Mapping co-authorship network of Iranian researchers in the field of knowledge management
Background and aim: So far, many researches have been conducted on the co-authorship study of all authors of universities and organizations as one of the most important topics in the field of scientometrics in various fields and disciplines. The aim of this study was to map the co-authorship network...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Babol University of Medical Sciences
2019-11-01
|
| Series: | مجله علمسنجی کاسپین |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cjs.mubabol.ac.ir/article-1-184-en.pdf |
| Summary: | Background and aim: So far, many researches have been conducted on the
co-authorship study of all authors of universities and organizations as one of the most important topics in the field of scientometrics in various fields and disciplines. The aim of this study was to map the co-authorship network of Iranian researchers in the field of knowledge management in Web of Science (WoS).
Material and methods: In this descriptive-survey study with a scientometric approach, the title "Knowledge Management" was used to collect data and 3015 records were retrieved. After entering the required data into Excel, the records were separated by two or more authors, and the required graphs and tables were drawn. The maps used in the study were drawn using VOSviewer.
Findings: The results showed that the highest amount of Iranian researchers' scientific output was in 2017 and the lowest in 2010. Moreover, the highest outputs were in the fields of knowledge management, engineering, environmental science and computer science. Among the 1680 organizations involved in scientific outputs of Iranian researchers in the field of knowledge management, the Islamic Azad University and University of Tehran received the first and second rank in joint organizational outputs, respectively. Salehi and Ahmadi had the most collaboration on the researchers' scientific communication network. The most collaboration of Iranian authors was with authors from the USA, Canada, Britain and Australia, respectively.
Conclusion: The findings indicated some ups and downs in the release process of scientific outputs in the field of knowledge management. The results showed that scholars and authors of Iranian universities had little interest in national
co-authorship and had the highest cooperation with developed countries. Changing universities' incentive policies will be effective in correcting this and improving the country's ranking. Researchers can achieve this by sharing knowledge and new information tools and membership in national co-authorship networks in this field. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2423-4710 2383-157X |