Intact Tails as a Welfare Indicator in Finishing Pigs? Scoring of Tail Lesions and Defining Intact Tails in Undocked Pigs at the Abattoir

Tail biting lesions are a potential measure of on-farm animal welfare, as a large range of stressors increase the risk for tail biting outbreaks. Further, tail biting is a major challenge, as lesions due to tail biting decrease animal welfare and health, as well as production efficiency and carcass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Valros, Elina Välimäki, Heli Nordgren, Johannes Vugts, Emma Fàbrega, Mari Heinonen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00405/full
_version_ 1818504701461659648
author Anna Valros
Elina Välimäki
Heli Nordgren
Johannes Vugts
Emma Fàbrega
Mari Heinonen
author_facet Anna Valros
Elina Välimäki
Heli Nordgren
Johannes Vugts
Emma Fàbrega
Mari Heinonen
author_sort Anna Valros
collection DOAJ
description Tail biting lesions are a potential measure of on-farm animal welfare, as a large range of stressors increase the risk for tail biting outbreaks. Further, tail biting is a major challenge, as lesions due to tail biting decrease animal welfare and health, as well as production efficiency and carcass quality. The aim of this study was to suggest a tail scoring system for use at slaughterhouses processing undocked pigs, and to link tail lesion scores to meat inspection data. A further aim was to suggest a definition for an intact enough tail. To validate the suggested scoring system we assessed tails before and after scalding and compared results to pathological examinations. In total, 14,433 tails were scored, and 117 tails were collected for pathological examination. After scalding, 49.2% of all tails were scored as fully intact. Of tails with lesions 2.5% were scored as having major acute wounds (>2 cm), while 11.6% had minor acute wounds (<2 cm), and 36.7% healed lesions. Intact tails were on average 31.5 cm (SD 2.5 cm) long. Lesion scored at the slaughter-line agreed well with the pathological assessment. Tail lesions were associated with several meat inspection findings: tails with more severe lesions and of shorter length increased the risk for meat inspection findings to a higher degree. A detailed lesion scoring method helps to identify carcasses at risk for condemnations, as well as being a potential method for on-farm welfare estimation. We suggest that a system for scoring tail lesions in undocked pigs should utilize a combination of scoring of the lesion and measuring the tail length. As bite marks or bruises on an otherwise intact tail were not a concern for meat hygiene, we suggest the definition of an intact enough tail could allow the inclusion of tails with these mild changes. Meat inspection findings in carcasses with tails scored as healed, but with no fresh lesions, and with more than 75% of the average intact length remaining were rather similar to those of fully intact tails. Based on these findings we suggest that a tail of this length, and with no visible fresh lesions could also be considered intact enough.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:40:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3feb7c9555fb4606bf84caab44a7770b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-1769
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:40:40Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj.art-3feb7c9555fb4606bf84caab44a7770b2022-12-22T01:32:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692020-07-01710.3389/fvets.2020.00405555025Intact Tails as a Welfare Indicator in Finishing Pigs? Scoring of Tail Lesions and Defining Intact Tails in Undocked Pigs at the AbattoirAnna Valros0Elina Välimäki1Heli Nordgren2Johannes Vugts3Emma Fàbrega4Mari Heinonen5Department of Production Animal Medicine and Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandAnimal Sourcing, HKScan Finland Oyj, Forssa, FinlandDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandAnimal Sourcing, HKScan Finland Oyj, Forssa, FinlandAnimal Welfare Program, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentària (IRTA), Monells, SpainDepartment of Production Animal Medicine and Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandTail biting lesions are a potential measure of on-farm animal welfare, as a large range of stressors increase the risk for tail biting