The ionospheric response over the UK to major bombing raids during World War II

<p>The Earth's ionosphere is subject to disturbance from above (via solar variability and space-weather effects) and from below (such as tectonic activity, thunderstorms and sudden stratospheric warmings). Identifying the relative contribution of these effects remains challenging, desp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. J. Scott, P. Major
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-09-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/36/1243/2018/angeo-36-1243-2018.pdf
_version_ 1819160291933421568
author C. J. Scott
P. Major
author_facet C. J. Scott
P. Major
author_sort C. J. Scott
collection DOAJ
description <p>The Earth's ionosphere is subject to disturbance from above (via solar variability and space-weather effects) and from below (such as tectonic activity, thunderstorms and sudden stratospheric warmings). Identifying the relative contribution of these effects remains challenging, despite recent advances in spacecraft monitoring near-Earth space. Man-made explosions provide a quantifiable proxy for natural terrestrial sources, enabling their impact on ionospheric variability to be studied. In this paper, the contribution of ground-based disturbances to ionospheric variability is investigated by considering the response of the ionospheric F2 layer over Slough, UK, to 152 major bombing raids over Europe during World War II, using a superposed epoch analysis. The median response of the F2 layer is a significant decrease in peak electron concentration ( ∼ 0.3&thinsp;MHz decrease in <i>fo</i>F2). This response is consistent with wave energy heating the thermosphere, enhancing the (temperature-dependent) loss rate of O<sup>+</sup> ions. The analysis was repeated for a range of thresholds in both time of bombing before the (noon) ionospheric measurement and tonnage of bombs dropped per raid. It was found that significant ( ∼ 2–3<i>σ</i>) deviations from the mean occurred for events occurring between approximately 3 and 7&thinsp;h ahead of the noon ionospheric measurements and for raids using a minimum of between 100 and 800&thinsp;t of high explosives. The most significant ionospheric response (2.99<i>σ</i>) occurred for 20 raids up to 5&thinsp;h before the ionospheric measurement, each with a minimum of 300&thinsp;t of explosives. To ensure that the observed ionospheric response cannot be attributable to space-weather sources, the analysis was restricted to those events for which the geomagnetic Ap index was less than 48 (Kp &lt; 5). Digitisation of the early ionospheric data would enable the investigation into the response of additional ionospheric parameters (sporadic E, E and F1 layer heights and peak concentrations). One metric ton of TNT has an explosive energy of 4.184×10<sup>9</sup>&thinsp;J, which is of the same order of energy as a cloud to ground lightning stroke. Since the occurrence of lightning has distinctive diurnal and seasonal cycles, it is feasible that a similar mechanism could contribute to the observed seasonal anomaly in ionospheric F-region electron concentrations. Further investigation, using less extreme examples, is required to determine the minimum explosive energy required to generate a detectable ionospheric response.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-22T16:54:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-403e852604de428c8fcc351fedb2daa8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T16:54:07Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Annales Geophysicae
spelling doaj.art-403e852604de428c8fcc351fedb2daa82022-12-21T18:19:30ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762018-09-01361243125410.5194/angeo-36-1243-2018The ionospheric response over the UK to major bombing raids during World War IIC. J. Scott0P. Major1Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Berkshire, UKDepartment of History, University of Reading, Berkshire, UK<p>The Earth's ionosphere is subject to disturbance from above (via solar variability and space-weather effects) and from below (such as tectonic activity, thunderstorms and sudden stratospheric warmings). Identifying the relative contribution of these effects remains challenging, despite recent advances in spacecraft monitoring near-Earth space. Man-made explosions provide a quantifiable proxy for natural terrestrial sources, enabling their impact on ionospheric variability to be studied. In this paper, the contribution of ground-based disturbances to ionospheric variability is investigated by considering the response of the ionospheric F2 layer over Slough, UK, to 152 major bombing raids over Europe during World War II, using a superposed epoch analysis. The median response of the F2 layer is a significant decrease in peak electron concentration ( ∼ 0.3&thinsp;MHz decrease in <i>fo</i>F2). This response is consistent with wave energy heating the thermosphere, enhancing the (temperature-dependent) loss rate of O<sup>+</sup> ions. The analysis was repeated for a range of thresholds in both time of bombing before the (noon) ionospheric measurement and tonnage of bombs dropped per raid. It was found that significant ( ∼ 2–3<i>σ</i>) deviations from the mean occurred for events occurring between approximately 3 and 7&thinsp;h ahead of the noon ionospheric measurements and for raids using a minimum of between 100 and 800&thinsp;t of high explosives. The most significant ionospheric response (2.99<i>σ</i>) occurred for 20 raids up to 5&thinsp;h before the ionospheric measurement, each with a minimum of 300&thinsp;t of explosives. To ensure that the observed ionospheric response cannot be attributable to space-weather sources, the analysis was restricted to those events for which the geomagnetic Ap index was less than 48 (Kp &lt; 5). Digitisation of the early ionospheric data would enable the investigation into the response of additional ionospheric parameters (sporadic E, E and F1 layer heights and peak concentrations). One metric ton of TNT has an explosive energy of 4.184×10<sup>9</sup>&thinsp;J, which is of the same order of energy as a cloud to ground lightning stroke. Since the occurrence of lightning has distinctive diurnal and seasonal cycles, it is feasible that a similar mechanism could contribute to the observed seasonal anomaly in ionospheric F-region electron concentrations. Further investigation, using less extreme examples, is required to determine the minimum explosive energy required to generate a detectable ionospheric response.</p>https://www.ann-geophys.net/36/1243/2018/angeo-36-1243-2018.pdf
spellingShingle C. J. Scott
P. Major
The ionospheric response over the UK to major bombing raids during World War II
Annales Geophysicae
title The ionospheric response over the UK to major bombing raids during World War II
title_full The ionospheric response over the UK to major bombing raids during World War II
title_fullStr The ionospheric response over the UK to major bombing raids during World War II
title_full_unstemmed The ionospheric response over the UK to major bombing raids during World War II
title_short The ionospheric response over the UK to major bombing raids during World War II
title_sort ionospheric response over the uk to major bombing raids during world war ii
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/36/1243/2018/angeo-36-1243-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cjscott theionosphericresponseovertheuktomajorbombingraidsduringworldwarii
AT pmajor theionosphericresponseovertheuktomajorbombingraidsduringworldwarii
AT cjscott ionosphericresponseovertheuktomajorbombingraidsduringworldwarii
AT pmajor ionosphericresponseovertheuktomajorbombingraidsduringworldwarii