Structural hemodynamic valve deterioration durability of RESILIA-tissue versus contemporary aortic bioprostheses

Structural hemodynamic valve deterioration durability of RESILIA-tissue versus contemporary aortic bioprostheses

Aim: Durability of aortic valve replacement is becoming increasingly important. Aortic bioprostheses with RESILIA tissue have demonstrated outstanding outcomes thus far, but only in single-arm studies. Methods: We compared structural valve deterioration (SVD)-related hemodynamic valve deterioratio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Krzysztof Bartus, Joseph E Bavaria, Vinod H Thourani, Ke Xu, Eric L Keuffel
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Becaris Publishing Limited 2023-01-01
Series:	Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Subjects:	aortic valve replacement hemodynamic valve deterioration inspiris resilia aortic valve resilia tissue structural hemodynamic valve deterioration

Similar Items

Early and late clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of aortic valve replacement using the Inspiris Resilia bioprosthesis
by: Ahmed Ahmed, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)

Current definitions of hemodynamic structural valve deterioration after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement lack consistencyCentral MessagePerspective
by: Bart J.J. Velders, MD, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)

Mid-term outcomes of the COMMENCE trial investigating mitral valve replacement using a bioprosthesis with a novel tissueCentral MessagePerspective
by: David A. Heimansohn, MD, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Clinical outcomes, hemodynamics, and leaflet thrombosis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with novel intra‐annular devices
by: Juri Iwata, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)

The importance of tissue science and valve design in relation to durability and hemodynamics of the DurAVR aortic heart valve
by: William M. L. Neethling, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)

Characteristic calcification behavior of five surgical aortic valve bioprostheses models: An in vitro study
by: Najla Sadat, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)

Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes and Hemodynamic Performances of Trifecta and Perimount Bioprostheses following Aortic Valve Replacement
by: Francesca Toto, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Three-year outcomes of surgical valve replacement with Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis: Dafodil™-1 trial
by: Channabasavaraj Shivalingaiah Hiremath, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01)

Valve-in-valve procedures for degenerated surgical and transcatheter aortic valve bioprostheses using a latest-generation self-expanding intra-annular transcatheter heart valve
by: Andreas Schaefer, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Oxidative Stress in Structural Valve Deterioration: A Longitudinal Clinical Study
by: Manuel Galiñanes, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Circulatory efficiency in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis before and after aortic valve replacement
by: S. Nordmeyer, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Impact of new technologies and experience on procedural aspects of surgical aortic valve replacement – a process analysis
by: Bettina Langhammer, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01)

Long‐Term Durability of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prostheses in Patients With Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve
by: Hong‐De Li, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement on a self-expandable nitinol frame due to degeneration of primary bioprosthetic valve cusps. Clinical case of a high-risk surgical female patient
by: L. S. Kokov, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Bioprostheses and Mechanical Prostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 65 Years Offer Similar Long-Term Survival Rates
by: Tomáš Toporcer, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)

Left Coronary Ostial Obstruction by a Dislocated Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis: Redo Aortic Valve Replacement with Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: A Case Report
by: Seungmo Yoo, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Prevention by the CXCR2 antagonist SCH527123 of the calcification of porcine heart valve cusps implanted subcutaneously in rats
by: Yuthiline Chabry, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Dysregulation of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Does Not Depend on Hemodynamic Alterations in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy
by: Simon Gauer, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Long Term Outcomes and Durability of Bioprosthetic Valve for Valve Replacement at Siriraj Hospital
by: Wanchai Wongkornrat, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Transcatheter “valve-in-valve” implantation of bioprosthesis in failed surgical tricuspid bioprosthesis (first experience in Russia)
by: T. E. Imaev, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Why Does the NOTION Trial Show Poorer than Expected Outcomes in the Surgical Arm?
by: Stefano Urso, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Rethinking mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: new paradigms in design and testing
by: Sreyashi Chakraborty, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)

Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Perimount sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective, propensity-matched study
by: Sharan J Kapadia, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: Classifications, Treatments, and Emerging Transcatheter Paradigms
by: Ankur Kalra, MD, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Clinical case: aortic valve replacement with aortic root reconstruction and coronary artery bypass grafting in 73-yo obese female patient
by: D. V. Borisov, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Therapy for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis
by: Nalin H. Dayawansa, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Acute Pulmonary Edema After Double Mechanical Valve Replacement
by: Audrey Poulat, MD, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

Left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement or repair in bicuspid aortic valve with moderate or greater aortic regurgitationCentral MessagePerspective
by: Jonathan D. Kochav, MD, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)

Role of sutureless aortic valve replacement in the era of transcatheter valves
by: B. S. Tsaroev, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Impact of reintervention after index aortic valve replacement on the risk of subsequent mortalityCentral MessagePerspective
by: William Y. Shi, MD, PhD, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and concomitant mitral valve regurgitation – 5 years follow-up
by: Rafael Henrique Rangel, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)

Vascular complications after transcatheter transfemoral aortic valve implantation: Modified sheath-to-femoral artery ratio as a new predictor
by: Sinem Çakal, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable biosprosthesis in patients with bicuspid aortic valves
by: Hakan Süygün, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)

Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk. Review of major studies
by: B. S. Tsaroev, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)

Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration After TAVR and SAVR: Incidence, Diagnosis, Predictors, and Management
by: Nadera N. Bismee, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)

Thrombocytopenia after Aortic Valve Replacement Using Sutureless Valves
by: Mil Hoo Kim, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01)

Aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortic valve dysfunction does not impair survival rates
by: Onur B. Dolmaci, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)

Update on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
by: Morgan H. Randall, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Aortic valve cusp repair does not affect durability of modified aortic valve reimplantation for tricuspid aortic valvesCentral MessagePerspective
by: Kevin Hodges, MD, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Comparative analysis of hemodynamic characteristics of the biological xenogenic pericardial prosthesis MEDINGE-BIO with “easy change” system and the xenogenic aortic prosthesis Hancock II after aortic valve replacement
by: K. A. Petlin, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)