Comparison of the effect of QMix and conventional root canal irrigants on push‐out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the effect of application of QMix and common root canal irrigating solutions on the bond strength of fiber post to root dentin. Material and Methods In this in‐vitro study, 60 extracted incisor teeth were decoronated such that 15 mm of root length remai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farzaneh Afkhami, Mona Sadegh, Aidin Sooratgar, Maryam Amirmoezi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-02-01
Series:Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.500
_version_ 1818331079467073536
author Farzaneh Afkhami
Mona Sadegh
Aidin Sooratgar
Maryam Amirmoezi
author_facet Farzaneh Afkhami
Mona Sadegh
Aidin Sooratgar
Maryam Amirmoezi
author_sort Farzaneh Afkhami
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the effect of application of QMix and common root canal irrigating solutions on the bond strength of fiber post to root dentin. Material and Methods In this in‐vitro study, 60 extracted incisor teeth were decoronated such that 15 mm of root length remained. The canals were prepared with ProTaper rotary system to F5 and filled with gutta‐percha and AH26 sealer. Prior to post placement, the teeth were divided into four groups based on the type of final irrigating solution namely saline, 5.25% NaOCl, 2% chlorhexidine, and QMix. The fiber posts were then cemented with Panavia F2 resin cement. The roots were sectioned perpendicular to their longitudinal axis, and four sections with 1 mm thickness were made at the middle and coronal thirds of the roots. The push‐out bond strength of fiber posts was measured by a universal testing machine in megapascals. Data were analyzed by two‐way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results The maximum and minimum bond strength values were noted in QMix and NaOCl groups in both the middle and coronal third of the root, respectively. But, there was no significant difference between the push‐out bond strength in the middle or coronal third of the root (p = 0.054). Adhesive failure was the most common mode of failure in all groups. Conclusion Use of QMix for post space irrigation does not compromise the bond strength of fiber post to root dentin, and can be used for final rinsing of the post space.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T13:14:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3fc08194f92b481b806dac29f87ec204
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2057-4347
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T13:14:09Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
spelling doaj.art-3fc08194f92b481b806dac29f87ec2042022-12-21T23:44:35ZengWileyClinical and Experimental Dental Research2057-43472022-02-018146446910.1002/cre2.500Comparison of the effect of QMix and conventional root canal irrigants on push‐out bond strength of fiber post to root dentinFarzaneh Afkhami0Mona Sadegh1Aidin Sooratgar2Maryam Amirmoezi3Department of Endodontics School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, International Campus Tehran IranEndodontist, Private Practice Vancouver British Columbia CanadaDepartment of Endodontics School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, International Campus Tehran IranGeneral Dentist, Private Practice Tehran IranAbstract Objectives This study aimed to assess the effect of application of QMix and common root canal irrigating solutions on the bond strength of fiber post to root dentin. Material and Methods In this in‐vitro study, 60 extracted incisor teeth were decoronated such that 15 mm of root length remained. The canals were prepared with ProTaper rotary system to F5 and filled with gutta‐percha and AH26 sealer. Prior to post placement, the teeth were divided into four groups based on the type of final irrigating solution namely saline, 5.25% NaOCl, 2% chlorhexidine, and QMix. The fiber posts were then cemented with Panavia F2 resin cement. The roots were sectioned perpendicular to their longitudinal axis, and four sections with 1 mm thickness were made at the middle and coronal thirds of the roots. The push‐out bond strength of fiber posts was measured by a universal testing machine in megapascals. Data were analyzed by two‐way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results The maximum and minimum bond strength values were noted in QMix and NaOCl groups in both the middle and coronal third of the root, respectively. But, there was no significant difference between the push‐out bond strength in the middle or coronal third of the root (p = 0.054). Adhesive failure was the most common mode of failure in all groups. Conclusion Use of QMix for post space irrigation does not compromise the bond strength of fiber post to root dentin, and can be used for final rinsing of the post space.https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.500fiber postfinal rinsepush‐out bond strengthQMix
spellingShingle Farzaneh Afkhami
Mona Sadegh
Aidin Sooratgar
Maryam Amirmoezi
Comparison of the effect of QMix and conventional root canal irrigants on push‐out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
fiber post
final rinse
push‐out bond strength
QMix
title Comparison of the effect of QMix and conventional root canal irrigants on push‐out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin
title_full Comparison of the effect of QMix and conventional root canal irrigants on push‐out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin
title_fullStr Comparison of the effect of QMix and conventional root canal irrigants on push‐out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effect of QMix and conventional root canal irrigants on push‐out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin
title_short Comparison of the effect of QMix and conventional root canal irrigants on push‐out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin
title_sort comparison of the effect of qmix and conventional root canal irrigants on push out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin
topic fiber post
final rinse
push‐out bond strength
QMix
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.500
work_keys_str_mv AT farzanehafkhami comparisonoftheeffectofqmixandconventionalrootcanalirrigantsonpushoutbondstrengthoffiberposttorootdentin
AT monasadegh comparisonoftheeffectofqmixandconventionalrootcanalirrigantsonpushoutbondstrengthoffiberposttorootdentin
AT aidinsooratgar comparisonoftheeffectofqmixandconventionalrootcanalirrigantsonpushoutbondstrengthoffiberposttorootdentin
AT maryamamirmoezi comparisonoftheeffectofqmixandconventionalrootcanalirrigantsonpushoutbondstrengthoffiberposttorootdentin