The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Introduction: Obstetric anesthesia provides several methods for the analgesia of labor pain. The neuraxial technique is considered the standard of care for parturient women. The epidural block is widely used in vaginal delivery while the spinal block is the preferred method for cesarean section (C-s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed Alshabibi, Azza M Madkhali, Amer A Alkinani, Ali A Alyami, Abdulaleem Alatassi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2021;volume=15;issue=4;spage=383;epage=386;aulast=Alshabibi
_version_ 1818407015148421120
author Mohammed Alshabibi
Azza M Madkhali
Amer A Alkinani
Ali A Alyami
Abdulaleem Alatassi
author_facet Mohammed Alshabibi
Azza M Madkhali
Amer A Alkinani
Ali A Alyami
Abdulaleem Alatassi
author_sort Mohammed Alshabibi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Obstetric anesthesia provides several methods for the analgesia of labor pain. The neuraxial technique is considered the standard of care for parturient women. The epidural block is widely used in vaginal delivery while the spinal block is the preferred method for cesarean section (C-section). We aim to know the practice of obstetric anesthesia in our center. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The data of all delivery cases from 1/7/2019 to 30/9/2019 were reviewed. Results: We identified a total of 2,140 cases during the 3 months, vaginal delivery was the most common with 72.4% (1550) while the C-section cases were 27.6% (590). Regarding the type of analgesia/anesthesia for vaginal deliveries, intramuscular analgesia was the commonest group with 34.8% (540), followed by the group of ladies who did not receive any analgesia/anesthesia with 31.9% (495), thirdly was epidural cases with 31.8% (493), and the fourth type was spinal 0.6% (10). Regarding C-section, the emergency cases were 65.4% (386). The types of anesthesia for all C-sections were as follows spinal 63.5% (375), GA 23.8% (141), and epidural 12% (74). Regarding anesthesia for elective cases, spinal was 85% (174), GA 14% (28), and epidural 1% (2). Regarding anesthesia for emergency cases, spinal was 52% (201), GA 29% (113), and epidural 19% (72). Conclusions: The use of epidural was low, and the spinal use was relatively on par if we compare with leading western countries. More focused studies and multicenter studies are needed in the country.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T09:21:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3ff67d9d7441446391fb596855bbf24b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1658-354X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T09:21:07Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-3ff67d9d7441446391fb596855bbf24b2022-12-21T23:08:18ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia1658-354X2021-01-0115438338610.4103/sja.sja_83_21The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi ArabiaMohammed AlshabibiAzza M MadkhaliAmer A AlkinaniAli A AlyamiAbdulaleem AlatassiIntroduction: Obstetric anesthesia provides several methods for the analgesia of labor pain. The neuraxial technique is considered the standard of care for parturient women. The epidural block is widely used in vaginal delivery while the spinal block is the preferred method for cesarean section (C-section). We aim to know the practice of obstetric anesthesia in our center. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The data of all delivery cases from 1/7/2019 to 30/9/2019 were reviewed. Results: We identified a total of 2,140 cases during the 3 months, vaginal delivery was the most common with 72.4% (1550) while the C-section cases were 27.6% (590). Regarding the type of analgesia/anesthesia for vaginal deliveries, intramuscular analgesia was the commonest group with 34.8% (540), followed by the group of ladies who did not receive any analgesia/anesthesia with 31.9% (495), thirdly was epidural cases with 31.8% (493), and the fourth type was spinal 0.6% (10). Regarding C-section, the emergency cases were 65.4% (386). The types of anesthesia for all C-sections were as follows spinal 63.5% (375), GA 23.8% (141), and epidural 12% (74). Regarding anesthesia for elective cases, spinal was 85% (174), GA 14% (28), and epidural 1% (2). Regarding anesthesia for emergency cases, spinal was 52% (201), GA 29% (113), and epidural 19% (72). Conclusions: The use of epidural was low, and the spinal use was relatively on par if we compare with leading western countries. More focused studies and multicenter studies are needed in the country.http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2021;volume=15;issue=4;spage=383;epage=386;aulast=Alshabibiepidural; obstetric anesthesia; spinal
spellingShingle Mohammed Alshabibi
Azza M Madkhali
Amer A Alkinani
Ali A Alyami
Abdulaleem Alatassi
The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
epidural; obstetric anesthesia; spinal
title The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_full The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_short The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_sort trends of obstetric anesthesia practice in a tertiary care center in the kingdom of saudi arabia
topic epidural; obstetric anesthesia; spinal
url http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2021;volume=15;issue=4;spage=383;epage=386;aulast=Alshabibi
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedalshabibi thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT azzammadkhali thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT ameraalkinani thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT aliaalyami thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT abdulaleemalatassi thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT mohammedalshabibi trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT azzammadkhali trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT ameraalkinani trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT aliaalyami trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT abdulaleemalatassi trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia