Is Immunotherapy Beneficial in Patients with Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers? A Narrative Review

Over the past 20 years, there has been a paradigm shift in the care of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who now have a range of systemic treatment options including targeted therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy (ICI), and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). A proportion of these cancer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David John McMahon, Ronan McLaughlin, Jarushka Naidoo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/3/527
_version_ 1797318992781639680
author David John McMahon
Ronan McLaughlin
Jarushka Naidoo
author_facet David John McMahon
Ronan McLaughlin
Jarushka Naidoo
author_sort David John McMahon
collection DOAJ
description Over the past 20 years, there has been a paradigm shift in the care of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who now have a range of systemic treatment options including targeted therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy (ICI), and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). A proportion of these cancers have single identifiable alterations in oncogenes that drive their proliferation and cancer progression, known as “oncogene-addiction”. These “driver alterations” are identified in approximately two thirds of patients with lung adenocarcinomas, via next generation sequencing or other orthogonal tests. It was noted in the early clinical development of ICIs that patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC may have differential responses to ICI. The toxicity signal for patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC when treated with ICIs also seemed to differ depending on the alteration present and the specific targeted agent used. Developing a greater understanding of the underlying reasons for these clinical observations has become an important area of research in NSCLC. In this review, we analyze the efficacy and safety of ICI according to specific mutations, and consider possible future directions to mitigate safety concerns and improve the outcomes for patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T03:59:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3faad7767b574f93af5d8ed565bffbd3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T03:59:26Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-3faad7767b574f93af5d8ed565bffbd32024-02-09T15:08:53ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942024-01-0116352710.3390/cancers16030527Is Immunotherapy Beneficial in Patients with Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers? A Narrative ReviewDavid John McMahon0Ronan McLaughlin1Jarushka Naidoo2Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, St. James’s Hospital, James’s Street, D08 NHY1 Dublin, IrelandSt. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, IrelandDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21287, USAOver the past 20 years, there has been a paradigm shift in the care of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who now have a range of systemic treatment options including targeted therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy (ICI), and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). A proportion of these cancers have single identifiable alterations in oncogenes that drive their proliferation and cancer progression, known as “oncogene-addiction”. These “driver alterations” are identified in approximately two thirds of patients with lung adenocarcinomas, via next generation sequencing or other orthogonal tests. It was noted in the early clinical development of ICIs that patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC may have differential responses to ICI. The toxicity signal for patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC when treated with ICIs also seemed to differ depending on the alteration present and the specific targeted agent used. Developing a greater understanding of the underlying reasons for these clinical observations has become an important area of research in NSCLC. In this review, we analyze the efficacy and safety of ICI according to specific mutations, and consider possible future directions to mitigate safety concerns and improve the outcomes for patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/3/527immunotherapyoncogene-addictedoncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancerEGFRALKKRAS
spellingShingle David John McMahon
Ronan McLaughlin
Jarushka Naidoo
Is Immunotherapy Beneficial in Patients with Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers? A Narrative Review
Cancers
immunotherapy
oncogene-addicted
oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer
EGFR
ALK
KRAS
title Is Immunotherapy Beneficial in Patients with Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers? A Narrative Review
title_full Is Immunotherapy Beneficial in Patients with Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers? A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Is Immunotherapy Beneficial in Patients with Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers? A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Is Immunotherapy Beneficial in Patients with Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers? A Narrative Review
title_short Is Immunotherapy Beneficial in Patients with Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers? A Narrative Review
title_sort is immunotherapy beneficial in patients with oncogene addicted non small cell lung cancers a narrative review
topic immunotherapy
oncogene-addicted
oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer
EGFR
ALK
KRAS
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/3/527
work_keys_str_mv AT davidjohnmcmahon isimmunotherapybeneficialinpatientswithoncogeneaddictednonsmallcelllungcancersanarrativereview
AT ronanmclaughlin isimmunotherapybeneficialinpatientswithoncogeneaddictednonsmallcelllungcancersanarrativereview
AT jarushkanaidoo isimmunotherapybeneficialinpatientswithoncogeneaddictednonsmallcelllungcancersanarrativereview