Differences between Dorsal and Ventral Striatum in the Sensitivity of Tonically Active Neurons to Rewarding Events

Within the striatum, cholinergic interneurons, electrophysiologically identified as tonically active neurons (TANs), represent a relatively homogeneous group in terms of their functional properties. They display typical pause in tonic firing in response to rewarding events which are of crucial impor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Marche, Anne-Caroline Martel, Paul Apicella
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00052/full
_version_ 1831693210109345792
author Kevin Marche
Anne-Caroline Martel
Paul Apicella
author_facet Kevin Marche
Anne-Caroline Martel
Paul Apicella
author_sort Kevin Marche
collection DOAJ
description Within the striatum, cholinergic interneurons, electrophysiologically identified as tonically active neurons (TANs), represent a relatively homogeneous group in terms of their functional properties. They display typical pause in tonic firing in response to rewarding events which are of crucial importance for reinforcement learning. These responses are uniformly distributed throughout the dorsal striatum (i.e., motor and associative striatum), but it is unknown, at least in monkeys, whether differences in the modulation of TAN activity exist in the ventral striatum (i.e., limbic striatum), a region specialized for processing of motivational information. To address this issue, we examined the activity of dorsal and ventral TANs in two monkeys trained on a Pavlovian conditioning task in which a visual stimulus preceded the delivery of liquid reward by a fixed time interval. We found that the proportion of TANs responding to the stimulus predictive of reward did not vary significantly across regions (58%–80%), whereas the fraction of TANs responding to reward was higher in the limbic striatum (100%) compared to the motor (65%) and associative striatum (52%). By examining TAN modulation at the level of both the population and the individual neurons, we showed that the duration of pause responses to the stimulus and reward was longer in the ventral than in the dorsal striatal regions. Also, the magnitude of the pause was greater in ventral than dorsal striatum for the stimulus predictive of reward but not for the reward itself. We found similar region-specific differences in pause response duration to the stimulus when the timing of reward was less predictable (fixed replaced by variable time interval). Regional variations in the duration and magnitude of the pause response were transferred from the stimulus to reward when reward was delivered in the absence of any predictive stimulus. It therefore appears that ventral TANs exhibit stronger responses to rewarding stimuli, compared to dorsal TANs. The high proportion of responsive neurons, combined with particular response features, support the notion that the ventral TAN system can be driven by specific synaptic inputs arising from afferent sources distinct from those targeting the dorsal TAN system.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T12:08:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3fed542680ec44f48d1dcb742a24d0a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5137
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T12:08:36Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-3fed542680ec44f48d1dcb742a24d0a42022-12-21T19:41:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience1662-51372017-07-011110.3389/fnsys.2017.00052284517Differences between Dorsal and Ventral Striatum in the Sensitivity of Tonically Active Neurons to Rewarding EventsKevin Marche0Anne-Caroline Martel1Paul Apicella2nstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Aix Marseille UniversitéMarseille, Francenstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Aix Marseille UniversitéMarseille, Francenstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Aix Marseille UniversitéMarseille, FranceWithin the striatum, cholinergic interneurons, electrophysiologically identified as tonically active neurons (TANs), represent a relatively homogeneous group in terms of their functional properties. They display typical pause in tonic firing in response to rewarding events which are of crucial importance for reinforcement learning. These responses are uniformly distributed throughout the dorsal striatum (i.e., motor and associative striatum), but it is unknown, at least in monkeys, whether differences in the modulation of TAN activity exist in the ventral striatum (i.e., limbic striatum), a region specialized for processing of motivational information. To address this issue, we examined the activity of dorsal and ventral TANs in two monkeys trained on a Pavlovian conditioning task in which a visual stimulus preceded the delivery of liquid reward by a fixed time interval. We found that the proportion of TANs responding to the stimulus predictive of reward did not vary significantly across regions (58%–80%), whereas the fraction of TANs responding to reward was higher in the limbic striatum (100%) compared to the motor (65%) and associative striatum (52%). By examining TAN modulation at the level of both the population and the individual neurons, we showed that the duration of pause responses to the stimulus and reward was longer in the ventral than in the dorsal striatal regions. Also, the magnitude of the pause was greater in ventral than dorsal striatum for the stimulus predictive of reward but not for the reward itself. We found similar region-specific differences in pause response duration to the stimulus when the timing of reward was less predictable (fixed replaced by variable time interval). Regional variations in the duration and magnitude of the pause response were transferred from the stimulus to reward when reward was delivered in the absence of any predictive stimulus. It therefore appears that ventral TANs exhibit stronger responses to rewarding stimuli, compared to dorsal TANs. The high proportion of responsive neurons, combined with particular response features, support the notion that the ventral TAN system can be driven by specific synaptic inputs arising from afferent sources distinct from those targeting the dorsal TAN system.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00052/fullbasal gangliamotivationpredictionlearningprimate
spellingShingle Kevin Marche
Anne-Caroline Martel
Paul Apicella
Differences between Dorsal and Ventral Striatum in the Sensitivity of Tonically Active Neurons to Rewarding Events
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
basal ganglia
motivation
prediction
learning
primate
title Differences between Dorsal and Ventral Striatum in the Sensitivity of Tonically Active Neurons to Rewarding Events
title_full Differences between Dorsal and Ventral Striatum in the Sensitivity of Tonically Active Neurons to Rewarding Events
title_fullStr Differences between Dorsal and Ventral Striatum in the Sensitivity of Tonically Active Neurons to Rewarding Events
title_full_unstemmed Differences between Dorsal and Ventral Striatum in the Sensitivity of Tonically Active Neurons to Rewarding Events
title_short Differences between Dorsal and Ventral Striatum in the Sensitivity of Tonically Active Neurons to Rewarding Events
title_sort differences between dorsal and ventral striatum in the sensitivity of tonically active neurons to rewarding events
topic basal ganglia
motivation
prediction
learning
primate
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00052/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinmarche differencesbetweendorsalandventralstriatuminthesensitivityoftonicallyactiveneuronstorewardingevents
AT annecarolinemartel differencesbetweendorsalandventralstriatuminthesensitivityoftonicallyactiveneuronstorewardingevents
AT paulapicella differencesbetweendorsalandventralstriatuminthesensitivityoftonicallyactiveneuronstorewardingevents