Evaluation of the clinical efficiency of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of sciatica

Objective: Evaluation of clinical efficiancy of fluoroscopy-accompanied transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with symptomatic lumbar foraminal intervertebral disc herniation and foraminal stenosis. Methods: Fifty patients, who underwent fluoroscopic-guided epidural steroid injection...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zafer Gündoğdu, İbrahim Burak Atcı, Serdal Albayrak, Hakan Yılmaz, Aykut Urfalıoğlu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: London Academic Publishing 2015-12-01
Series:Romanian Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/roneurosurgery/article/view/860
_version_ 1828780324854693888
author Zafer Gündoğdu
İbrahim Burak Atcı
Serdal Albayrak
Hakan Yılmaz
Aykut Urfalıoğlu
author_facet Zafer Gündoğdu
İbrahim Burak Atcı
Serdal Albayrak
Hakan Yılmaz
Aykut Urfalıoğlu
author_sort Zafer Gündoğdu
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Evaluation of clinical efficiancy of fluoroscopy-accompanied transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with symptomatic lumbar foraminal intervertebral disc herniation and foraminal stenosis. Methods: Fifty patients, who underwent fluoroscopic-guided epidural steroid injection between 19.12.2013 - 28.02.2014, were evaluated retrospectively. Pain levels of patients before the procedure, after 3 weeks and after 6 months were compared using visuel analog scale (VAS). Fifty percent or more decrease, less than 50% decrease and no change in VAS were evaluated as sufficient response, insufficient response and unresponsiveness, respectively. The patients were asked whether they would undergo this process again and “Yes”, “Maybe” and “No” answers were evaluated for patient satisfaction score. Results: In 50 patients (32 female, 18 male), average pain levels were found to be 8.4 (VAS 7-9), 4.3 (VAS 1-9) and 4.4 (VAS 0-9) before the procedure, 3 weeks after the procedure and 6 months after the procedure, respectively. While thirty-seven (74%) of the patients were found to have sufficient response to treatment 3 weeks after the procedure, 10 (20%) patients were found to have insufficient response. There was no response to treatment in 3 (6%) patients. While thirty-five (70%) of the patients were found to have sufficient response to treatment 6 months after the procedure, 10 (20%) patients were found to have insufficient response. Six months after the procedure, there was no response to treatment in 5 patients (%10). Statistically significant improvement was observed when the pre and post-procedure VAS scores were compared. Forty (80%) patients gave the answer “Yes” to the question whether they would undergo this procedure again. Conclusion: We found that fluoroscopic guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection is effective in pain relief in patients with lumbar foraminal intervertebral disc herniation and foraminal stenosis that are resistant to pharmacological and physical therapy and have no absolute indication for surgery.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T17:15:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f422115187b418c965e1b9f603ef723
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1220-8841
2344-4959
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T17:15:13Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher London Academic Publishing
record_format Article
series Romanian Neurosurgery
spelling doaj.art-3f422115187b418c965e1b9f603ef7232022-12-22T00:57:21ZengLondon Academic PublishingRomanian Neurosurgery1220-88412344-49592015-12-01294Evaluation of the clinical efficiency of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of sciaticaZafer Gündoğduİbrahim Burak AtcıSerdal AlbayrakHakan YılmazAykut UrfalıoğluObjective: Evaluation of clinical efficiancy of fluoroscopy-accompanied transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with symptomatic lumbar foraminal intervertebral disc herniation and foraminal stenosis. Methods: Fifty patients, who underwent fluoroscopic-guided epidural steroid injection between 19.12.2013 - 28.02.2014, were evaluated retrospectively. Pain levels of patients before the procedure, after 3 weeks and after 6 months were compared using visuel analog scale (VAS). Fifty percent or more decrease, less than 50% decrease and no change in VAS were evaluated as sufficient response, insufficient response and unresponsiveness, respectively. The patients were asked whether they would undergo this process again and “Yes”, “Maybe” and “No” answers were evaluated for patient satisfaction score. Results: In 50 patients (32 female, 18 male), average pain levels were found to be 8.4 (VAS 7-9), 4.3 (VAS 1-9) and 4.4 (VAS 0-9) before the procedure, 3 weeks after the procedure and 6 months after the procedure, respectively. While thirty-seven (74%) of the patients were found to have sufficient response to treatment 3 weeks after the procedure, 10 (20%) patients were found to have insufficient response. There was no response to treatment in 3 (6%) patients. While thirty-five (70%) of the patients were found to have sufficient response to treatment 6 months after the procedure, 10 (20%) patients were found to have insufficient response. Six months after the procedure, there was no response to treatment in 5 patients (%10). Statistically significant improvement was observed when the pre and post-procedure VAS scores were compared. Forty (80%) patients gave the answer “Yes” to the question whether they would undergo this procedure again. Conclusion: We found that fluoroscopic guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection is effective in pain relief in patients with lumbar foraminal intervertebral disc herniation and foraminal stenosis that are resistant to pharmacological and physical therapy and have no absolute indication for surgery.https://www.journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/roneurosurgery/article/view/860Epidural steroid injectionlumbar disc herniationtransforaminal epidural steroid
spellingShingle Zafer Gündoğdu
İbrahim Burak Atcı
Serdal Albayrak
Hakan Yılmaz
Aykut Urfalıoğlu
Evaluation of the clinical efficiency of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of sciatica
Romanian Neurosurgery
Epidural steroid injection
lumbar disc herniation
transforaminal epidural steroid
title Evaluation of the clinical efficiency of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of sciatica
title_full Evaluation of the clinical efficiency of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of sciatica
title_fullStr Evaluation of the clinical efficiency of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of sciatica
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the clinical efficiency of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of sciatica
title_short Evaluation of the clinical efficiency of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of sciatica
title_sort evaluation of the clinical efficiency of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of sciatica
topic Epidural steroid injection
lumbar disc herniation
transforaminal epidural steroid
url https://www.journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/roneurosurgery/article/view/860
work_keys_str_mv AT zafergundogdu evaluationoftheclinicalefficiencyoftransforaminalepiduralsteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofsciatica
AT ibrahimburakatcı evaluationoftheclinicalefficiencyoftransforaminalepiduralsteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofsciatica
AT serdalalbayrak evaluationoftheclinicalefficiencyoftransforaminalepiduralsteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofsciatica
AT hakanyılmaz evaluationoftheclinicalefficiencyoftransforaminalepiduralsteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofsciatica
AT aykuturfalıoglu evaluationoftheclinicalefficiencyoftransforaminalepiduralsteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofsciatica