The Treachery of Images: Why Images Do not Exist and There Are Only Flat Objects

Do images exist? In this paper I argue that the notion of an image is ontologically empty – i.e., images are no more than a cultural invention akin to epicycles in astronomy. There are only flat objects engaged in various causal roles. In this paper I will defend the thesis that in visual culture...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Manzotti, Riccardo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari 2021-06-01
Series:JoLMA
Subjects:
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2021/01/006
_version_ 1797464613363646464
author Manzotti, Riccardo
author_facet Manzotti, Riccardo
author_sort Manzotti, Riccardo
collection DOAJ
description Do images exist? In this paper I argue that the notion of an image is ontologically empty – i.e., images are no more than a cultural invention akin to epicycles in astronomy. There are only flat objects engaged in various causal roles. In this paper I will defend the thesis that in visual culture, in the neurosciences, and in philosophy of mind, there is no convincing evidence in favor of their existence. Moreover, I will outline a series of arguments aiming at showing that images do not exist. I will discuss briefly discuss why many authors – from the iconic turn to the neurosciences – use the notion of image as though it were something real. I will conclude suggesting to drop the subject-object divide and to consider a completely flat ontology made only of (relative) objects.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T18:09:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3fcbc367e3b4468fa5bf974d3a041407
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2723-9640
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T18:09:45Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
record_format Article
series JoLMA
spelling doaj.art-3fcbc367e3b4468fa5bf974d3a0414072023-11-24T09:11:21ZengFondazione Università Ca’ FoscariJoLMA2723-96402021-06-012110.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2021/01/006journal_article_5213The Treachery of Images: Why Images Do not Exist and There Are Only Flat ObjectsManzotti, Riccardo0Università IULM, Italia Do images exist? In this paper I argue that the notion of an image is ontologically empty – i.e., images are no more than a cultural invention akin to epicycles in astronomy. There are only flat objects engaged in various causal roles. In this paper I will defend the thesis that in visual culture, in the neurosciences, and in philosophy of mind, there is no convincing evidence in favor of their existence. Moreover, I will outline a series of arguments aiming at showing that images do not exist. I will discuss briefly discuss why many authors – from the iconic turn to the neurosciences – use the notion of image as though it were something real. I will conclude suggesting to drop the subject-object divide and to consider a completely flat ontology made only of (relative) objects. http://doi.org/10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2021/01/006Body. Images. Mind-Object Identity. Philosophy of Mind. Pictures
spellingShingle Manzotti, Riccardo
The Treachery of Images: Why Images Do not Exist and There Are Only Flat Objects
JoLMA
Body. Images. Mind-Object Identity. Philosophy of Mind. Pictures
title The Treachery of Images: Why Images Do not Exist and There Are Only Flat Objects
title_full The Treachery of Images: Why Images Do not Exist and There Are Only Flat Objects
title_fullStr The Treachery of Images: Why Images Do not Exist and There Are Only Flat Objects
title_full_unstemmed The Treachery of Images: Why Images Do not Exist and There Are Only Flat Objects
title_short The Treachery of Images: Why Images Do not Exist and There Are Only Flat Objects
title_sort treachery of images why images do not exist and there are only flat objects
topic Body. Images. Mind-Object Identity. Philosophy of Mind. Pictures
url http://doi.org/10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2021/01/006
work_keys_str_mv AT manzottiriccardo thetreacheryofimageswhyimagesdonotexistandthereareonlyflatobjects
AT manzottiriccardo treacheryofimageswhyimagesdonotexistandthereareonlyflatobjects