Differences in the position of endometriosis-associated and non-associated ovarian cancer relative to the uterus

Abstract Background Preoperative assessment of the histological type of ovarian cancer is essential to determine the appropriate treatment strategy. Tumor location may be helpful in this regard. The purpose of this study was to compare the position of endometriosis-associated (EAOCs) and non-associa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsukasa Saida, Kensaku Mori, Toshitaka Ishiguro, Yukihisa Saida, Toyomi Satoh, Takahito Nakajima
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-08-01
Series:Insights into Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01468-9
_version_ 1797452388823465984
author Tsukasa Saida
Kensaku Mori
Toshitaka Ishiguro
Yukihisa Saida
Toyomi Satoh
Takahito Nakajima
author_facet Tsukasa Saida
Kensaku Mori
Toshitaka Ishiguro
Yukihisa Saida
Toyomi Satoh
Takahito Nakajima
author_sort Tsukasa Saida
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Preoperative assessment of the histological type of ovarian cancer is essential to determine the appropriate treatment strategy. Tumor location may be helpful in this regard. The purpose of this study was to compare the position of endometriosis-associated (EAOCs) and non-associated (non-EAOCs) ovarian cancer relative to the uterus using MRI. Methods This retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed malignant epithelial ovarian tumors who underwent MRI at our hospital between January 2015 and January 2023. T2-weighted images of the sagittal and axial sections of the long axis of the uterine body were used for the analysis. Three blinded experienced radiologists independently interpreted the images and assessed whether the ovarian tumor was attached to the uterus, and the angle between the uterus and the tumor was measured. The presence of attachment and the measured angles were compared for each histology. In addition, the angles between EAOCs, including endometrioid carcinomas (ECs) and clear cell carcinomas (CCCs), were compared with non-EAOCs. Results In total, 184 women (mean age, 56 years; age range, 20–91 years) were evaluated. High-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) were significantly smaller than the others and had significantly less uterine attachment than CCCs (p < 0.01 for all readers). According to the mean of the measured angles, CCCs were positioned significantly more posteriorly than HGSCs and mucinous carcinomas (p < 0.02), and EAOCs were positioned significantly more posteriorly to the uterus than non-EAOCs (p < 0.01). Conclusion HGSCs are often not attached to the uterus, and EAOCs are positioned more posteriorly to the uterus than non-EAOCs. Critical relevance statement High-grade serous carcinomas were often not attached to the uterus, and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers were positioned more posteriorly to the uterus than non-endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers. Key points • The position of the ovarian tumor can be determined using MRI. • High-grade serous carcinomas had less attachment to the uterus. • Endometriosis-associated cancers were positioned more posteriorly to the uterus. • The location of ovarian tumors is helpful in estimating histology. Graphical abstract
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:07:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-40264a9bf65442a9ba4995b14f31a7ab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1869-4101
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:07:43Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Insights into Imaging
spelling doaj.art-40264a9bf65442a9ba4995b14f31a7ab2023-11-26T13:33:04ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012023-08-0114111010.1186/s13244-023-01468-9Differences in the position of endometriosis-associated and non-associated ovarian cancer relative to the uterusTsukasa Saida0Kensaku Mori1Toshitaka Ishiguro2Yukihisa Saida3Toyomi Satoh4Takahito Nakajima5Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of TsukubaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of TsukubaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of TsukubaDepartment of Radiology, St. Luke’s International HospitalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of TsukubaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of TsukubaAbstract Background Preoperative assessment of the histological type of ovarian cancer is essential to determine the appropriate treatment strategy. Tumor location may be helpful in this regard. The purpose of this study was to compare the position of endometriosis-associated (EAOCs) and non-associated (non-EAOCs) ovarian cancer relative to the uterus using MRI. Methods This retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed malignant epithelial ovarian tumors who underwent MRI at our hospital between January 2015 and January 2023. T2-weighted images of the sagittal and axial sections of the long axis of the uterine body were used for the analysis. Three blinded experienced radiologists independently interpreted the images and assessed whether the ovarian tumor was attached to the uterus, and the angle between the uterus and the tumor was measured. The presence of attachment and the measured angles were compared for each histology. In addition, the angles between EAOCs, including endometrioid carcinomas (ECs) and clear cell carcinomas (CCCs), were compared with non-EAOCs. Results In total, 184 women (mean age, 56 years; age range, 20–91 years) were evaluated. High-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) were significantly smaller than the others and had significantly less uterine attachment than CCCs (p < 0.01 for all readers). According to the mean of the measured angles, CCCs were positioned significantly more posteriorly than HGSCs and mucinous carcinomas (p < 0.02), and EAOCs were positioned significantly more posteriorly to the uterus than non-EAOCs (p < 0.01). Conclusion HGSCs are often not attached to the uterus, and EAOCs are positioned more posteriorly to the uterus than non-EAOCs. Critical relevance statement High-grade serous carcinomas were often not attached to the uterus, and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers were positioned more posteriorly to the uterus than non-endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers. Key points • The position of the ovarian tumor can be determined using MRI. • High-grade serous carcinomas had less attachment to the uterus. • Endometriosis-associated cancers were positioned more posteriorly to the uterus. • The location of ovarian tumors is helpful in estimating histology. Graphical abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01468-9OvaryCarcinomaMagnetic resonance imagingLocation
spellingShingle Tsukasa Saida
Kensaku Mori
Toshitaka Ishiguro
Yukihisa Saida
Toyomi Satoh
Takahito Nakajima
Differences in the position of endometriosis-associated and non-associated ovarian cancer relative to the uterus
Insights into Imaging
Ovary
Carcinoma
Magnetic resonance imaging
Location
title Differences in the position of endometriosis-associated and non-associated ovarian cancer relative to the uterus
title_full Differences in the position of endometriosis-associated and non-associated ovarian cancer relative to the uterus
title_fullStr Differences in the position of endometriosis-associated and non-associated ovarian cancer relative to the uterus
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the position of endometriosis-associated and non-associated ovarian cancer relative to the uterus
title_short Differences in the position of endometriosis-associated and non-associated ovarian cancer relative to the uterus
title_sort differences in the position of endometriosis associated and non associated ovarian cancer relative to the uterus
topic Ovary
Carcinoma
Magnetic resonance imaging
Location
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01468-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tsukasasaida differencesinthepositionofendometriosisassociatedandnonassociatedovariancancerrelativetotheuterus
AT kensakumori differencesinthepositionofendometriosisassociatedandnonassociatedovariancancerrelativetotheuterus
AT toshitakaishiguro differencesinthepositionofendometriosisassociatedandnonassociatedovariancancerrelativetotheuterus
AT yukihisasaida differencesinthepositionofendometriosisassociatedandnonassociatedovariancancerrelativetotheuterus
AT toyomisatoh differencesinthepositionofendometriosisassociatedandnonassociatedovariancancerrelativetotheuterus
AT takahitonakajima differencesinthepositionofendometriosisassociatedandnonassociatedovariancancerrelativetotheuterus