Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods
Recommendations of sustainable design methods are usually based on theory, not empirical industry tests. Furthermore, since professionals often mix components of different design methods, recommending whole methods may not be relevant. It may be better to recommend component activities or mindsets....
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Design Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000177/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1811156423765131264 |
---|---|
author | Jeremy Faludi Felix Yiu Alice Agogino |
author_facet | Jeremy Faludi Felix Yiu Alice Agogino |
author_sort | Jeremy Faludi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Recommendations of sustainable design methods are usually based on theory, not empirical industry tests. Furthermore, since professionals often mix components of different design methods, recommending whole methods may not be relevant. It may be better to recommend component activities or mindsets. To provide empirical grounding for recommendations, this study performed 23 workshops on three sustainable design methods involving over 172 professionals from 27 companies, including consultancies and manufacturers in three industries (consumer electronics, furniture and clothing). The design methods tested were The Natural Step, Whole System Mapping and Biomimicry. Participants were surveyed about what components in each design method drove perceived innovation, sustainability or other value, and why. The most valued components only partially supported theoretical predictions. Thus, recommendations should be more empirically based. Results also found unique and complementary value in components of each method, which suggests recommending mixed methods for sustainable design. This may help design professionals find more value in green design practices, and thus integrate sustainability more into their practice. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:51:20Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3f3c2fba015e4defaccbc9fda0d0eb73 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2053-4701 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:51:20Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Design Science |
spelling | doaj.art-3f3c2fba015e4defaccbc9fda0d0eb732023-03-09T12:32:01ZengCambridge University PressDesign Science2053-47012020-01-01610.1017/dsj.2020.17Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methodsJeremy Faludi0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9673-5305Felix Yiu1Alice Agogino2Department of Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat, 15 2628CE Delft, The NetherlandsDepartment of Architecture, University of California Berkeley, 230 Wurster Hall #1820, Berkeley, CA94720, USADepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Blum Hall 200E, Berkeley, CA94720, USARecommendations of sustainable design methods are usually based on theory, not empirical industry tests. Furthermore, since professionals often mix components of different design methods, recommending whole methods may not be relevant. It may be better to recommend component activities or mindsets. To provide empirical grounding for recommendations, this study performed 23 workshops on three sustainable design methods involving over 172 professionals from 27 companies, including consultancies and manufacturers in three industries (consumer electronics, furniture and clothing). The design methods tested were The Natural Step, Whole System Mapping and Biomimicry. Participants were surveyed about what components in each design method drove perceived innovation, sustainability or other value, and why. The most valued components only partially supported theoretical predictions. Thus, recommendations should be more empirically based. Results also found unique and complementary value in components of each method, which suggests recommending mixed methods for sustainable design. This may help design professionals find more value in green design practices, and thus integrate sustainability more into their practice.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000177/type/journal_articlesustainable design methodsgreen design methodseco-designdesign methodologydesign activitiesdesign mindsets |
spellingShingle | Jeremy Faludi Felix Yiu Alice Agogino Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods Design Science sustainable design methods green design methods eco-design design methodology design activities design mindsets |
title | Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods |
title_full | Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods |
title_fullStr | Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods |
title_short | Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods |
title_sort | where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value empirical tests of three sustainable design methods |
topic | sustainable design methods green design methods eco-design design methodology design activities design mindsets |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000177/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeremyfaludi wheredoprofessionalsfindsustainabilityandinnovationvalueempiricaltestsofthreesustainabledesignmethods AT felixyiu wheredoprofessionalsfindsustainabilityandinnovationvalueempiricaltestsofthreesustainabledesignmethods AT aliceagogino wheredoprofessionalsfindsustainabilityandinnovationvalueempiricaltestsofthreesustainabledesignmethods |