Comparing the impact safety between two HMX-based PBX with different binders

Binders play an important role in the safety of plastic bonded explosives (PBX). For the performance improvement of HMX-based explosive, the impact safety for the explosive using thermoplastic polyurethane (Estane5703) as binder, was investigated by comparing with that using fluorine rubber (F2604)....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peng Bao, Jian Li, Zhiwei Han, Han Ma, Boliang Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. 2021-09-01
Series:FirePhysChem
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667134421000328
_version_ 1828086053383176192
author Peng Bao
Jian Li
Zhiwei Han
Han Ma
Boliang Wang
author_facet Peng Bao
Jian Li
Zhiwei Han
Han Ma
Boliang Wang
author_sort Peng Bao
collection DOAJ
description Binders play an important role in the safety of plastic bonded explosives (PBX). For the performance improvement of HMX-based explosive, the impact safety for the explosive using thermoplastic polyurethane (Estane5703) as binder, was investigated by comparing with that using fluorine rubber (F2604). By experiments performed with a self-designed impact test device to measure critical ignition velocity, it was found that the critical ignition velocity (277.36 m/s) of Estane5703-containing explosive was 9.3% higher than that of F2604-containing explosive. By analyzing the particle size distribution and morphological characteristics of the impacted powder, it could also be inferred that Estane5703 binder had better bond behavior than F2604. Beside, combustion characteristics of impacted powder were compared in a closed combustion vessel. The results indicated that the maximum combustion pressure (Pmax) of the Estane5703-containing impacted explosive powder was 56.5% lower than that of F2604-containing impacted explosive powder. The combustion duration of the Estane5703-containing impacted powder was 24.1% longer than that of F2604-containing powder, suggesting that the combustion of the former was milder. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Estane5703-containing explosive has better impact safety than the F2604-containing explosive due to the higher bond strength of Estane5703.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:49:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f533f131b10497ab3945c969ec6d612
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-1344
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:49:45Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.
record_format Article
series FirePhysChem
spelling doaj.art-3f533f131b10497ab3945c969ec6d6122022-12-27T04:40:39ZengKeAi Communications Co. Ltd.FirePhysChem2667-13442021-09-0113139145Comparing the impact safety between two HMX-based PBX with different bindersPeng Bao0Jian Li1Zhiwei Han2Han Ma3Boliang Wang4School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, PR ChinaSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, PR ChinaSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, PR ChinaCorresponding author.; School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, PR ChinaSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, PR ChinaBinders play an important role in the safety of plastic bonded explosives (PBX). For the performance improvement of HMX-based explosive, the impact safety for the explosive using thermoplastic polyurethane (Estane5703) as binder, was investigated by comparing with that using fluorine rubber (F2604). By experiments performed with a self-designed impact test device to measure critical ignition velocity, it was found that the critical ignition velocity (277.36 m/s) of Estane5703-containing explosive was 9.3% higher than that of F2604-containing explosive. By analyzing the particle size distribution and morphological characteristics of the impacted powder, it could also be inferred that Estane5703 binder had better bond behavior than F2604. Beside, combustion characteristics of impacted powder were compared in a closed combustion vessel. The results indicated that the maximum combustion pressure (Pmax) of the Estane5703-containing impacted explosive powder was 56.5% lower than that of F2604-containing impacted explosive powder. The combustion duration of the Estane5703-containing impacted powder was 24.1% longer than that of F2604-containing powder, suggesting that the combustion of the former was milder. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Estane5703-containing explosive has better impact safety than the F2604-containing explosive due to the higher bond strength of Estane5703.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667134421000328BinderEstane5703Critical ignition velocityImpact safetyPBX
spellingShingle Peng Bao
Jian Li
Zhiwei Han
Han Ma
Boliang Wang
Comparing the impact safety between two HMX-based PBX with different binders
FirePhysChem
Binder
Estane5703
Critical ignition velocity
Impact safety
PBX
title Comparing the impact safety between two HMX-based PBX with different binders
title_full Comparing the impact safety between two HMX-based PBX with different binders
title_fullStr Comparing the impact safety between two HMX-based PBX with different binders
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the impact safety between two HMX-based PBX with different binders
title_short Comparing the impact safety between two HMX-based PBX with different binders
title_sort comparing the impact safety between two hmx based pbx with different binders
topic Binder
Estane5703
Critical ignition velocity
Impact safety
PBX
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667134421000328
work_keys_str_mv AT pengbao comparingtheimpactsafetybetweentwohmxbasedpbxwithdifferentbinders
AT jianli comparingtheimpactsafetybetweentwohmxbasedpbxwithdifferentbinders
AT zhiweihan comparingtheimpactsafetybetweentwohmxbasedpbxwithdifferentbinders
AT hanma comparingtheimpactsafetybetweentwohmxbasedpbxwithdifferentbinders
AT boliangwang comparingtheimpactsafetybetweentwohmxbasedpbxwithdifferentbinders