The Taxonomy of Writing Systems: How to Measure How Logographic a System Is
Taxonomies of writing systems since Gelb (1952) have classified systems based on what the written symbols represent: if they represent words or morphemes, they are logographic; if syllables, syllabic; if segments, alphabetic; and so forth. Sproat (2000) and Rogers (2005) broke with t...
Main Authors: | Richard Sproat, Alexander Gutkin |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The MIT Press
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Computational Linguistics |
Online Access: | https://direct.mit.edu/coli/article/47/3/477/102776/The-Taxonomy-of-Writing-Systems-How-to-Measure-How |
Similar Items
-
The Logographic Analysis of Social Processual Texts
by: Annette Schmitt, et al.
Published: (2001-02-01) -
Logographic Kanji versus phonographic Kana in literacy acquisition: how important are visual and phonological skills?
by: Koyama, MS, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Normative data for logographic and lexical Japanese paired associates
by: Wesley Pyke, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Functional MRI evidence for the importance of visual short-term memory in logographic reading.
by: Koyama, MS, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Unimodal and multimodal regions for logographic language processing in left ventral occipitotemporal cortex
by: Yuan eDeng, et al.
Published: (2013-09-01)