Protocolised way to cope with anatomical changes in head & neck cancer during the course of radiotherapy

Introduction: During a course of radiotherapy for head-and-neck-cancer (HNC), non-rigid anatomical changes can be observed on daily Cone Beam CT (CBCT). To objectify responses to these changes, we use a decision support system (traffic light protocol). Action levels orange and red may lead to re-pla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suzanne van Beek, Marcel Jonker, Olga Hamming-Vrieze, Abrahim Al-Mamgani, Arash Navran, Peter Remeijer, Jeroen B. van de Kamer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-12-01
Series:Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632419300204
_version_ 1818996139836309504
author Suzanne van Beek
Marcel Jonker
Olga Hamming-Vrieze
Abrahim Al-Mamgani
Arash Navran
Peter Remeijer
Jeroen B. van de Kamer
author_facet Suzanne van Beek
Marcel Jonker
Olga Hamming-Vrieze
Abrahim Al-Mamgani
Arash Navran
Peter Remeijer
Jeroen B. van de Kamer
author_sort Suzanne van Beek
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: During a course of radiotherapy for head-and-neck-cancer (HNC), non-rigid anatomical changes can be observed on daily Cone Beam CT (CBCT). To objectify responses to these changes, we use a decision support system (traffic light protocol). Action levels orange and red may lead to re-planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how often re-planning was done for non-rigid anatomical changes, which anatomical changes led to re-planning and in which subgroups of patients treatment adaptation was deemed necessary. Materials and methods: A consecutive series of 388 HNC patients were retrospectively selected using the digital log of CBCT scans. The logs were analyzed for the number of new plans on an original planning CT scan (O-pCT) or a new pCT scan (N-pCT). Reasons for re-planning were categorized into: target volume increase/decrease, body contour decrease/increase and local shift of target volume. Subgroup analysis was performed to investigate relative differences of re-planning between treatment modalities. Results: For 33 patients the treatment plan was adapted due to anatomical changes, resulting in 37 new plans in total. Re-planning on a N-pCT with complete re-delineation was done 22 times. In fifteen cases a new plan was created after adjustment of contours on the O-pCT. Main reasons for re-planning were target volume increase, body contour decrease and local shifts of target volume. Most re-planning (23%) was seen in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Conclusion: Visual detection of anatomical changes on CBCT during treatment of HNC, results in re-planning in 1 out of 10 patients. Keywords: Head and neck cancer, Cone beam CT, Image guided radiotherapy, Traffic light protocol, Anatomical changes, Adaptive delivery
first_indexed 2024-12-20T21:25:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4029f30d0c5440c48aae6504522678ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-6324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T21:25:00Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-4029f30d0c5440c48aae6504522678ee2022-12-21T19:26:10ZengElsevierTechnical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology2405-63242019-12-01123440Protocolised way to cope with anatomical changes in head & neck cancer during the course of radiotherapySuzanne van Beek0Marcel Jonker1Olga Hamming-Vrieze2Abrahim Al-Mamgani3Arash Navran4Peter Remeijer5Jeroen B. van de Kamer6Corresponding author.; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the NetherlandsIntroduction: During a course of radiotherapy for head-and-neck-cancer (HNC), non-rigid anatomical changes can be observed on daily Cone Beam CT (CBCT). To objectify responses to these changes, we use a decision support system (traffic light protocol). Action levels orange and red may lead to re-planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how often re-planning was done for non-rigid anatomical changes, which anatomical changes led to re-planning and in which subgroups of patients treatment adaptation was deemed necessary. Materials and methods: A consecutive series of 388 HNC patients were retrospectively selected using the digital log of CBCT scans. The logs were analyzed for the number of new plans on an original planning CT scan (O-pCT) or a new pCT scan (N-pCT). Reasons for re-planning were categorized into: target volume increase/decrease, body contour decrease/increase and local shift of target volume. Subgroup analysis was performed to investigate relative differences of re-planning between treatment modalities. Results: For 33 patients the treatment plan was adapted due to anatomical changes, resulting in 37 new plans in total. Re-planning on a N-pCT with complete re-delineation was done 22 times. In fifteen cases a new plan was created after adjustment of contours on the O-pCT. Main reasons for re-planning were target volume increase, body contour decrease and local shifts of target volume. Most re-planning (23%) was seen in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Conclusion: Visual detection of anatomical changes on CBCT during treatment of HNC, results in re-planning in 1 out of 10 patients. Keywords: Head and neck cancer, Cone beam CT, Image guided radiotherapy, Traffic light protocol, Anatomical changes, Adaptive deliveryhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632419300204
spellingShingle Suzanne van Beek
Marcel Jonker
Olga Hamming-Vrieze
Abrahim Al-Mamgani
Arash Navran
Peter Remeijer
Jeroen B. van de Kamer
Protocolised way to cope with anatomical changes in head & neck cancer during the course of radiotherapy
Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
title Protocolised way to cope with anatomical changes in head & neck cancer during the course of radiotherapy
title_full Protocolised way to cope with anatomical changes in head & neck cancer during the course of radiotherapy
title_fullStr Protocolised way to cope with anatomical changes in head & neck cancer during the course of radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Protocolised way to cope with anatomical changes in head & neck cancer during the course of radiotherapy
title_short Protocolised way to cope with anatomical changes in head & neck cancer during the course of radiotherapy
title_sort protocolised way to cope with anatomical changes in head neck cancer during the course of radiotherapy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632419300204
work_keys_str_mv AT suzannevanbeek protocolisedwaytocopewithanatomicalchangesinheadneckcancerduringthecourseofradiotherapy
AT marceljonker protocolisedwaytocopewithanatomicalchangesinheadneckcancerduringthecourseofradiotherapy
AT olgahammingvrieze protocolisedwaytocopewithanatomicalchangesinheadneckcancerduringthecourseofradiotherapy
AT abrahimalmamgani protocolisedwaytocopewithanatomicalchangesinheadneckcancerduringthecourseofradiotherapy
AT arashnavran protocolisedwaytocopewithanatomicalchangesinheadneckcancerduringthecourseofradiotherapy
AT peterremeijer protocolisedwaytocopewithanatomicalchangesinheadneckcancerduringthecourseofradiotherapy
AT jeroenbvandekamer protocolisedwaytocopewithanatomicalchangesinheadneckcancerduringthecourseofradiotherapy