without experiencing the intended benefit of receiving a kidney. Little is known about the potential implications of this experience for patients. Methods We performed a thematic analysis of clinician documentation in the electronic medical records of all adults at a single medical center with advanced kidney disease who were referred to the local transplant coordinator for evaluation between 2008 and 2018 but did not receive a kidney. Results 148 of 209 patients referred to the local kidney transplant coordinator at our center (71%) had not received a kidney by the end of follow-up. Three dominant themes emerged from qualitative analysis of documentation in the medical records of these patients: 1) Forward momentum: patients found themselves engaged in an iterative process of testing and treatment that tended to move forward unless an absolute contraindication to transplant was identified or patients disengaged; 2) Potential for transplant shapes other medical decisions: engagement in the transplant evaluation process could impact many other aspects of patients’ care; and 3) Personal responsibility and psychological burden for patients and families: clinician documentation suggested that patients felt personally responsible for the course of their evaluation and that the process could take an emotional toll on them and their family members. Conclusions Engagement in the kidney transplant evaluation process can be a significant undertaking for patients and families and may impact many other aspects of their care. Policies to promote referral for kidney transplant should be coupled with efforts to strengthen shared decision-making to ensure that the decision to undergo transplant evaluation is framed as an explicit choice with benefits, risks, and alternatives and patients have an opportunity to shape their involvement in this process.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-020-01951-1Kidney transplant evaluationPerson-centered medicineShared decision-makingEnd-stage kidney diseaseTransplantQualitative analysis
spellingShingle Catherine R. Butler
Janelle S. Taylor
Peter P. Reese
Ann M. O’Hare
Thematic analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated for kidney transplant who did not receive a kidney
BMC Nephrology
Kidney transplant evaluation
Person-centered medicine
Shared decision-making
End-stage kidney disease
Transplant
Qualitative analysis
title Thematic analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated for kidney transplant who did not receive a kidney
title_full Thematic analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated for kidney transplant who did not receive a kidney
title_fullStr Thematic analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated for kidney transplant who did not receive a kidney
title_full_unstemmed Thematic analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated for kidney transplant who did not receive a kidney
title_short Thematic analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated for kidney transplant who did not receive a kidney
title_sort thematic analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated for kidney transplant who did not receive a kidney
topic Kidney transplant evaluation
Person-centered medicine
Shared decision-making
End-stage kidney disease
Transplant
Qualitative analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-020-01951-1
work_keys_str_mv AT catherinerbutler thematicanalysisofthemedicalrecordsofpatientsevaluatedforkidneytransplantwhodidnotreceiveakidney
AT janellestaylor thematicanalysisofthemedicalrecordsofpatientsevaluatedforkidneytransplantwhodidnotreceiveakidney
AT peterpreese thematicanalysisofthemedicalrecordsofpatientsevaluatedforkidneytransplantwhodidnotreceiveakidney
AT annmohare thematicanalysisofthemedicalrecordsofpatientsevaluatedforkidneytransplantwhodidnotreceiveakidney