An Assessment of the Hopping Strategy and Inter-Limb Asymmetry during the Triple Hop Test: A Test–Retest Pilot Study

The aims of the present study are to: (1) determine within- and between-session reliability of multiple metrics obtained during the triple hop test; and (2) determine any systematic bias in both the test and inter-limb asymmetry scores for these metrics. Thirteen male young American football athlete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyle Davey, Paul Read, Joseph Coyne, Paul Jarvis, Anthony Turner, Jon Brazier, Nejc Šarabon, Matthew J. Jordan, Chris Bishop
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Symmetry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/10/1890
_version_ 1797513052821651456
author Kyle Davey
Paul Read
Joseph Coyne
Paul Jarvis
Anthony Turner
Jon Brazier
Nejc Šarabon
Matthew J. Jordan
Chris Bishop
author_facet Kyle Davey
Paul Read
Joseph Coyne
Paul Jarvis
Anthony Turner
Jon Brazier
Nejc Šarabon
Matthew J. Jordan
Chris Bishop
author_sort Kyle Davey
collection DOAJ
description The aims of the present study are to: (1) determine within- and between-session reliability of multiple metrics obtained during the triple hop test; and (2) determine any systematic bias in both the test and inter-limb asymmetry scores for these metrics. Thirteen male young American football athletes performed three trials of a triple hop test on each leg on two separate occasions. In addition to the total distance hopped, manual detection of touch down and toe-off were calculated via video analysis, enabling flight time (for each hop), ground contact time (GCT), reactive strength index (RSI), and leg stiffness (between hops) to be calculated. Results showed all coefficient of variation (CV) values were ≤ 10.67% and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranged from moderate to excellent (0.53–0.95) in both test sessions. Intrarater reliability showed excellent reliability for all metrics (CV ≤ 3.60%, ICC ≥ 0.97). No systematic bias was evident between test sessions for raw test scores (<i>g</i> = −0.34 to 0.32) or the magnitude of asymmetry (<i>g</i> = −0.19 to 0.43). However, ‘real’ changes in asymmetry (i.e., greater than the CV in session 1) were evident on an individual level for all metrics. For the direction of asymmetry, kappa coefficients revealed poor-to-fair levels of agreement between test sessions for all metrics (K = −0.10 to 0.39), with the exception of the first hop (K = 0.69). These data show that, given the inherent limitations of distance jumped in the triple hop test, practitioners can confidently gather a range of reliable data when computed manually, provided sufficient test familiarization is conducted. In addition, although the magnitude of asymmetry appears to show only small changes between test sessions, limb dominance does appear to fluctuate between test sessions, highlighting the value of also monitoring the direction of the imbalance.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:10:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f8afcc96bd24aeaa535b4ac3f1ce5ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-8994
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:10:18Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Symmetry
spelling doaj.art-3f8afcc96bd24aeaa535b4ac3f1ce5ba2023-11-22T20:10:38ZengMDPI AGSymmetry2073-89942021-10-011310189010.3390/sym13101890An Assessment of the Hopping Strategy and Inter-Limb Asymmetry during the Triple Hop Test: A Test–Retest Pilot StudyKyle Davey0Paul Read1Joseph Coyne2Paul Jarvis3Anthony Turner4Jon Brazier5Nejc Šarabon6Matthew J. Jordan7Chris Bishop8Northwest Rehabilitation Associates, Salem, OR 97302, USAInstitute for Sport Exercise and Health, Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7HA, UKSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, AustraliaFaculty of Science and Technology, London Sport Institute, Middlesex University, London NW4 4BT, UKFaculty of Science and Technology, London Sport Institute, Middlesex University, London NW4 4BT, UKSchool of Life and Medical Science, De Havilland Campus, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9EU, UKFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, 6310 Izola, SloveniaFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaFaculty of Science and Technology, London Sport Institute, Middlesex University, London NW4 4BT, UKThe aims of the present study are to: (1) determine within- and between-session reliability of multiple metrics obtained during the triple hop test; and (2) determine any systematic bias in both the test and inter-limb asymmetry scores for these metrics. Thirteen male young American football athletes performed three trials of a triple hop test on each leg on two separate occasions. In addition to the total distance hopped, manual detection of touch down and toe-off were calculated via video analysis, enabling flight time (for each hop), ground contact time (GCT), reactive strength index (RSI), and leg stiffness (between hops) to be calculated. Results showed all coefficient of variation (CV) values were ≤ 10.67% and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranged from moderate to excellent (0.53–0.95) in both test sessions. Intrarater reliability showed excellent reliability for all metrics (CV ≤ 3.60%, ICC ≥ 0.97). No systematic bias was evident between test sessions for raw test scores (<i>g</i> = −0.34 to 0.32) or the magnitude of asymmetry (<i>g</i> = −0.19 to 0.43). However, ‘real’ changes in asymmetry (i.e., greater than the CV in session 1) were evident on an individual level for all metrics. For the direction of asymmetry, kappa coefficients revealed poor-to-fair levels of agreement between test sessions for all metrics (K = −0.10 to 0.39), with the exception of the first hop (K = 0.69). These data show that, given the inherent limitations of distance jumped in the triple hop test, practitioners can confidently gather a range of reliable data when computed manually, provided sufficient test familiarization is conducted. In addition, although the magnitude of asymmetry appears to show only small changes between test sessions, limb dominance does appear to fluctuate between test sessions, highlighting the value of also monitoring the direction of the imbalance.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/10/1890triple hop testreactive strength indexleg stiffnessstrategy metrics
spellingShingle Kyle Davey
Paul Read
Joseph Coyne
Paul Jarvis
Anthony Turner
Jon Brazier
Nejc Šarabon
Matthew J. Jordan
Chris Bishop
An Assessment of the Hopping Strategy and Inter-Limb Asymmetry during the Triple Hop Test: A Test–Retest Pilot Study
Symmetry
triple hop test
reactive strength index
leg stiffness
strategy metrics
title An Assessment of the Hopping Strategy and Inter-Limb Asymmetry during the Triple Hop Test: A Test–Retest Pilot Study
title_full An Assessment of the Hopping Strategy and Inter-Limb Asymmetry during the Triple Hop Test: A Test–Retest Pilot Study
title_fullStr An Assessment of the Hopping Strategy and Inter-Limb Asymmetry during the Triple Hop Test: A Test–Retest Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of the Hopping Strategy and Inter-Limb Asymmetry during the Triple Hop Test: A Test–Retest Pilot Study
title_short An Assessment of the Hopping Strategy and Inter-Limb Asymmetry during the Triple Hop Test: A Test–Retest Pilot Study
title_sort assessment of the hopping strategy and inter limb asymmetry during the triple hop test a test retest pilot study
topic triple hop test
reactive strength index
leg stiffness
strategy metrics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/10/1890
work_keys_str_mv AT kyledavey anassessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT paulread anassessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT josephcoyne anassessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT pauljarvis anassessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT anthonyturner anassessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT jonbrazier anassessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT nejcsarabon anassessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT matthewjjordan anassessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT chrisbishop anassessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT kyledavey assessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT paulread assessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT josephcoyne assessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT pauljarvis assessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT anthonyturner assessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT jonbrazier assessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT nejcsarabon assessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT matthewjjordan assessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy
AT chrisbishop assessmentofthehoppingstrategyandinterlimbasymmetryduringthetriplehoptestatestretestpilotstudy