Bone healing after median sternotomy: A comparison of two hemostatic devices

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Bone wax is traditionally used as part of surgical procedures to prevent bleeding from exposed spongy bone. It is an effective hemostatic device which creates a physical barrier. Unfortunately it interferes with subsequent bone heali...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vind-Kezunovic Stefan, Jensen Henrik, Vestergaard Rikke F, Jakobsen Thomas, Søballe Kjeld, Hasenkam John M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-11-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Online Access:http://www.cardiothoracicsurgery.org/content/5/1/117
_version_ 1811299086559608832
author Vind-Kezunovic Stefan
Jensen Henrik
Vestergaard Rikke F
Jakobsen Thomas
Søballe Kjeld
Hasenkam John M
author_facet Vind-Kezunovic Stefan
Jensen Henrik
Vestergaard Rikke F
Jakobsen Thomas
Søballe Kjeld
Hasenkam John M
author_sort Vind-Kezunovic Stefan
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Bone wax is traditionally used as part of surgical procedures to prevent bleeding from exposed spongy bone. It is an effective hemostatic device which creates a physical barrier. Unfortunately it interferes with subsequent bone healing and increases the risk of infection in experimental studies. Recently, a water-soluble, synthetic, hemostatic compound (Ostene<sup>®</sup>) was introduced to serve the same purpose as bone wax without hampering bone healing. This study aims to compare sternal healing after application of either bone wax or Ostene<sup>®</sup>.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twenty-four pigs were randomized into one of three treatment groups: Ostene<sup>®</sup>, bone wax or no hemostatic treatment (control). Each animal was subjected to midline sternotomy. Either Ostene<sup>® </sup>or bone wax was applied to the spongy bone surfaces until local hemostasis was ensured. The control group received no hemostatic treatment. The wound was left open for 60 min before closing to simulate conditions alike those of cardiac surgery. All sterni were harvested 6 weeks after intervention.</p> <p>Bone density and the area of the bone defect were determined with peripheral quantitative CT-scanning; bone healing was displayed with plain X-ray and chronic inflammation was histologically assessed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Both CT-scanning and plain X-ray disclosed that bone healing was significantly impaired in the bone wax group (p < 0.01) compared with the other two groups, and the former group had significantly more chronic inflammation (p < 0.01) than the two latter.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Bone wax inhibits bone healing and induces chronic inflammation in a porcine model. Ostene<sup>® </sup>treated animals displayed bone healing characteristics and inflammatory reactions similar to those of the control group without application of a hemostatic agent.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:29:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f596b81149f4386bad829dc895fd70c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-8090
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:29:59Z
publishDate 2010-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-3f596b81149f4386bad829dc895fd70c2022-12-22T02:58:11ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902010-11-015111710.1186/1749-8090-5-117Bone healing after median sternotomy: A comparison of two hemostatic devicesVind-Kezunovic StefanJensen HenrikVestergaard Rikke FJakobsen ThomasSøballe KjeldHasenkam John M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Bone wax is traditionally used as part of surgical procedures to prevent bleeding from exposed spongy bone. It is an effective hemostatic device which creates a physical barrier. Unfortunately it interferes with subsequent bone healing and increases the risk of infection in experimental studies. Recently, a water-soluble, synthetic, hemostatic compound (Ostene<sup>®</sup>) was introduced to serve the same purpose as bone wax without hampering bone healing. This study aims to compare sternal healing after application of either bone wax or Ostene<sup>®</sup>.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twenty-four pigs were randomized into one of three treatment groups: Ostene<sup>®</sup>, bone wax or no hemostatic treatment (control). Each animal was subjected to midline sternotomy. Either Ostene<sup>® </sup>or bone wax was applied to the spongy bone surfaces until local hemostasis was ensured. The control group received no hemostatic treatment. The wound was left open for 60 min before closing to simulate conditions alike those of cardiac surgery. All sterni were harvested 6 weeks after intervention.</p> <p>Bone density and the area of the bone defect were determined with peripheral quantitative CT-scanning; bone healing was displayed with plain X-ray and chronic inflammation was histologically assessed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Both CT-scanning and plain X-ray disclosed that bone healing was significantly impaired in the bone wax group (p < 0.01) compared with the other two groups, and the former group had significantly more chronic inflammation (p < 0.01) than the two latter.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Bone wax inhibits bone healing and induces chronic inflammation in a porcine model. Ostene<sup>® </sup>treated animals displayed bone healing characteristics and inflammatory reactions similar to those of the control group without application of a hemostatic agent.</p>http://www.cardiothoracicsurgery.org/content/5/1/117
spellingShingle Vind-Kezunovic Stefan
Jensen Henrik
Vestergaard Rikke F
Jakobsen Thomas
Søballe Kjeld
Hasenkam John M
Bone healing after median sternotomy: A comparison of two hemostatic devices
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
title Bone healing after median sternotomy: A comparison of two hemostatic devices
title_full Bone healing after median sternotomy: A comparison of two hemostatic devices
title_fullStr Bone healing after median sternotomy: A comparison of two hemostatic devices
title_full_unstemmed Bone healing after median sternotomy: A comparison of two hemostatic devices
title_short Bone healing after median sternotomy: A comparison of two hemostatic devices
title_sort bone healing after median sternotomy a comparison of two hemostatic devices
url http://www.cardiothoracicsurgery.org/content/5/1/117
work_keys_str_mv AT vindkezunovicstefan bonehealingaftermediansternotomyacomparisonoftwohemostaticdevices
AT jensenhenrik bonehealingaftermediansternotomyacomparisonoftwohemostaticdevices
AT vestergaardrikkef bonehealingaftermediansternotomyacomparisonoftwohemostaticdevices
AT jakobsenthomas bonehealingaftermediansternotomyacomparisonoftwohemostaticdevices
AT søballekjeld bonehealingaftermediansternotomyacomparisonoftwohemostaticdevices
AT hasenkamjohnm bonehealingaftermediansternotomyacomparisonoftwohemostaticdevices