Evaluating the impacts of reduced sampling density in a systematic fisheries-independent survey design
Fisheries-independent surveys provide critical data products used to estimate stock status and inform management decisions. While it can be possible to redistribute sampling effort to improve survey efficiency and address changing monitoring needs in the face of unforeseen challenges, it is importan...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Marine Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1219283/full |
| _version_ | 1797737007803269120 |
|---|---|
| author | Lukas DeFilippo Stan Kotwicki Lewis Barnett Jon Richar Michael A. Litzow William T. Stockhausen Katie Palof |
| author_facet | Lukas DeFilippo Stan Kotwicki Lewis Barnett Jon Richar Michael A. Litzow William T. Stockhausen Katie Palof |
| author_sort | Lukas DeFilippo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Fisheries-independent surveys provide critical data products used to estimate stock status and inform management decisions. While it can be possible to redistribute sampling effort to improve survey efficiency and address changing monitoring needs in the face of unforeseen challenges, it is important to assess the consequences of such changes. Here, we present an approach that relies on existing survey data and simulations to evaluate the impacts of strategic reductions in survey sampling effort. We apply this approach to assess the potential effects of reducing high density sampling near St. Matthew Island and the Pribilof Islands in the NOAA eastern Bering Sea (EBS) bottom trawl survey. These areas contain high density “corner stations” that were implemented for finer-scale monitoring of associated blue king crab stocks (Paralithodes platypus) which historically supported commercial fisheries but have since declined and are seldom eligible for harvest. We investigate the effects of removing these corner stations on survey data quality for focal P. platypus stocks and other crab and groundfish species monitored by the EBS survey. We find that removing the St. Matthew and Pribilof Islands corner stations has negligible effects on data quality for most stocks, except for those whose distributions are concentrated in these areas. However, the data quality for such stocks was relatively low even with higher density sampling, and corner station removal had only minor effects on stock assessment outcomes. The analysis we present here provides a generic approach for evaluating strategic reductions in sampling effort for systematic survey designs and can be applied by scientists and managers facing similar decisions elsewhere. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:22:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3fb52aa2badf4900bac8a512385997a2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2296-7745 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:22:10Z |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Marine Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-3fb52aa2badf4900bac8a512385997a22023-08-25T17:21:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452023-08-011010.3389/fmars.2023.12192831219283Evaluating the impacts of reduced sampling density in a systematic fisheries-independent survey designLukas DeFilippo0Stan Kotwicki1Lewis Barnett2Jon Richar3Michael A. Litzow4William T. Stockhausen5Katie Palof6Resource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Seattle, WA, United StatesResource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Seattle, WA, United StatesResource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Seattle, WA, United StatesResource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Kodiak, AK, United StatesResource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Kodiak, AK, United StatesResource Ecology and Fisheries Management Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Seattle, WA, United StatesAlaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, Juneau, AK, United StatesFisheries-independent surveys provide critical data products used to estimate stock status and inform management decisions. While it can be possible to redistribute sampling effort to improve survey efficiency and address changing monitoring needs in the face of unforeseen challenges, it is important to assess the consequences of such changes. Here, we present an approach that relies on existing survey data and simulations to evaluate the impacts of strategic reductions in survey sampling effort. We apply this approach to assess the potential effects of reducing high density sampling near St. Matthew Island and the Pribilof Islands in the NOAA eastern Bering Sea (EBS) bottom trawl survey. These areas contain high density “corner stations” that were implemented for finer-scale monitoring of associated blue king crab stocks (Paralithodes platypus) which historically supported commercial fisheries but have since declined and are seldom eligible for harvest. We investigate the effects of removing these corner stations on survey data quality for focal P. platypus stocks and other crab and groundfish species monitored by the EBS survey. We find that removing the St. Matthew and Pribilof Islands corner stations has negligible effects on data quality for most stocks, except for those whose distributions are concentrated in these areas. However, the data quality for such stocks was relatively low even with higher density sampling, and corner station removal had only minor effects on stock assessment outcomes. The analysis we present here provides a generic approach for evaluating strategic reductions in sampling effort for systematic survey designs and can be applied by scientists and managers facing similar decisions elsewhere.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1219283/fullsurvey designstock assessmentgroundfishcrabspatiotemporal model |
| spellingShingle | Lukas DeFilippo Stan Kotwicki Lewis Barnett Jon Richar Michael A. Litzow William T. Stockhausen Katie Palof Evaluating the impacts of reduced sampling density in a systematic fisheries-independent survey design Frontiers in Marine Science survey design stock assessment groundfish crab spatiotemporal model |
| title | Evaluating the impacts of reduced sampling density in a systematic fisheries-independent survey design |
| title_full | Evaluating the impacts of reduced sampling density in a systematic fisheries-independent survey design |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating the impacts of reduced sampling density in a systematic fisheries-independent survey design |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the impacts of reduced sampling density in a systematic fisheries-independent survey design |
| title_short | Evaluating the impacts of reduced sampling density in a systematic fisheries-independent survey design |
| title_sort | evaluating the impacts of reduced sampling density in a systematic fisheries independent survey design |
| topic | survey design stock assessment groundfish crab spatiotemporal model |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1219283/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lukasdefilippo evaluatingtheimpactsofreducedsamplingdensityinasystematicfisheriesindependentsurveydesign AT stankotwicki evaluatingtheimpactsofreducedsamplingdensityinasystematicfisheriesindependentsurveydesign AT lewisbarnett evaluatingtheimpactsofreducedsamplingdensityinasystematicfisheriesindependentsurveydesign AT jonrichar evaluatingtheimpactsofreducedsamplingdensityinasystematicfisheriesindependentsurveydesign AT michaelalitzow evaluatingtheimpactsofreducedsamplingdensityinasystematicfisheriesindependentsurveydesign AT williamtstockhausen evaluatingtheimpactsofreducedsamplingdensityinasystematicfisheriesindependentsurveydesign AT katiepalof evaluatingtheimpactsofreducedsamplingdensityinasystematicfisheriesindependentsurveydesign |