Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate
This review describes the role of modern preprosthetic surgery. The atrophic edentulous jaw can cause severe functional impairment for patients, leading to inadequate denture retention, reduced quality of life, and significant health problems. The aim of preprosthetic surgery is to restore function...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/23/7262 |
_version_ | 1797399963463843840 |
---|---|
author | Hendrik Terheyden Gerry M. Raghoebar Mats Sjöström Thomas Starch-Jensen John Cawood |
author_facet | Hendrik Terheyden Gerry M. Raghoebar Mats Sjöström Thomas Starch-Jensen John Cawood |
author_sort | Hendrik Terheyden |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This review describes the role of modern preprosthetic surgery. The atrophic edentulous jaw can cause severe functional impairment for patients, leading to inadequate denture retention, reduced quality of life, and significant health problems. The aim of preprosthetic surgery is to restore function and form due to tooth loss arising from congenital deformity, trauma, or ablative surgery. Alveolar bone loss is due to disuse atrophy following tooth loss. The advent of dental implants and their ability to preserve bone heralded the modern version of preprosthetic surgery. Their ability to mimic natural teeth has overcome the age-old problem of edentulism and consequent jaw atrophy. Controversies with preprosthetic surgery are discussed: soft tissue versus hard tissue augmentation in the aesthetic zone, bone regeneration versus prosthetic tissue replacement in the anterior maxilla, sinus floor augmentation versus short implants in the posterior maxilla—interpositional bone grafting versus onlay grafts for vertical bone augmentation. Best results for rehabilitation are achieved by the team approach of surgeons, maxillofacial prosthodontists/general dentists, and importantly, informing patients about the available preprosthetic surgical options. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T01:48:44Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3fdde2d3e0d047198aff57562ef3c8ed |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2077-0383 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T01:48:44Z |
publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-3fdde2d3e0d047198aff57562ef3c8ed2023-12-08T15:18:59ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-11-011223726210.3390/jcm12237262Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current DebateHendrik Terheyden0Gerry M. Raghoebar1Mats Sjöström2Thomas Starch-Jensen3John Cawood4Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Helios Hospitals, 34121 Kassel, GermanyDeptartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsOral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, SwedenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000 Aalborg, DenmarkEmeritus Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Mersey Regional Health Authority, UKThis review describes the role of modern preprosthetic surgery. The atrophic edentulous jaw can cause severe functional impairment for patients, leading to inadequate denture retention, reduced quality of life, and significant health problems. The aim of preprosthetic surgery is to restore function and form due to tooth loss arising from congenital deformity, trauma, or ablative surgery. Alveolar bone loss is due to disuse atrophy following tooth loss. The advent of dental implants and their ability to preserve bone heralded the modern version of preprosthetic surgery. Their ability to mimic natural teeth has overcome the age-old problem of edentulism and consequent jaw atrophy. Controversies with preprosthetic surgery are discussed: soft tissue versus hard tissue augmentation in the aesthetic zone, bone regeneration versus prosthetic tissue replacement in the anterior maxilla, sinus floor augmentation versus short implants in the posterior maxilla—interpositional bone grafting versus onlay grafts for vertical bone augmentation. Best results for rehabilitation are achieved by the team approach of surgeons, maxillofacial prosthodontists/general dentists, and importantly, informing patients about the available preprosthetic surgical options.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/23/7262alveolar bone atrophyalveolar bone lossbone graftingdental implantsedentulous jawpreprosthetic oral surgery procedures |
spellingShingle | Hendrik Terheyden Gerry M. Raghoebar Mats Sjöström Thomas Starch-Jensen John Cawood Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate Journal of Clinical Medicine alveolar bone atrophy alveolar bone loss bone grafting dental implants edentulous jaw preprosthetic oral surgery procedures |
title | Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate |
title_full | Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate |
title_fullStr | Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate |
title_full_unstemmed | Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate |
title_short | Preprosthetic Surgery—Narrative Review and Current Debate |
title_sort | preprosthetic surgery narrative review and current debate |
topic | alveolar bone atrophy alveolar bone loss bone grafting dental implants edentulous jaw preprosthetic oral surgery procedures |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/23/7262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendrikterheyden preprostheticsurgerynarrativereviewandcurrentdebate AT gerrymraghoebar preprostheticsurgerynarrativereviewandcurrentdebate AT matssjostrom preprostheticsurgerynarrativereviewandcurrentdebate AT thomasstarchjensen preprostheticsurgerynarrativereviewandcurrentdebate AT johncawood preprostheticsurgerynarrativereviewandcurrentdebate |