FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing Us from Distinguishing True from False News

Misinformation posting and spreading in social media is ignited by personal decisions on the truthfulness of news that may cause wide and deep cascades at a large scale in a fraction of minutes. When individuals are exposed to information, they usually take a few seconds to decide if the content (or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giancarlo Ruffo, Alfonso Semeraro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Future Internet
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/10/283
_version_ 1797431545552699392
author Giancarlo Ruffo
Alfonso Semeraro
author_facet Giancarlo Ruffo
Alfonso Semeraro
author_sort Giancarlo Ruffo
collection DOAJ
description Misinformation posting and spreading in social media is ignited by personal decisions on the truthfulness of news that may cause wide and deep cascades at a large scale in a fraction of minutes. When individuals are exposed to information, they usually take a few seconds to decide if the content (or the source) is reliable and whether to share it. Although the opportunity to verify the rumour is often just one click away, many users fail to make a correct evaluation. We studied this phenomenon with a web-based questionnaire that was compiled by 7298 different volunteers, where the participants were asked to mark 20 news items as true or false. Interestingly, false news is correctly identified more frequently than true news, but showing the full article instead of just the title, surprisingly, does not increase general accuracy. Additionally, displaying the original source of the news may contribute to misleading the user in some cases, while the genuine wisdom of the crowd can positively assist individuals’ ability to classify news correctly. Finally, participants whose browsing activity suggests a parallel fact-checking activity show better performance and declare themselves as young adults. This work highlights a series of pitfalls that can influence human annotators when building false news datasets, which in turn can fuel the research on the automated fake news detection; furthermore, these findings challenge the common rationale of AI that suggest users read the full article before re-sharing.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:46:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f3733f82862496382f942ba0d30c00b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-5903
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:46:43Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Future Internet
spelling doaj.art-3f3733f82862496382f942ba0d30c00b2023-12-02T00:30:13ZengMDPI AGFuture Internet1999-59032022-09-01141028310.3390/fi14100283FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing Us from Distinguishing True from False NewsGiancarlo Ruffo0Alfonso Semeraro1Department of Computer Science, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10149 Torino, ItalyDepartment of Computer Science, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10149 Torino, ItalyMisinformation posting and spreading in social media is ignited by personal decisions on the truthfulness of news that may cause wide and deep cascades at a large scale in a fraction of minutes. When individuals are exposed to information, they usually take a few seconds to decide if the content (or the source) is reliable and whether to share it. Although the opportunity to verify the rumour is often just one click away, many users fail to make a correct evaluation. We studied this phenomenon with a web-based questionnaire that was compiled by 7298 different volunteers, where the participants were asked to mark 20 news items as true or false. Interestingly, false news is correctly identified more frequently than true news, but showing the full article instead of just the title, surprisingly, does not increase general accuracy. Additionally, displaying the original source of the news may contribute to misleading the user in some cases, while the genuine wisdom of the crowd can positively assist individuals’ ability to classify news correctly. Finally, participants whose browsing activity suggests a parallel fact-checking activity show better performance and declare themselves as young adults. This work highlights a series of pitfalls that can influence human annotators when building false news datasets, which in turn can fuel the research on the automated fake news detection; furthermore, these findings challenge the common rationale of AI that suggest users read the full article before re-sharing.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/10/283fake newsmisinformationdisinformationcognitive biasessocial mediasocial influence
spellingShingle Giancarlo Ruffo
Alfonso Semeraro
FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing Us from Distinguishing True from False News
Future Internet
fake news
misinformation
disinformation
cognitive biases
social media
social influence
title FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing Us from Distinguishing True from False News
title_full FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing Us from Distinguishing True from False News
title_fullStr FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing Us from Distinguishing True from False News
title_full_unstemmed FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing Us from Distinguishing True from False News
title_short FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing Us from Distinguishing True from False News
title_sort fakenewslab experimental study on biases and pitfalls preventing us from distinguishing true from false news
topic fake news
misinformation
disinformation
cognitive biases
social media
social influence
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/10/283
work_keys_str_mv AT giancarloruffo fakenewslabexperimentalstudyonbiasesandpitfallspreventingusfromdistinguishingtruefromfalsenews
AT alfonsosemeraro fakenewslabexperimentalstudyonbiasesandpitfallspreventingusfromdistinguishingtruefromfalsenews