Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods

Recommendations of sustainable design methods are usually based on theory, not empirical industry tests. Furthermore, since professionals often mix components of different design methods, recommending whole methods may not be relevant. It may be better to recommend component activities or mindsets....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeremy Faludi, Felix Yiu, Alice Agogino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020-01-01
Series:Design Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000177/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156423765131264
author Jeremy Faludi
Felix Yiu
Alice Agogino
author_facet Jeremy Faludi
Felix Yiu
Alice Agogino
author_sort Jeremy Faludi
collection DOAJ
description Recommendations of sustainable design methods are usually based on theory, not empirical industry tests. Furthermore, since professionals often mix components of different design methods, recommending whole methods may not be relevant. It may be better to recommend component activities or mindsets. To provide empirical grounding for recommendations, this study performed 23 workshops on three sustainable design methods involving over 172 professionals from 27 companies, including consultancies and manufacturers in three industries (consumer electronics, furniture and clothing). The design methods tested were The Natural Step, Whole System Mapping and Biomimicry. Participants were surveyed about what components in each design method drove perceived innovation, sustainability or other value, and why. The most valued components only partially supported theoretical predictions. Thus, recommendations should be more empirically based. Results also found unique and complementary value in components of each method, which suggests recommending mixed methods for sustainable design. This may help design professionals find more value in green design practices, and thus integrate sustainability more into their practice.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:51:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f3c2fba015e4defaccbc9fda0d0eb73
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2053-4701
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:51:20Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Design Science
spelling doaj.art-3f3c2fba015e4defaccbc9fda0d0eb732023-03-09T12:32:01ZengCambridge University PressDesign Science2053-47012020-01-01610.1017/dsj.2020.17Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methodsJeremy Faludi0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9673-5305Felix Yiu1Alice Agogino2Department of Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat, 15 2628CE Delft, The NetherlandsDepartment of Architecture, University of California Berkeley, 230 Wurster Hall #1820, Berkeley, CA94720, USADepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Blum Hall 200E, Berkeley, CA94720, USARecommendations of sustainable design methods are usually based on theory, not empirical industry tests. Furthermore, since professionals often mix components of different design methods, recommending whole methods may not be relevant. It may be better to recommend component activities or mindsets. To provide empirical grounding for recommendations, this study performed 23 workshops on three sustainable design methods involving over 172 professionals from 27 companies, including consultancies and manufacturers in three industries (consumer electronics, furniture and clothing). The design methods tested were The Natural Step, Whole System Mapping and Biomimicry. Participants were surveyed about what components in each design method drove perceived innovation, sustainability or other value, and why. The most valued components only partially supported theoretical predictions. Thus, recommendations should be more empirically based. Results also found unique and complementary value in components of each method, which suggests recommending mixed methods for sustainable design. This may help design professionals find more value in green design practices, and thus integrate sustainability more into their practice.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000177/type/journal_articlesustainable design methodsgreen design methodseco-designdesign methodologydesign activitiesdesign mindsets
spellingShingle Jeremy Faludi
Felix Yiu
Alice Agogino
Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods
Design Science
sustainable design methods
green design methods
eco-design
design methodology
design activities
design mindsets
title Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods
title_full Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods
title_fullStr Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods
title_full_unstemmed Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods
title_short Where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value? Empirical tests of three sustainable design methods
title_sort where do professionals find sustainability and innovation value empirical tests of three sustainable design methods
topic sustainable design methods
green design methods
eco-design
design methodology
design activities
design mindsets
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2053470120000177/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremyfaludi wheredoprofessionalsfindsustainabilityandinnovationvalueempiricaltestsofthreesustainabledesignmethods
AT felixyiu wheredoprofessionalsfindsustainabilityandinnovationvalueempiricaltestsofthreesustainabledesignmethods
AT aliceagogino wheredoprofessionalsfindsustainabilityandinnovationvalueempiricaltestsofthreesustainabledesignmethods