Gene flow in a national cross-breeding beef population
Future progress in genetic improvement and the monitoring of genetic resources in beef cattle requires a detailed understanding of the population under selection. This study examines the gene flow in the UK beef population with an uncommon breeding structure involving interaction between the beef an...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2011-01-01
|
| Series: | Animal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731111001017 |
| _version_ | 1818622145728610304 |
|---|---|
| author | D.L. Todd J.A. Woolliams T. Roughsedge |
| author_facet | D.L. Todd J.A. Woolliams T. Roughsedge |
| author_sort | D.L. Todd |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Future progress in genetic improvement and the monitoring of genetic resources in beef cattle requires a detailed understanding of the population under selection. This study examines the gene flow in the UK beef population with an uncommon breeding structure involving interaction between the beef and dairy populations. British Cattle Movement Service records were used as the primary source of information, and these data were triangulated with UK government statistics, other industry information sources and existing literature to build up a profile of the UK beef industry. Estimates were made of the breed composition of suckler cows, breeding bulls and the prime slaughter population. Cross-bred animals made up 85% and 94%, respectively, of the commercial beef breeding cow and prime slaughter populations. Holstein/Friesian (through cross-breeding) made up the largest proportion of genes in both these populations with 33% and 28%, respectively. The next five most popular breeds were specialist beef breeds: Limousin (22% and 18%), Charolais (11% and 6%), Simmental (9% and 11%), Angus (7% and 8%) and Belgian Blue (6% and 6%). Combined, the top seven beef breeds accounted for 94% of beef genetics in the prime slaughter population, and 80% of this came from non-native breeds. The influence of dairy breeds in the commercial beef breeding population was highlighted by the fact that 44% of replacement commercial beef breeding females were sourced from beef-sired crosses in the dairy herd, and in total 74% of all maternal grand dams of prime slaughter animals were Holstein/Friesian. The use of selection index technology was also investigated by analysing breeding bull sale results, with the correlation between the terminal sire index and sale price of young breeding bulls being generally moderate but significant, ranging from 0.21 to 0.38 across the major beef breeds. The most influential source of genetics in the commercial suckler beef herd was natural service breeding bulls. These were mostly sourced from pedigree breeders, and accounted for 47.8% of the genetics in the prime beef population. Artificial insemination sires were responsible for 16.6% of prime beef genetics, with the remaining 35.6% coming from dairy breeds, 95% of which was Holstein/Friesian. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T18:20:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3f473ed1301d4000ab89c683d51539ca |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1751-7311 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T18:20:31Z |
| publishDate | 2011-01-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Animal |
| spelling | doaj.art-3f473ed1301d4000ab89c683d51539ca2022-12-21T22:21:35ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112011-01-0151218741886Gene flow in a national cross-breeding beef populationD.L. Todd0J.A. Woolliams1T. Roughsedge2Roslin Institute, Roslin Institute Building, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH29 9RG, UK; Scottish Agriculatural College, Sustainable Livestock Systems, Roslin Institute Building, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH29 9RG, UKRoslin Institute, Roslin Institute Building, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH29 9RG, UKScottish Agriculatural College, Sustainable Livestock Systems, Roslin Institute Building, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH29 9RG, UKFuture progress in genetic improvement and the monitoring of genetic resources in beef cattle requires a detailed understanding of the population under selection. This study examines the gene flow in the UK beef population with an uncommon breeding structure involving interaction between the beef and dairy populations. British Cattle Movement Service records were used as the primary source of information, and these data were triangulated with UK government statistics, other industry information sources and existing literature to build up a profile of the UK beef industry. Estimates were made of the breed composition of suckler cows, breeding bulls and the prime slaughter population. Cross-bred animals made up 85% and 94%, respectively, of the commercial beef breeding cow and prime slaughter populations. Holstein/Friesian (through cross-breeding) made up the largest proportion of genes in both these populations with 33% and 28%, respectively. The next five most popular breeds were specialist beef breeds: Limousin (22% and 18%), Charolais (11% and 6%), Simmental (9% and 11%), Angus (7% and 8%) and Belgian Blue (6% and 6%). Combined, the top seven beef breeds accounted for 94% of beef genetics in the prime slaughter population, and 80% of this came from non-native breeds. The influence of dairy breeds in the commercial beef breeding population was highlighted by the fact that 44% of replacement commercial beef breeding females were sourced from beef-sired crosses in the dairy herd, and in total 74% of all maternal grand dams of prime slaughter animals were Holstein/Friesian. The use of selection index technology was also investigated by analysing breeding bull sale results, with the correlation between the terminal sire index and sale price of young breeding bulls being generally moderate but significant, ranging from 0.21 to 0.38 across the major beef breeds. The most influential source of genetics in the commercial suckler beef herd was natural service breeding bulls. These were mostly sourced from pedigree breeders, and accounted for 47.8% of the genetics in the prime beef population. Artificial insemination sires were responsible for 16.6% of prime beef genetics, with the remaining 35.6% coming from dairy breeds, 95% of which was Holstein/Friesian.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731111001017animal breedingbeef cattlebreedsgene flow |
| spellingShingle | D.L. Todd J.A. Woolliams T. Roughsedge Gene flow in a national cross-breeding beef population Animal animal breeding beef cattle breeds gene flow |
| title | Gene flow in a national cross-breeding beef population |
| title_full | Gene flow in a national cross-breeding beef population |
| title_fullStr | Gene flow in a national cross-breeding beef population |
| title_full_unstemmed | Gene flow in a national cross-breeding beef population |
| title_short | Gene flow in a national cross-breeding beef population |
| title_sort | gene flow in a national cross breeding beef population |
| topic | animal breeding beef cattle breeds gene flow |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731111001017 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dltodd geneflowinanationalcrossbreedingbeefpopulation AT jawoolliams geneflowinanationalcrossbreedingbeefpopulation AT troughsedge geneflowinanationalcrossbreedingbeefpopulation |