The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes
There is growing concern that some bee populations are in decline, potentially threatening pollination security in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes. Among the numerous causes associated with this trend, nutritional stress resulting from a mismatch between bee nutritional needs and plant...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019-02-01
|
| Series: | PeerJ |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/6329.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797419158354264064 |
|---|---|
| author | Tobias Pamminger Roland Becker Sophie Himmelreich Christof W. Schneider Matthias Bergtold |
| author_facet | Tobias Pamminger Roland Becker Sophie Himmelreich Christof W. Schneider Matthias Bergtold |
| author_sort | Tobias Pamminger |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | There is growing concern that some bee populations are in decline, potentially threatening pollination security in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes. Among the numerous causes associated with this trend, nutritional stress resulting from a mismatch between bee nutritional needs and plant community provisioning has been suggested as one potential driver. To ease nutritional stress on bee populations in agricultural habitats, agri-environmental protection schemes aim to provide alternative nutritional resources for bee populations during times of need. However, such efforts have focused mainly on quantity (providing flowering plants) and timing (during flower-scarce periods), while largely ignoring the quality of the offered flower resources. In a first step to start addressing this information gap, we have used literature data to compile a comprehensive geographically explicit dataset on nectar quality (i.e., total sugar concentration), offered to bees both within fields (crop and weed species) as well as outside fields (wild species) around the globe. Social bees are particularly sensitive to nectar sugar concentrations, which directly impact calorie influx into the colony and consequently their fitness making it an important resource quality marker. We find that the total nectar sugar concentrations in general do not differ between the three plant communities studied. In contrast we find increased variability in nectar quality in the wild plant community compared to crop and weed community, which is likely explained by the increased phylogenetic diversity in this category of plants. In a second step we explore the influence of local habitat on nectar quality and its variability utilizing a detailed sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) data set and find that geography has a small, but significant influence on these parameters. In a third step we identify crop groups (genera), which provide sub-optimal nectar resources for bees and suggest high quality alternatives as potential nectar supplements. In the long term this data set could serve as a starting point to systematically collect more quality characteristics of plant provided resources to bees, which ultimately can be utilized by scientist, regulators, NGOs and farmers to improve the flower resources offered to bees. We hope that ultimately this data will help to ease nutritional stress for bee populations and foster a data informed discussion about pollinator conservation in modern agricultural landscapes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:44:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3f98822df091480794a000bd0103b3f2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2167-8359 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:44:10Z |
| publishDate | 2019-02-01 |
| publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PeerJ |
| spelling | doaj.art-3f98822df091480794a000bd0103b3f22023-12-03T10:41:12ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-02-017e632910.7717/peerj.6329The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapesTobias PammingerRoland BeckerSophie HimmelreichChristof W. SchneiderMatthias BergtoldThere is growing concern that some bee populations are in decline, potentially threatening pollination security in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes. Among the numerous causes associated with this trend, nutritional stress resulting from a mismatch between bee nutritional needs and plant community provisioning has been suggested as one potential driver. To ease nutritional stress on bee populations in agricultural habitats, agri-environmental protection schemes aim to provide alternative nutritional resources for bee populations during times of need. However, such efforts have focused mainly on quantity (providing flowering plants) and timing (during flower-scarce periods), while largely ignoring the quality of the offered flower resources. In a first step to start addressing this information gap, we have used literature data to compile a comprehensive geographically explicit dataset on nectar quality (i.e., total sugar concentration), offered to bees both within fields (crop and weed species) as well as outside fields (wild species) around the globe. Social bees are particularly sensitive to nectar sugar concentrations, which directly impact calorie influx into the colony and consequently their fitness making it an important resource quality marker. We find that the total nectar sugar concentrations in general do not differ between the three plant communities studied. In contrast we find increased variability in nectar quality in the wild plant community compared to crop and weed community, which is likely explained by the increased phylogenetic diversity in this category of plants. In a second step we explore the influence of local habitat on nectar quality and its variability utilizing a detailed sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) data set and find that geography has a small, but significant influence on these parameters. In a third step we identify crop groups (genera), which provide sub-optimal nectar resources for bees and suggest high quality alternatives as potential nectar supplements. In the long term this data set could serve as a starting point to systematically collect more quality characteristics of plant provided resources to bees, which ultimately can be utilized by scientist, regulators, NGOs and farmers to improve the flower resources offered to bees. We hope that ultimately this data will help to ease nutritional stress for bee populations and foster a data informed discussion about pollinator conservation in modern agricultural landscapes.https://peerj.com/articles/6329.pdfNectar qualityHymenopteraFlower resources |
| spellingShingle | Tobias Pamminger Roland Becker Sophie Himmelreich Christof W. Schneider Matthias Bergtold The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes PeerJ Nectar quality Hymenoptera Flower resources |
| title | The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes |
| title_full | The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes |
| title_fullStr | The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes |
| title_full_unstemmed | The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes |
| title_short | The nectar report: quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes |
| title_sort | nectar report quantitative review of nectar sugar concentrations offered by bee visited flowers in agricultural and non agricultural landscapes |
| topic | Nectar quality Hymenoptera Flower resources |
| url | https://peerj.com/articles/6329.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tobiaspamminger thenectarreportquantitativereviewofnectarsugarconcentrationsofferedbybeevisitedflowersinagriculturalandnonagriculturallandscapes AT rolandbecker thenectarreportquantitativereviewofnectarsugarconcentrationsofferedbybeevisitedflowersinagriculturalandnonagriculturallandscapes AT sophiehimmelreich thenectarreportquantitativereviewofnectarsugarconcentrationsofferedbybeevisitedflowersinagriculturalandnonagriculturallandscapes AT christofwschneider thenectarreportquantitativereviewofnectarsugarconcentrationsofferedbybeevisitedflowersinagriculturalandnonagriculturallandscapes AT matthiasbergtold thenectarreportquantitativereviewofnectarsugarconcentrationsofferedbybeevisitedflowersinagriculturalandnonagriculturallandscapes AT tobiaspamminger nectarreportquantitativereviewofnectarsugarconcentrationsofferedbybeevisitedflowersinagriculturalandnonagriculturallandscapes AT rolandbecker nectarreportquantitativereviewofnectarsugarconcentrationsofferedbybeevisitedflowersinagriculturalandnonagriculturallandscapes AT sophiehimmelreich nectarreportquantitativereviewofnectarsugarconcentrationsofferedbybeevisitedflowersinagriculturalandnonagriculturallandscapes AT christofwschneider nectarreportquantitativereviewofnectarsugarconcentrationsofferedbybeevisitedflowersinagriculturalandnonagriculturallandscapes AT matthiasbergtold nectarreportquantitativereviewofnectarsugarconcentrationsofferedbybeevisitedflowersinagriculturalandnonagriculturallandscapes |