Evaluation of prosthodontic complications in screw-retained and cement-retained crowns in dental implants: An original research

Aim: Single-tooth implant restorations, whether screw-retained or cement-retained, are essential for prosthodontic rehabilitation despite having low design flexibility, cosmetic appeal, and high 5-year survival rates. Materials and Methods: A study involving 14 patients with missing mandibular first...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mansi Rajput, Arshdeep S Kohli, Hina N Abdul, Sunpreet K Sandhu, Radhika Thakkar, Shivani Karre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=609;epage=612;aulast=Rajput
_version_ 1827293079410835456
author Mansi Rajput
Arshdeep S Kohli
Hina N Abdul
Sunpreet K Sandhu
Radhika Thakkar
Shivani Karre
author_facet Mansi Rajput
Arshdeep S Kohli
Hina N Abdul
Sunpreet K Sandhu
Radhika Thakkar
Shivani Karre
author_sort Mansi Rajput
collection DOAJ
description Aim: Single-tooth implant restorations, whether screw-retained or cement-retained, are essential for prosthodontic rehabilitation despite having low design flexibility, cosmetic appeal, and high 5-year survival rates. Materials and Methods: A study involving 14 patients with missing mandibular first molars used 28 implants and cement-retained and screw-retained prostheses. Patients had a single edentulous gap, adequate dental hygiene, and sufficient bone volume at the implant site. The study adhered to the Helsinki Declaration, followed WHO 2007 safety guidelines, and evaluated soft tissue, bone height, and bone loss. Data analysis included the Student's t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test. Results: In patients between the ages of 17 and 46, single-implant restorations were compared with cement- and screw-retained at 6 months. Abutment screw loosening and peri-implant soft-tissue traits did not differ significantly from one another. Conclusion: The study compared screw- and cement-retained implant restorations in 28 single-tooth implant-supported prostheses over a 6-month functional loading period, finding no significant improvement in either approach.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:19:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f581afe07664a3180ea8ef1c72c46d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0975-7406
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:19:14Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-3f581afe07664a3180ea8ef1c72c46d52024-04-04T16:37:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062024-01-0116560961210.4103/jpbs.jpbs_890_23Evaluation of prosthodontic complications in screw-retained and cement-retained crowns in dental implants: An original researchMansi RajputArshdeep S KohliHina N AbdulSunpreet K SandhuRadhika ThakkarShivani KarreAim: Single-tooth implant restorations, whether screw-retained or cement-retained, are essential for prosthodontic rehabilitation despite having low design flexibility, cosmetic appeal, and high 5-year survival rates. Materials and Methods: A study involving 14 patients with missing mandibular first molars used 28 implants and cement-retained and screw-retained prostheses. Patients had a single edentulous gap, adequate dental hygiene, and sufficient bone volume at the implant site. The study adhered to the Helsinki Declaration, followed WHO 2007 safety guidelines, and evaluated soft tissue, bone height, and bone loss. Data analysis included the Student's t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test. Results: In patients between the ages of 17 and 46, single-implant restorations were compared with cement- and screw-retained at 6 months. Abutment screw loosening and peri-implant soft-tissue traits did not differ significantly from one another. Conclusion: The study compared screw- and cement-retained implant restorations in 28 single-tooth implant-supported prostheses over a 6-month functional loading period, finding no significant improvement in either approach.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=609;epage=612;aulast=Rajputcement-retained crownscomplications in screw-retainedevaluation of prosthodontic
spellingShingle Mansi Rajput
Arshdeep S Kohli
Hina N Abdul
Sunpreet K Sandhu
Radhika Thakkar
Shivani Karre
Evaluation of prosthodontic complications in screw-retained and cement-retained crowns in dental implants: An original research
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
cement-retained crowns
complications in screw-retained
evaluation of prosthodontic
title Evaluation of prosthodontic complications in screw-retained and cement-retained crowns in dental implants: An original research
title_full Evaluation of prosthodontic complications in screw-retained and cement-retained crowns in dental implants: An original research
title_fullStr Evaluation of prosthodontic complications in screw-retained and cement-retained crowns in dental implants: An original research
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of prosthodontic complications in screw-retained and cement-retained crowns in dental implants: An original research
title_short Evaluation of prosthodontic complications in screw-retained and cement-retained crowns in dental implants: An original research
title_sort evaluation of prosthodontic complications in screw retained and cement retained crowns in dental implants an original research
topic cement-retained crowns
complications in screw-retained
evaluation of prosthodontic
url http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=609;epage=612;aulast=Rajput
work_keys_str_mv AT mansirajput evaluationofprosthodonticcomplicationsinscrewretainedandcementretainedcrownsindentalimplantsanoriginalresearch
AT arshdeepskohli evaluationofprosthodonticcomplicationsinscrewretainedandcementretainedcrownsindentalimplantsanoriginalresearch
AT hinanabdul evaluationofprosthodonticcomplicationsinscrewretainedandcementretainedcrownsindentalimplantsanoriginalresearch
AT sunpreetksandhu evaluationofprosthodonticcomplicationsinscrewretainedandcementretainedcrownsindentalimplantsanoriginalresearch
AT radhikathakkar evaluationofprosthodonticcomplicationsinscrewretainedandcementretainedcrownsindentalimplantsanoriginalresearch
AT shivanikarre evaluationofprosthodonticcomplicationsinscrewretainedandcementretainedcrownsindentalimplantsanoriginalresearch