Association of urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections with type 2 diabetes individuals: a comparative study

Abstract Background Globally, urogenital and intestinal parasitosis remain significant health challenges. They are associated with rising morbidity, death, and many harmful outcomes. A little is known concerning parasitosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our study planned to investigate the urogenita...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Babiker Saad Almugadam, Mihad Khaleil Ibrahim, Yinhui Liu, Shen-min Chen, Chun-hao Wang, Chen-yi Shao, Bao-wei Ren, Li Tang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05629-9
_version_ 1818967079739457536
author Babiker Saad Almugadam
Mihad Khaleil Ibrahim
Yinhui Liu
Shen-min Chen
Chun-hao Wang
Chen-yi Shao
Bao-wei Ren
Li Tang
author_facet Babiker Saad Almugadam
Mihad Khaleil Ibrahim
Yinhui Liu
Shen-min Chen
Chun-hao Wang
Chen-yi Shao
Bao-wei Ren
Li Tang
author_sort Babiker Saad Almugadam
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Globally, urogenital and intestinal parasitosis remain significant health challenges. They are associated with rising morbidity, death, and many harmful outcomes. A little is known concerning parasitosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our study planned to investigate the urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections among type 2 diabetes patients compare to non-diabetic (Control) individuals and examine the intensity of helminthiasis in both groups. Methods At Kosti Teaching Hospital (Sudan), 300 Urine and 300 stool samples have collected from 150 type 2 diabetes and 150 control individuals, along with the socio-demographic data using a structured questionnaire. The parasitic infections were examined by direct sedimentation technique for urine specimens. Whereas, for fecal samples, simple-direct saline, formal-ether concentration, Kato-Katz, and modified Ziehl–Neelsen techniques were used. Results Out of 150 type 2 diabetes patients studied, 31 (20.6%) and 14 (9.3%) had intestinal parasitosis and urogenital schistosomiasis, respectively. Whereas, 16 (10.6%) and 8 (5.3%) of the control group were infected, respectively. Compared to the control group, the odds of testing positive for either urogenital schistosomiasis (AOR: 2.548, 95% CI: 0.836–7.761, P = 0.100) or intestinal parasitic diseases (AOR: 2.099, 95% CI: 0.973–4.531, P = 0.059) were greater in diabetic individuals. Likewise, the intensities of helminthiasis were much higher in the diabetic patients and positively correlated with the duration of illness. The rate of urogenital schistosomiasis was also significantly different among the disease duration subcategories. Conclusions Our study has highlighted the relationship of type 2 diabetes with urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections and enhanced our knowledge about the frequency of particular urogenital and intestinal parasites as well as the intensity of helminths infection in type 2 diabetes compared to non-diabetic individuals, which are important for further studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T13:43:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-400c907251a14a5b876d3298d216d20b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2334
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T13:43:06Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj.art-400c907251a14a5b876d3298d216d20b2022-12-21T19:38:45ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342021-01-012111910.1186/s12879-020-05629-9Association of urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections with type 2 diabetes individuals: a comparative studyBabiker Saad Almugadam0Mihad Khaleil Ibrahim1Yinhui Liu2Shen-min Chen3Chun-hao Wang4Chen-yi Shao5Bao-wei Ren6Li Tang7Department of Microecology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical UniversityDepartment of Medicine, Kosti Teaching HospitalDepartment of Microecology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical UniversityDepartment of Microecology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical UniversityDepartment of Microecology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical UniversityDepartment of Microecology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical UniversityDepartment of Microecology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical UniversityDepartment of Microecology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical UniversityAbstract Background Globally, urogenital and intestinal parasitosis remain significant health challenges. They are associated with rising morbidity, death, and many harmful outcomes. A little is known concerning parasitosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our study planned to investigate the urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections among type 2 diabetes patients compare to non-diabetic (Control) individuals and examine the intensity of helminthiasis in both groups. Methods At Kosti Teaching Hospital (Sudan), 300 Urine and 300 stool samples have collected from 150 type 2 diabetes and 150 control individuals, along with the socio-demographic data using a structured questionnaire. The parasitic infections were examined by direct sedimentation technique for urine specimens. Whereas, for fecal samples, simple-direct saline, formal-ether concentration, Kato-Katz, and modified Ziehl–Neelsen techniques were used. Results Out of 150 type 2 diabetes patients studied, 31 (20.6%) and 14 (9.3%) had intestinal parasitosis and urogenital schistosomiasis, respectively. Whereas, 16 (10.6%) and 8 (5.3%) of the control group were infected, respectively. Compared to the control group, the odds of testing positive for either urogenital schistosomiasis (AOR: 2.548, 95% CI: 0.836–7.761, P = 0.100) or intestinal parasitic diseases (AOR: 2.099, 95% CI: 0.973–4.531, P = 0.059) were greater in diabetic individuals. Likewise, the intensities of helminthiasis were much higher in the diabetic patients and positively correlated with the duration of illness. The rate of urogenital schistosomiasis was also significantly different among the disease duration subcategories. Conclusions Our study has highlighted the relationship of type 2 diabetes with urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections and enhanced our knowledge about the frequency of particular urogenital and intestinal parasites as well as the intensity of helminths infection in type 2 diabetes compared to non-diabetic individuals, which are important for further studies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05629-9HelminthiasisIntestinal parasitic infectionsParasitosisSchistosomiasisType 2 diabetes mellitus
spellingShingle Babiker Saad Almugadam
Mihad Khaleil Ibrahim
Yinhui Liu
Shen-min Chen
Chun-hao Wang
Chen-yi Shao
Bao-wei Ren
Li Tang
Association of urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections with type 2 diabetes individuals: a comparative study
BMC Infectious Diseases
Helminthiasis
Intestinal parasitic infections
Parasitosis
Schistosomiasis
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
title Association of urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections with type 2 diabetes individuals: a comparative study
title_full Association of urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections with type 2 diabetes individuals: a comparative study
title_fullStr Association of urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections with type 2 diabetes individuals: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Association of urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections with type 2 diabetes individuals: a comparative study
title_short Association of urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections with type 2 diabetes individuals: a comparative study
title_sort association of urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections with type 2 diabetes individuals a comparative study
topic Helminthiasis
Intestinal parasitic infections
Parasitosis
Schistosomiasis
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05629-9
work_keys_str_mv AT babikersaadalmugadam associationofurogenitalandintestinalparasiticinfectionswithtype2diabetesindividualsacomparativestudy
AT mihadkhaleilibrahim associationofurogenitalandintestinalparasiticinfectionswithtype2diabetesindividualsacomparativestudy
AT yinhuiliu associationofurogenitalandintestinalparasiticinfectionswithtype2diabetesindividualsacomparativestudy
AT shenminchen associationofurogenitalandintestinalparasiticinfectionswithtype2diabetesindividualsacomparativestudy
AT chunhaowang associationofurogenitalandintestinalparasiticinfectionswithtype2diabetesindividualsacomparativestudy
AT chenyishao associationofurogenitalandintestinalparasiticinfectionswithtype2diabetesindividualsacomparativestudy
AT baoweiren associationofurogenitalandintestinalparasiticinfectionswithtype2diabetesindividualsacomparativestudy
AT litang associationofurogenitalandintestinalparasiticinfectionswithtype2diabetesindividualsacomparativestudy