Drivers of Home Care Agency Closure: Evidence from England
Context: Hundreds of thousands of people in England with long-term care needs are supported by more than 10,000 home care agencies. However, little is known about the market dynamics of home care supply, either in England or internationally. Objective: To understand the reasons for home care agen...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
LSE Press
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Long-Term Care |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://account.journal.ilpnetwork.org/index.php/lse-j-jltc/article/view/193 |
| _version_ | 1797268900437557248 |
|---|---|
| author | Stephen Allan |
| author_facet | Stephen Allan |
| author_sort | Stephen Allan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Context: Hundreds of thousands of people in England with long-term care needs are supported by more than 10,000 home care agencies. However, little is known about the market dynamics of home care supply, either in England or internationally.
Objective: To understand the reasons for home care agency closure in England.
Method: Regression analysis of the future status of home care agencies open in the period 2015–2017 using a panel dataset of 98% of all agencies registered to provide care in England. Measures of quality, competition and other local area demand and supply factors, e.g. population, needs and rurality, were included in the analysis. Instrumental variable methods were used to address endogeneity in the relationship between closure and both competition and quality.
Findings: Fourteen point two per cent of home care agencies had closed one year after observation, with some differences observed by region. Regression analysis confirmed that higher competition and lower quality significantly increased closure likelihood. A new agency locating immediately next to the average provider would increase the likelihood of closure of the existing agency by a quarter. Independent agencies and those which supported a local population with higher needs had significantly reduced chance of closure.
Limitations: There were data limitations to the analysis, with no information on size of agencies and assumptions made on where they delivered care.
Implications: Competitive effects in home care markets must be carefully considered given the importance of ensuring equitable access to care. The findings also confirm the importance of quality regulation in long-term care.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-25T01:39:50Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3f658fa98c4a4572a24664d07cbc7788 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2516-9122 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-25T01:39:50Z |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | LSE Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Long-Term Care |
| spelling | doaj.art-3f658fa98c4a4572a24664d07cbc77882024-03-08T05:45:41ZengLSE PressJournal of Long-Term Care2516-91222024-03-0110.31389/jltc.193Drivers of Home Care Agency Closure: Evidence from EnglandStephen Allan0Senior Research Fellow, PSSRU, University of Kent, CT2 7NF Context: Hundreds of thousands of people in England with long-term care needs are supported by more than 10,000 home care agencies. However, little is known about the market dynamics of home care supply, either in England or internationally. Objective: To understand the reasons for home care agency closure in England. Method: Regression analysis of the future status of home care agencies open in the period 2015–2017 using a panel dataset of 98% of all agencies registered to provide care in England. Measures of quality, competition and other local area demand and supply factors, e.g. population, needs and rurality, were included in the analysis. Instrumental variable methods were used to address endogeneity in the relationship between closure and both competition and quality. Findings: Fourteen point two per cent of home care agencies had closed one year after observation, with some differences observed by region. Regression analysis confirmed that higher competition and lower quality significantly increased closure likelihood. A new agency locating immediately next to the average provider would increase the likelihood of closure of the existing agency by a quarter. Independent agencies and those which supported a local population with higher needs had significantly reduced chance of closure. Limitations: There were data limitations to the analysis, with no information on size of agencies and assumptions made on where they delivered care. Implications: Competitive effects in home care markets must be carefully considered given the importance of ensuring equitable access to care. The findings also confirm the importance of quality regulation in long-term care. https://account.journal.ilpnetwork.org/index.php/lse-j-jltc/article/view/193Home careBusinessClosureCompetitionQuality |
| spellingShingle | Stephen Allan Drivers of Home Care Agency Closure: Evidence from England Journal of Long-Term Care Home care Business Closure Competition Quality |
| title | Drivers of Home Care Agency Closure: Evidence from England |
| title_full | Drivers of Home Care Agency Closure: Evidence from England |
| title_fullStr | Drivers of Home Care Agency Closure: Evidence from England |
| title_full_unstemmed | Drivers of Home Care Agency Closure: Evidence from England |
| title_short | Drivers of Home Care Agency Closure: Evidence from England |
| title_sort | drivers of home care agency closure evidence from england |
| topic | Home care Business Closure Competition Quality |
| url | https://account.journal.ilpnetwork.org/index.php/lse-j-jltc/article/view/193 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stephenallan driversofhomecareagencyclosureevidencefromengland |