Assessment of the Effects of Commercial or Locally Engineered Biochars Produced from Different Biomass Sources and Differing in Their Physical and Chemical Properties on Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production In Vitro

In recent years, interest in using biochar as feed additives to mitigate enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from ruminants has increased. It has been suggested that the mitigating potential of biochar is influenced by its physical (e.g., porosity-related) and chemical (e.g., redo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaouki Benchaar, Fadi Hassanat, Cristiano Côrtes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/20/3280
_version_ 1797574939049459712
author Chaouki Benchaar
Fadi Hassanat
Cristiano Côrtes
author_facet Chaouki Benchaar
Fadi Hassanat
Cristiano Côrtes
author_sort Chaouki Benchaar
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, interest in using biochar as feed additives to mitigate enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from ruminants has increased. It has been suggested that the mitigating potential of biochar is influenced by its physical (e.g., porosity-related) and chemical (e.g., redox-potential-related) properties. Thus, the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of commercial or locally engineered biochars, produced from different biomass sources and differing in their physical and chemical characteristics, on rumen fermentation and CH<sub>4</sub> production. For this purpose, a 24 h batch culture of ruminal fluid incubations was conducted in a complete randomized block design (repeated three times) that included a negative control (no additive), a positive control (monensin, 10 mg/mL), and four commercial and three locally engineered biochars, each evaluated at 1%, 2%, or 5% of the substrate’s (i.e., the total mixed ration) dry matter. The evaluated biochars greatly differ in their chemical (i.e., moisture, ash, pH, redox potential, volatiles, carbon, fixed carbon, hydrogen, and sulfur) and physical (i.e., fine particles < 250 µm, bulk density, true density, porosity, electrical conductivity, specific surface area, and absorbed CO<sub>2</sub>) properties. Despite these differences and compared with the negative control, none of the biochars evaluated (regardless of the inclusion rate) influenced gas and CH<sub>4</sub> production, volatile fatty acid characteristics (total concentration and profile), or ammonia-nitrogen (NH<sub>3</sub>-N) concentrations. As expected, monensin (i.e., the positive control) decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) CH<sub>4</sub> production mainly because of a decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) acetate-to-propionate ratio. The results of this study reveal that despite the large differences in the physical and chemical properties of the biochars evaluated, their inclusion at different rates in vitro failed to modify rumen fermentation and decrease CH<sub>4</sub> production. Based on these in vitro findings, it was concluded that biochar does not represent a viable strategy for mitigating enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T21:29:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-401bdac5a3d34b1597e169b1a1bab7e6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T21:29:13Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-401bdac5a3d34b1597e169b1a1bab7e62023-11-19T15:25:40ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152023-10-011320328010.3390/ani13203280Assessment of the Effects of Commercial or Locally Engineered Biochars Produced from Different Biomass Sources and Differing in Their Physical and Chemical Properties on Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production In VitroChaouki Benchaar0Fadi Hassanat1Cristiano Côrtes2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Sherbrooke, QC J1M 0C8, CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Quebec Research and Development Centre, Quebec, QC G1V 2J3, CanadaAgrinova, Alma, QC G8B 7S8, CanadaIn recent years, interest in using biochar as feed additives to mitigate enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from ruminants has increased. It has been suggested that the mitigating potential of biochar is influenced by its physical (e.g., porosity-related) and chemical (e.g., redox-potential-related) properties. Thus, the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of commercial or locally engineered biochars, produced from different biomass sources and differing in their physical and chemical characteristics, on rumen fermentation and CH<sub>4</sub> production. For this purpose, a 24 h batch culture of ruminal fluid incubations was conducted in a complete randomized block design (repeated three times) that included a negative control (no additive), a positive control (monensin, 10 mg/mL), and four commercial and three locally engineered biochars, each evaluated at 1%, 2%, or 5% of the substrate’s (i.e., the total mixed ration) dry matter. The evaluated biochars greatly differ in their chemical (i.e., moisture, ash, pH, redox potential, volatiles, carbon, fixed carbon, hydrogen, and sulfur) and physical (i.e., fine particles < 250 µm, bulk density, true density, porosity, electrical conductivity, specific surface area, and absorbed CO<sub>2</sub>) properties. Despite these differences and compared with the negative control, none of the biochars evaluated (regardless of the inclusion rate) influenced gas and CH<sub>4</sub> production, volatile fatty acid characteristics (total concentration and profile), or ammonia-nitrogen (NH<sub>3</sub>-N) concentrations. As expected, monensin (i.e., the positive control) decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) CH<sub>4</sub> production mainly because of a decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) acetate-to-propionate ratio. The results of this study reveal that despite the large differences in the physical and chemical properties of the biochars evaluated, their inclusion at different rates in vitro failed to modify rumen fermentation and decrease CH<sub>4</sub> production. Based on these in vitro findings, it was concluded that biochar does not represent a viable strategy for mitigating enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/20/3280biocharmethane productionin vitro
spellingShingle Chaouki Benchaar
Fadi Hassanat
Cristiano Côrtes
Assessment of the Effects of Commercial or Locally Engineered Biochars Produced from Different Biomass Sources and Differing in Their Physical and Chemical Properties on Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production In Vitro
Animals
biochar
methane production
in vitro
title Assessment of the Effects of Commercial or Locally Engineered Biochars Produced from Different Biomass Sources and Differing in Their Physical and Chemical Properties on Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production In Vitro
title_full Assessment of the Effects of Commercial or Locally Engineered Biochars Produced from Different Biomass Sources and Differing in Their Physical and Chemical Properties on Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production In Vitro
title_fullStr Assessment of the Effects of Commercial or Locally Engineered Biochars Produced from Different Biomass Sources and Differing in Their Physical and Chemical Properties on Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production In Vitro
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Effects of Commercial or Locally Engineered Biochars Produced from Different Biomass Sources and Differing in Their Physical and Chemical Properties on Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production In Vitro
title_short Assessment of the Effects of Commercial or Locally Engineered Biochars Produced from Different Biomass Sources and Differing in Their Physical and Chemical Properties on Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production In Vitro
title_sort assessment of the effects of commercial or locally engineered biochars produced from different biomass sources and differing in their physical and chemical properties on rumen fermentation and methane production in vitro
topic biochar
methane production
in vitro
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/20/3280
work_keys_str_mv AT chaoukibenchaar assessmentoftheeffectsofcommercialorlocallyengineeredbiocharsproducedfromdifferentbiomasssourcesanddifferingintheirphysicalandchemicalpropertiesonrumenfermentationandmethaneproductioninvitro
AT fadihassanat assessmentoftheeffectsofcommercialorlocallyengineeredbiocharsproducedfromdifferentbiomasssourcesanddifferingintheirphysicalandchemicalpropertiesonrumenfermentationandmethaneproductioninvitro
AT cristianocortes assessmentoftheeffectsofcommercialorlocallyengineeredbiocharsproducedfromdifferentbiomasssourcesanddifferingintheirphysicalandchemicalpropertiesonrumenfermentationandmethaneproductioninvitro