Abstract 095: Pulsatile Tinnitus from An Enlarged Mastoid Emissary Vein: Successful Management with Endovascular Embolization

Introduction Tinnitus is a prevalent condition, affecting approximately 10% of the population. It can be categorized into vascular (pulsatile) and nonvascular (non‐pulsatile) based on its rhythmic quality in sync with the heartbeat (1). Recent literature identifies venous etiologies as the most comm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David C. Clark, Cleo Zarina Reyes, Hussein H. Nasser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-11-01
Series:Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.095
_version_ 1797221200965926912
author David C. Clark
Cleo Zarina Reyes
Hussein H. Nasser
author_facet David C. Clark
Cleo Zarina Reyes
Hussein H. Nasser
author_sort David C. Clark
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Tinnitus is a prevalent condition, affecting approximately 10% of the population. It can be categorized into vascular (pulsatile) and nonvascular (non‐pulsatile) based on its rhythmic quality in sync with the heartbeat (1). Recent literature identifies venous etiologies as the most common cause of pulsatile tinnitus, including venous sinus stenosis, venous diverticula, and the less common enlarged mastoid emissary vein (MEV). Emissary veins are residual connections between the extracranial venous system of the head and the intracranial venous system. Although rare, pathologically enlarged MEVs have been recognized as a cause of pulsatile tinnitus. Endovascular treatment is a novel approach for these patients, offering a safe and quicker recovery compared to traditional open surgical options (2). Here, we present a case of a young woman with debilitating pulsatile tinnitus due to an enlarged MEV, with technically successful treatment via endovascular embolization. Methods A 42‐year‐old female presented with left pulsatile tinnitus, imbalance, and headaches following a motor vehicle collision two years prior. Her symptoms included a persistent “whooshing” sound at rest, exacerbated by strenuous physical activity. A tinnitus handicap inventory score of Grade 4‐5 (severe to catastrophic) confirmed the severity of her condition. After ruling out other malignant causes through extensive imaging, a CT scan revealed an enlarged 4.4mm left mastoid emissary vein. Diagnostic suspicions were confirmed by physical examination with superficial compression of the vein along the mastoid region, effectively eliminating the tinnitus. A cerebral angiogram subsequently confirmed an enlarged 5.2mm left MEV, while excluding other malignant arterial or arteriovenous etiologies. After discussing surgical options with neurosurgery and ENT specialists, the patient chose to pursue endovascular intervention. Using a transvenous approach, a coaxial construct of a guide catheter with microcatheter was navigated into the emissary vein, with technically successful coil embolization/sacrifice of the MEV. Post embolization angiogram demonstrated complete occlusion of the MEV with preserved arterial, parenchymal, and venous phases on cerebral angiogram. No procedural complications were reported. Results Following the procedure, the patient reported complete resolution of her symptoms. At one‐month follow‐up, she experienced an occasional pulsatile sensation in the left ear, lasting less than one hour per day. The post‐procedural tinnitus handicap inventory scoring was 1, indicating significant improvement in her quality of life, and she resumed an essentially normal daily routine. Conclusion This case highlights the successful management of pulsatile tinnitus caused by an enlarged MEV through endovascular intervention, offering a new and safe alternative to traditional surgical treatments. Although emissary veins have been implicated as a venous cause of pulsatile tinnitus, reports of this specific etiology (mastoid emissary vein) and endovascular treatment remain limited (3),(4). The considerable improvement in the patient’s quality of life, rapid post‐procedural recovery, and minimally invasive nature of the procedure makes this approach a promising alternative for the management of pathologically enlarged MEVs as a cause of pulsatile tinnitus.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:38:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4037382812774930991644ad50581ee3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2694-5746
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:01:40Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
