Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate

This review describes the role of modern preprosthetic surgery. The atrophic edentulous jaw can cause severe functional impairment for patients, leading to inadequate denture retention, reduced quality of life, and significant health problems. The aim of preprosthetic surgery is to restore function...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hendrik Terheyden, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Mats Sjöström, Thomas Starch-Jensen, John Cawood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/23/7262
_version_ 1797399963463843840
author Hendrik Terheyden
Gerry M. Raghoebar
Mats Sjöström
Thomas Starch-Jensen
John Cawood
author_facet Hendrik Terheyden
Gerry M. Raghoebar
Mats Sjöström
Thomas Starch-Jensen
John Cawood
author_sort Hendrik Terheyden
collection DOAJ
description This review describes the role of modern preprosthetic surgery. The atrophic edentulous jaw can cause severe functional impairment for patients, leading to inadequate denture retention, reduced quality of life, and significant health problems. The aim of preprosthetic surgery is to restore function and form due to tooth loss arising from congenital deformity, trauma, or ablative surgery. Alveolar bone loss is due to disuse atrophy following tooth loss. The advent of dental implants and their ability to preserve bone heralded the modern version of preprosthetic surgery. Their ability to mimic natural teeth has overcome the age-old problem of edentulism and consequent jaw atrophy. Controversies with preprosthetic surgery are discussed: soft tissue versus hard tissue augmentation in the aesthetic zone, bone regeneration versus prosthetic tissue replacement in the anterior maxilla, sinus floor augmentation versus short implants in the posterior maxilla—interpositional bone grafting versus onlay grafts for vertical bone augmentation. Best results for rehabilitation are achieved by the team approach of surgeons, maxillofacial prosthodontists/general dentists, and importantly, informing patients about the available preprosthetic surgical options.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:48:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3fdde2d3e0d047198aff57562ef3c8ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:48:44Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-3fdde2d3e0d047198aff57562ef3c8ed2023-12-08T15:18:59ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-11-011223726210.3390/jcm12237262Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current DebateHendrik Terheyden0Gerry M. Raghoebar1Mats Sjöström2Thomas Starch-Jensen3John Cawood4Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Helios Hospitals, 34121 Kassel, GermanyDeptartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsOral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, SwedenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000 Aalborg, DenmarkEmeritus Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Mersey Regional Health Authority, UKThis review describes the role of modern preprosthetic surgery. The atrophic edentulous jaw can cause severe functional impairment for patients, leading to inadequate denture retention, reduced quality of life, and significant health problems. The aim of preprosthetic surgery is to restore function and form due to tooth loss arising from congenital deformity, trauma, or ablative surgery. Alveolar bone loss is due to disuse atrophy following tooth loss. The advent of dental implants and their ability to preserve bone heralded the modern version of preprosthetic surgery. Their ability to mimic natural teeth has overcome the age-old problem of edentulism and consequent jaw atrophy. Controversies with preprosthetic surgery are discussed: soft tissue versus hard tissue augmentation in the aesthetic zone, bone regeneration versus prosthetic tissue replacement in the anterior maxilla, sinus floor augmentation versus short implants in the posterior maxilla—interpositional bone grafting versus onlay grafts for vertical bone augmentation. Best results for rehabilitation are achieved by the team approach of surgeons, maxillofacial prosthodontists/general dentists, and importantly, informing patients about the available preprosthetic surgical options.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/23/7262alveolar bone atrophyalveolar bone lossbone graftingdental implantsedentulous jawpreprosthetic oral surgery procedures
spellingShingle Hendrik Terheyden
Gerry M. Raghoebar
Mats Sjöström
Thomas Starch-Jensen
John Cawood
Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate
Journal of Clinical Medicine
alveolar bone atrophy
alveolar bone loss
bone grafting
dental implants
edentulous jaw
preprosthetic oral surgery procedures
title Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate
title_full Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate
title_fullStr Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate
title_full_unstemmed Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate
title_short Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate
title_sort preprosthetic surgery narrative review and current debate
topic alveolar bone atrophy
alveolar bone loss
bone grafting
dental implants
edentulous jaw
preprosthetic oral surgery procedures
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/23/7262
work_keys_str_mv AT hendrikterheyden preprostheticsurgerynarrativereviewandcurrentdebate
AT gerrymraghoebar preprostheticsurgerynarrativereviewandcurrentdebate
AT matssjostrom preprostheticsurgerynarrativereviewandcurrentdebate
AT thomasstarchjensen preprostheticsurgerynarrativereviewandcurrentdebate
AT johncawood preprostheticsurgerynarrativereviewandcurrentdebate