Assessment of height growth in Indian children using growth centiles and growth curves

Background Growth centiles and growth curves are two ways to present child anthropometry; however, they differ in the type of data used, the method of analysis, the biological parameters fitted and the form of interpretation. Aim To fit and compare height growth centiles and curves in Indian childre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra Aravind Areekal, Pranay Goel, Anuradha Khadilkar, Vaman Khadilkar, Tim J. Cole
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-08-01
Series:Annals of Human Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2022.2107238
_version_ 1827817912482660352
author Sandra Aravind Areekal
Pranay Goel
Anuradha Khadilkar
Vaman Khadilkar
Tim J. Cole
author_facet Sandra Aravind Areekal
Pranay Goel
Anuradha Khadilkar
Vaman Khadilkar
Tim J. Cole
author_sort Sandra Aravind Areekal
collection DOAJ
description Background Growth centiles and growth curves are two ways to present child anthropometry; however, they differ in the type of data used, the method of analysis, the biological parameters fitted and the form of interpretation. Aim To fit and compare height growth centiles and curves in Indian children. Subjects and methods 1468 children (796 boys) from Pune India aged 6–18 years with longitudinal data on age and height (n = 7781) were analysed using GAMLSS (Generalised Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape) for growth centiles, and SITAR (SuperImposition by Rotation and Translation) for growth curves. Results SITAR explained 98.7% and 98.8% of the height variance in boys and girls, with mean age at peak height velocity 13.1 and 11.0 years, and mean peak velocity 9.0 and 8.0 cm/year, respectively. GAMLSS (Box-Cox Cole Green model) also captured the pubertal growth spurt but the centiles were shallower than the SITAR mean curve. Boys showed a mid-growth spurt at age 8 years. Conclusion GAMLSS displays the distribution of height in the population by age and sex, while SITAR effectively and parsimoniously summarises the pattern of height growth in individual children. The two approaches provide distinct, useful information about child growth.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:40:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-403ee9fa095c4ddf89cd4f943410ec90
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4460
1464-5033
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:40:06Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Annals of Human Biology
spelling doaj.art-403ee9fa095c4ddf89cd4f943410ec902023-09-15T08:45:20ZengTaylor & Francis GroupAnnals of Human Biology0301-44601464-50332022-08-01495-622823510.1080/03014460.2022.21072382107238Assessment of height growth in Indian children using growth centiles and growth curvesSandra Aravind Areekal0Pranay Goel1Anuradha Khadilkar2Vaman Khadilkar3Tim J. Cole4Department of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and ResearchDepartment of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and ResearchHirabai Cowasji Jehangir Medical Research InstituteHirabai Cowasji Jehangir Medical Research InstitutePopulation, Policy and Practice Department, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthBackground Growth centiles and growth curves are two ways to present child anthropometry; however, they differ in the type of data used, the method of analysis, the biological parameters fitted and the form of interpretation. Aim To fit and compare height growth centiles and curves in Indian children. Subjects and methods 1468 children (796 boys) from Pune India aged 6–18 years with longitudinal data on age and height (n = 7781) were analysed using GAMLSS (Generalised Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape) for growth centiles, and SITAR (SuperImposition by Rotation and Translation) for growth curves. Results SITAR explained 98.7% and 98.8% of the height variance in boys and girls, with mean age at peak height velocity 13.1 and 11.0 years, and mean peak velocity 9.0 and 8.0 cm/year, respectively. GAMLSS (Box-Cox Cole Green model) also captured the pubertal growth spurt but the centiles were shallower than the SITAR mean curve. Boys showed a mid-growth spurt at age 8 years. Conclusion GAMLSS displays the distribution of height in the population by age and sex, while SITAR effectively and parsimoniously summarises the pattern of height growth in individual children. The two approaches provide distinct, useful information about child growth.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2022.2107238height centilesgrowth curvesgamlsssitarindia
spellingShingle Sandra Aravind Areekal
Pranay Goel
Anuradha Khadilkar
Vaman Khadilkar
Tim J. Cole
Assessment of height growth in Indian children using growth centiles and growth curves
Annals of Human Biology
height centiles
growth curves
gamlss
sitar
india
title Assessment of height growth in Indian children using growth centiles and growth curves
title_full Assessment of height growth in Indian children using growth centiles and growth curves
title_fullStr Assessment of height growth in Indian children using growth centiles and growth curves
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of height growth in Indian children using growth centiles and growth curves
title_short Assessment of height growth in Indian children using growth centiles and growth curves
title_sort assessment of height growth in indian children using growth centiles and growth curves
topic height centiles
growth curves
gamlss
sitar
india
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2022.2107238
work_keys_str_mv AT sandraaravindareekal assessmentofheightgrowthinindianchildrenusinggrowthcentilesandgrowthcurves
AT pranaygoel assessmentofheightgrowthinindianchildrenusinggrowthcentilesandgrowthcurves
AT anuradhakhadilkar assessmentofheightgrowthinindianchildrenusinggrowthcentilesandgrowthcurves
AT vamankhadilkar assessmentofheightgrowthinindianchildrenusinggrowthcentilesandgrowthcurves
AT timjcole assessmentofheightgrowthinindianchildrenusinggrowthcentilesandgrowthcurves