Primary stability of implants inserted following sinus lift and bone graft in the posterior of the maxilla
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the primary stability of implants inserted conventionally with those inserted following sinus lift plus bone graft. Materials and Methods: The data consisted of periotest scores from 12 patients (7 women, 5 men, mean age of 47.8±10.4) and 24 implants. Each p...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcr.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jcr/article/view/109 |
_version_ | 1819117778879119360 |
---|---|
author | Mehdi Sezavar Mohammad Reza Soleimanpour Fahimeh Koshki Seyedeh Zahra Shakeri Mohammad Moharrami |
author_facet | Mehdi Sezavar Mohammad Reza Soleimanpour Fahimeh Koshki Seyedeh Zahra Shakeri Mohammad Moharrami |
author_sort | Mehdi Sezavar |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: This study aimed to compare the primary stability of implants inserted conventionally with those inserted following sinus lift plus bone graft.
Materials and Methods: The data consisted of periotest scores from 12 patients (7 women, 5 men, mean age of 47.8±10.4) and 24 implants. Each patient had 1 implant which was inserted
conventionally and another using sinus lift (lateral window) and bone graft, therefore, each patient rolled as control as well as case group for him/herself. Eight patients had surgery on the right side and other 4 on the left side. After 4 months of surgery, primary stability was measured by periotest at 3 points. Radiographs also were served to evaluate success rate of each technique. The patients
were collected from a private clinic during 8 months. Mann-Whitney U test was served for analysis; P-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results: The difference between diameters and lengths of implants between case and control group was insignificant (p>0.05). The mean score of periotest for case and control group was -2.73±1.52 and -4.31 ±1.99 respectively. Although the primary stability was higher in the control group and Mann-Whitney U analysis showed a significant difference (p<0.05), but as both scores were negative, primary stability was acceptable in the case group as well.
Conclusion: Despite the lower primary stability of implants inserted in regions with a sinus lift and graft, the technique is acceptable and clinically efficient.
Key words: Implant, Sinus lift, Graft, Primary stability. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T05:38:24Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3f5166a7cd4242be80076516850e82c1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2345-5489 2345-6213 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T05:38:24Z |
publishDate | 2016-12-01 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research |
spelling | doaj.art-3f5166a7cd4242be80076516850e82c12022-12-21T18:37:16ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Craniomaxillofacial Research2345-54892345-62132016-12-0134Primary stability of implants inserted following sinus lift and bone graft in the posterior of the maxillaMehdi Sezavar0Mohammad Reza Soleimanpour1Fahimeh Koshki2Seyedeh Zahra Shakeri3Mohammad Moharrami4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Azad University of Medical sciences, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Azad University of Medical sciences, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Azad University of Medical sciences, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Azad University of Medical sciences, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran.Craniomaxillofacial Research Center (CMFRC), Shariati Hospital, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Introduction: This study aimed to compare the primary stability of implants inserted conventionally with those inserted following sinus lift plus bone graft. Materials and Methods: The data consisted of periotest scores from 12 patients (7 women, 5 men, mean age of 47.8±10.4) and 24 implants. Each patient had 1 implant which was inserted conventionally and another using sinus lift (lateral window) and bone graft, therefore, each patient rolled as control as well as case group for him/herself. Eight patients had surgery on the right side and other 4 on the left side. After 4 months of surgery, primary stability was measured by periotest at 3 points. Radiographs also were served to evaluate success rate of each technique. The patients were collected from a private clinic during 8 months. Mann-Whitney U test was served for analysis; P-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The difference between diameters and lengths of implants between case and control group was insignificant (p>0.05). The mean score of periotest for case and control group was -2.73±1.52 and -4.31 ±1.99 respectively. Although the primary stability was higher in the control group and Mann-Whitney U analysis showed a significant difference (p<0.05), but as both scores were negative, primary stability was acceptable in the case group as well. Conclusion: Despite the lower primary stability of implants inserted in regions with a sinus lift and graft, the technique is acceptable and clinically efficient. Key words: Implant, Sinus lift, Graft, Primary stability.https://jcr.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jcr/article/view/109ImplantSinus liftGraftPrimary stability. |
spellingShingle | Mehdi Sezavar Mohammad Reza Soleimanpour Fahimeh Koshki Seyedeh Zahra Shakeri Mohammad Moharrami Primary stability of implants inserted following sinus lift and bone graft in the posterior of the maxilla Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research Implant Sinus lift Graft Primary stability. |
title | Primary stability of implants inserted following sinus lift and bone graft in the posterior of the maxilla |
title_full | Primary stability of implants inserted following sinus lift and bone graft in the posterior of the maxilla |
title_fullStr | Primary stability of implants inserted following sinus lift and bone graft in the posterior of the maxilla |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary stability of implants inserted following sinus lift and bone graft in the posterior of the maxilla |
title_short | Primary stability of implants inserted following sinus lift and bone graft in the posterior of the maxilla |
title_sort | primary stability of implants inserted following sinus lift and bone graft in the posterior of the maxilla |
topic | Implant Sinus lift Graft Primary stability. |
url | https://jcr.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jcr/article/view/109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehdisezavar primarystabilityofimplantsinsertedfollowingsinusliftandbonegraftintheposteriorofthemaxilla AT mohammadrezasoleimanpour primarystabilityofimplantsinsertedfollowingsinusliftandbonegraftintheposteriorofthemaxilla AT fahimehkoshki primarystabilityofimplantsinsertedfollowingsinusliftandbonegraftintheposteriorofthemaxilla AT seyedehzahrashakeri primarystabilityofimplantsinsertedfollowingsinusliftandbonegraftintheposteriorofthemaxilla AT mohammadmoharrami primarystabilityofimplantsinsertedfollowingsinusliftandbonegraftintheposteriorofthemaxilla |