outbreaks. Further, tail biting is a major challenge, as lesions due to tail biting decrease animal welfare and health, as well as production efficiency and carcass quality. The aim of this study was to suggest a tail scoring system for use at slaughterhouses processing undocked pigs, and to link tail lesion scores to meat inspection data. A further aim was to suggest a definition for an intact enough tail. To validate the suggested scoring system we assessed tails before and after scalding and compared results to pathological examinations. In total, 14,433 tails were scored, and 117 tails were collected for pathological examination. After scalding, 49.2% of all tails were scored as fully intact. Of tails with lesions 2.5% were scored as having major acute wounds (>2 cm), while 11.6% had minor acute wounds (<2 cm), and 36.7% healed lesions. Intact tails were on average 31.5 cm (SD 2.5 cm) long. Lesion scored at the slaughter-line agreed well with the pathological assessment. Tail lesions were associated with several meat inspection findings: tails with more severe lesions and of shorter length increased the risk for meat inspection findings to a higher degree. A detailed lesion scoring method helps to identify carcasses at risk for condemnations, as well as being a potential method for on-farm welfare estimation. We suggest that a system for scoring tail lesions in undocked pigs should utilize a combination of scoring of the lesion and measuring the tail length. As bite marks or bruises on an otherwise intact tail were not a concern for meat hygiene, we suggest the definition of an intact enough tail could allow the inclusion of tails with these mild changes. Meat inspection findings in carcasses with tails scored as healed, but with no fresh lesions, and with more than 75% of the average intact length remaining were rather similar to those of fully intact tails. Based on these findings we suggest that a tail of this length, and with no visible fresh lesions could also be considered intact enough.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00405/fulltail bitingtail lesionspigmeat inspectionabattoirpig welfare
spellingShingle Anna Valros
Elina Välimäki
Heli Nordgren
Johannes Vugts
Emma Fàbrega
Mari Heinonen
Intact Tails as a Welfare Indicator in Finishing Pigs? Scoring of Tail Lesions and Defining Intact Tails in Undocked Pigs at the Abattoir
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
tail biting
tail lesions
pig
meat inspection
abattoir
pig welfare
title Intact Tails as a Welfare Indicator in Finishing Pigs? Scoring of Tail Lesions and Defining Intact Tails in Undocked Pigs at the Abattoir
title_full Intact Tails as a Welfare Indicator in Finishing Pigs? Scoring of Tail Lesions and Defining Intact Tails in Undocked Pigs at the Abattoir
title_fullStr Intact Tails as a Welfare Indicator in Finishing Pigs? Scoring of Tail Lesions and Defining Intact Tails in Undocked Pigs at the Abattoir
title_full_unstemmed Intact Tails as a Welfare Indicator in Finishing Pigs? Scoring of Tail Lesions and Defining Intact Tails in Undocked Pigs at the Abattoir
title_short Intact Tails as a Welfare Indicator in Finishing Pigs? Scoring of Tail Lesions and Defining Intact Tails in Undocked Pigs at the Abattoir
title_sort intact tails as a welfare indicator in finishing pigs scoring of tail lesions and defining intact tails in undocked pigs at the abattoir
topic tail biting
tail lesions
pig
meat inspection
abattoir
pig welfare
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00405/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annavalros intacttailsasawelfareindicatorinfinishingpigsscoringoftaillesionsanddefiningintacttailsinundockedpigsattheabattoir
AT elinavalimaki intacttailsasawelfareindicatorinfinishingpigsscoringoftaillesionsanddefiningintacttailsinundockedpigsattheabattoir
AT helinordgren intacttailsasawelfareindicatorinfinishingpigsscoringoftaillesionsanddefiningintacttailsinundockedpigsattheabattoir
AT johannesvugts intacttailsasawelfareindicatorinfinishingpigsscoringoftaillesionsanddefiningintacttailsinundockedpigsattheabattoir
AT emmafabrega intacttailsasawelfareindicatorinfinishingpigsscoringoftaillesionsanddefiningintacttailsinundockedpigsattheabattoir
AT mariheinonen intacttailsasawelfareindicatorinfinishingpigsscoringoftaillesionsanddefiningintacttailsinundockedpigsattheabattoir