The 3 × 2 Achievement Goals in the Education, Sport, and Occupation Literatures: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Achievement goal theory has been a dominant motivation framework since the 1980s. The 3 × 2 achievement goal framework emerged in the literature in 2011. We aimed to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines of the 3 × 2 achievement goal research in education, sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marc Lochbaum, Cassandra Sisneros, Zişan Kazak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/13/7/85
_version_ 1797589513922412544
author Marc Lochbaum
Cassandra Sisneros
Zişan Kazak
author_facet Marc Lochbaum
Cassandra Sisneros
Zişan Kazak
author_sort Marc Lochbaum
collection DOAJ
description Achievement goal theory has been a dominant motivation framework since the 1980s. The 3 × 2 achievement goal framework emerged in the literature in 2011. We aimed to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines of the 3 × 2 achievement goal research in education, sport, and occupation settings. We retrieved articles from searching EBSCOhost and Google Scholar platforms. Eligible articles contained the 3 × 2 achievement goal in education, sport, or occupation, were published in a peer-reviewed journal, and provided mean data or correlate data. We tested hypotheses concerned with (1) the overall pattern of achievement goal endorsement, (2) achievement goal differences by domain (education, sport) and compulsory nature of the domains or sub-domains, and (3) achievement goal relationships with correlates (e.g., learning strategies, motivations, performance). After screening, 56 articles met all inclusion criteria, providing 58 samples across education (<i>n</i> = 44), sport (<i>n</i> = 10), and occupation (<i>n</i> = 4) settings with 35,031 unique participants from 15 countries. Participants endorsed the task- and self-approach goals more than the counterpart avoidance goals, other-avoidance goals more than other-approach goals, and the intercorrelations and reliability coefficients were acceptable. Minimal impact results from examining within and across study bias statistics. Of importance, the domain (i.e., education, sport) and the compulsory nature of the domain or sub-domains (i.e., primary-secondary education, sport) moderated goal endorsement (group mixed-effects <i>p</i> < 0.05, <i>g</i> values medium to very large). These groupings also moderated the other goal differences. Concerning our correlates analyses, most meta-analyzed correlations among the achievement goals and correlates were small in meaningfulness with the largest correlations (0.30–0.42) between the approach goals merged and the task- and self-approach goals and facilitative learning strategies and desired motivations. In conclusion, the 3 × 2 achievement goals literature is diverse. Furthering the study and application of this model requires overcoming inherent limitations (i.e., consistent response scale sets), teasing out differences between the task- and self-goals, measuring performance outcomes, and cross-cultural collaborations.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:08:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3fa5c9757962408ebdf68472bdd24081
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2174-8144
2254-9625
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:08:36Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
spelling doaj.art-3fa5c9757962408ebdf68472bdd240812023-11-18T19:04:09ZengMDPI AGEuropean Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education2174-81442254-96252023-06-011371130115710.3390/ejihpe13070085The 3 × 2 Achievement Goals in the Education, Sport, and Occupation Literatures: A Systematic Review with Meta-AnalysisMarc Lochbaum0Cassandra Sisneros1Zişan Kazak2Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USADepartment of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USAFaculty of Sport Science, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir 35100, TurkeyAchievement goal theory has been a dominant motivation framework since the 1980s. The 3 × 2 achievement goal framework emerged in the literature in 2011. We aimed to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines of the 3 × 2 achievement goal research in education, sport, and occupation settings. We retrieved articles from searching EBSCOhost and Google Scholar platforms. Eligible articles contained the 3 × 2 achievement goal in education, sport, or occupation, were published in a peer-reviewed journal, and provided mean data or correlate data. We tested hypotheses concerned with (1) the overall pattern of achievement goal endorsement, (2) achievement goal differences by domain (education, sport) and compulsory nature of the domains or sub-domains, and (3) achievement goal relationships with correlates (e.g., learning strategies, motivations, performance). After screening, 56 articles met all inclusion criteria, providing 58 samples across education (<i>n</i> = 44), sport (<i>n</i> = 10), and occupation (<i>n</i> = 4) settings with 35,031 unique participants from 15 countries. Participants endorsed the task- and self-approach goals more than the counterpart avoidance goals, other-avoidance goals more than other-approach goals, and the intercorrelations and reliability coefficients were acceptable. Minimal impact results from examining within and across study bias statistics. Of importance, the domain (i.e., education, sport) and the compulsory nature of the domain or sub-domains (i.e., primary-secondary education, sport) moderated goal endorsement (group mixed-effects <i>p</i> < 0.05, <i>g</i> values medium to very large). These groupings also moderated the other goal differences. Concerning our correlates analyses, most meta-analyzed correlations among the achievement goals and correlates were small in meaningfulness with the largest correlations (0.30–0.42) between the approach goals merged and the task- and self-approach goals and facilitative learning strategies and desired motivations. In conclusion, the 3 × 2 achievement goals literature is diverse. Furthering the study and application of this model requires overcoming inherent limitations (i.e., consistent response scale sets), teasing out differences between the task- and self-goals, measuring performance outcomes, and cross-cultural collaborations.https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/13/7/85motivationapproach goalsavoidance goalstask goalsself-goalsother goals
spellingShingle Marc Lochbaum
Cassandra Sisneros
Zişan Kazak
The 3 × 2 Achievement Goals in the Education, Sport, and Occupation Literatures: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
motivation
approach goals
avoidance goals
task goals
self-goals
other goals
title The 3 × 2 Achievement Goals in the Education, Sport, and Occupation Literatures: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_full The 3 × 2 Achievement Goals in the Education, Sport, and Occupation Literatures: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The 3 × 2 Achievement Goals in the Education, Sport, and Occupation Literatures: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The 3 × 2 Achievement Goals in the Education, Sport, and Occupation Literatures: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_short The 3 × 2 Achievement Goals in the Education, Sport, and Occupation Literatures: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_sort 3 2 achievement goals in the education sport and occupation literatures a systematic review with meta analysis
topic motivation
approach goals
avoidance goals
task goals
self-goals
other goals
url https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/13/7/85
work_keys_str_mv AT marclochbaum the32achievementgoalsintheeducationsportandoccupationliteraturesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT cassandrasisneros the32achievementgoalsintheeducationsportandoccupationliteraturesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT zisankazak the32achievementgoalsintheeducationsportandoccupationliteraturesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT marclochbaum 32achievementgoalsintheeducationsportandoccupationliteraturesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT cassandrasisneros 32achievementgoalsintheeducationsportandoccupationliteraturesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT zisankazak 32achievementgoalsintheeducationsportandoccupationliteraturesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis