Czy o to walczyliśmy?

Have We Fought for This? American Dispute over History: Between Republican and Liberal Narrative in the Studies of Political Thought Modern reading of political thought of the American Revolution is very diverse. The aim of the article is twofold. Firstly, it is to present interpretations which fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Łukasz Dulęba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2017-06-01
Series:Politeja
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/1668
_version_ 1818903936551092224
author Łukasz Dulęba
author_facet Łukasz Dulęba
author_sort Łukasz Dulęba
collection DOAJ
description Have We Fought for This? American Dispute over History: Between Republican and Liberal Narrative in the Studies of Political Thought Modern reading of political thought of the American Revolution is very diverse. The aim of the article is twofold. Firstly, it is to present interpretations which form the canon of modern political thought. Secondly, I intend to confront these perspectives. The authors who represent the republican view (B. Bailyn, G.S. Wood, J.G.A. Pocock) aim to present pre‑revolutionary era as a time deeply rooted in classic republican pattern. An ideological end of republican vision fall during the boost of commercial relations, which in the meantime had changed the hierarchy of values. The liberal myth, which had one of its most important propagators in Louis Hartz, has aimed to prove the strength and continuity, which was called “possessive individualism”. The paper attempts to disprove the idea of domination of liberal values during the beginnings of the United States.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T20:59:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3f9d9bf76e8f417bbd74701c8fb729fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1733-6716
2391-6737
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T20:59:28Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
record_format Article
series Politeja
spelling doaj.art-3f9d9bf76e8f417bbd74701c8fb729fc2022-12-21T20:05:50ZengKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingPoliteja1733-67162391-67372017-06-01143(48)10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.48.08Czy o to walczyliśmy?Łukasz Dulęba0Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w PoznaniuHave We Fought for This? American Dispute over History: Between Republican and Liberal Narrative in the Studies of Political Thought Modern reading of political thought of the American Revolution is very diverse. The aim of the article is twofold. Firstly, it is to present interpretations which form the canon of modern political thought. Secondly, I intend to confront these perspectives. The authors who represent the republican view (B. Bailyn, G.S. Wood, J.G.A. Pocock) aim to present pre‑revolutionary era as a time deeply rooted in classic republican pattern. An ideological end of republican vision fall during the boost of commercial relations, which in the meantime had changed the hierarchy of values. The liberal myth, which had one of its most important propagators in Louis Hartz, has aimed to prove the strength and continuity, which was called “possessive individualism”. The paper attempts to disprove the idea of domination of liberal values during the beginnings of the United States.https://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/1668republikanizmliberalizmrewolucja amerykańskaJohn LockeLouis HartzJohn Pocock
spellingShingle Łukasz Dulęba
Czy o to walczyliśmy?
Politeja
republikanizm
liberalizm
rewolucja amerykańska
John Locke
Louis Hartz
John Pocock
title Czy o to walczyliśmy?
title_full Czy o to walczyliśmy?
title_fullStr Czy o to walczyliśmy?
title_full_unstemmed Czy o to walczyliśmy?
title_short Czy o to walczyliśmy?
title_sort czy o to walczylismy
topic republikanizm
liberalizm
rewolucja amerykańska
John Locke
Louis Hartz
John Pocock
url https://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/1668
work_keys_str_mv AT łukaszduleba czyotowalczylismy