spelling doaj.art-4037382812774930991644ad50581ee32024-04-05T10:51:58ZengWileyStroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology2694-57462023-11-013S210.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.095Abstract 095: Pulsatile Tinnitus from An Enlarged Mastoid Emissary Vein: Successful Management with Endovascular EmbolizationDavid C. Clark0Cleo Zarina Reyes1Hussein H. Nasser2University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine Pennsylvania United StatesLehigh Valley Health Network Pennsylvania United StatesLehigh Valley Health Network Pennsylvania United StatesIntroduction Tinnitus is a prevalent condition, affecting approximately 10% of the population. It can be categorized into vascular (pulsatile) and nonvascular (non‐pulsatile) based on its rhythmic quality in sync with the heartbeat (1). Recent literature identifies venous etiologies as the most common cause of pulsatile tinnitus, including venous sinus stenosis, venous diverticula, and the less common enlarged mastoid emissary vein (MEV). Emissary veins are residual connections between the extracranial venous system of the head and the intracranial venous system. Although rare, pathologically enlarged MEVs have been recognized as a cause of pulsatile tinnitus. Endovascular treatment is a novel approach for these patients, offering a safe and quicker recovery compared to traditional open surgical options (2). Here, we present a case of a young woman with debilitating pulsatile tinnitus due to an enlarged MEV, with technically successful treatment via endovascular embolization. Methods A 42‐year‐old female presented with left pulsatile tinnitus, imbalance, and headaches following a motor vehicle collision two years prior. Her symptoms included a persistent “whooshing” sound at rest, exacerbated by strenuous physical activity. A tinnitus handicap inventory score of Grade 4‐5 (severe to catastrophic) confirmed the severity of her condition. After ruling out other malignant causes through extensive imaging, a CT scan revealed an enlarged 4.4mm left mastoid emissary vein. Diagnostic suspicions were confirmed by physical examination with superficial compression of the vein along the mastoid region, effectively eliminating the tinnitus. A cerebral angiogram subsequently confirmed an enlarged 5.2mm left MEV, while excluding other malignant arterial or arteriovenous etiologies. After discussing surgical options with neurosurgery and ENT specialists, the patient chose to pursue endovascular intervention. Using a transvenous approach, a coaxial construct of a guide catheter with microcatheter was navigated into the emissary vein, with technically successful coil embolization/sacrifice of the MEV. Post embolization angiogram demonstrated complete occlusion of the MEV with preserved arterial, parenchymal, and venous phases on cerebral angiogram. No procedural complications were reported. Results Following the procedure, the patient reported complete resolution of her symptoms. At one‐month follow‐up, she experienced an occasional pulsatile sensation in the left ear, lasting less than one hour per day. The post‐procedural tinnitus handicap inventory scoring was 1, indicating significant improvement in her quality of life, and she resumed an essentially normal daily routine. Conclusion This case highlights the successful management of pulsatile tinnitus caused by an enlarged MEV through endovascular intervention, offering a new and safe alternative to traditional surgical treatments. Although emissary veins have been implicated as a venous cause of pulsatile tinnitus, reports of this specific etiology (mastoid emissary vein) and endovascular treatment remain limited (3),(4). The considerable improvement in the patient’s quality of life, rapid post‐procedural recovery, and minimally invasive nature of the procedure makes this approach a promising alternative for the management of pathologically enlarged MEVs as a cause of pulsatile tinnitus.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.095
spellingShingle David C. Clark
Cleo Zarina Reyes
Hussein H. Nasser
Abstract 095: Pulsatile Tinnitus from An Enlarged Mastoid Emissary Vein: Successful Management with Endovascular Embolization
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
title Abstract 095: Pulsatile Tinnitus from An Enlarged Mastoid Emissary Vein: Successful Management with Endovascular Embolization
title_full Abstract 095: Pulsatile Tinnitus from An Enlarged Mastoid Emissary Vein: Successful Management with Endovascular Embolization
title_fullStr Abstract 095: Pulsatile Tinnitus from An Enlarged Mastoid Emissary Vein: Successful Management with Endovascular Embolization
title_full_unstemmed Abstract 095: Pulsatile Tinnitus from An Enlarged Mastoid Emissary Vein: Successful Management with Endovascular Embolization
title_short Abstract 095: Pulsatile Tinnitus from An Enlarged Mastoid Emissary Vein: Successful Management with Endovascular Embolization
title_sort abstract 095 pulsatile tinnitus from an enlarged mastoid emissary vein successful management with endovascular embolization
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.095
work_keys_str_mv AT davidcclark abstract095pulsatiletinnitusfromanenlargedmastoidemissaryveinsuccessfulmanagementwithendovascularembolization
AT cleozarinareyes abstract095pulsatiletinnitusfromanenlargedmastoidemissaryveinsuccessfulmanagementwithendovascularembolization
AT husseinhnasser abstract095pulsatiletinnitusfromanenlargedmastoidemissaryveinsuccessfulmanagementwithendovascularembolization