Resolution Sensitivity of the GRIST Nonhydrostatic Model From 120 to 5 km (3.75 km) During the DYAMOND Winter

Abstract We investigated the resolution sensitivity of the Global‐to‐Regional Integrated forecast SysTem global nonhydrostatic model characterized by explicit dynamics–microphysics coupling using varying uniform resolutions (120, 60, 30, 15, and 5 km). The experiments followed the DYnamics of the At...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Zhang, Xiaohan Li, Zhuang Liu, Xinyao Rong, Jian Li, Yihui Zhou, Suyang Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2022-09-01
Series:Earth and Space Science
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002401
_version_ 1828384919247650816
author Yi Zhang
Xiaohan Li
Zhuang Liu
Xinyao Rong
Jian Li
Yihui Zhou
Suyang Chen
author_facet Yi Zhang
Xiaohan Li
Zhuang Liu
Xinyao Rong
Jian Li
Yihui Zhou
Suyang Chen
author_sort Yi Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We investigated the resolution sensitivity of the Global‐to‐Regional Integrated forecast SysTem global nonhydrostatic model characterized by explicit dynamics–microphysics coupling using varying uniform resolutions (120, 60, 30, 15, and 5 km). The experiments followed the DYnamics of the Atmospheric general circulation Modeled On Non‐hydrostatic Domains (DYAMOND) winter protocol, which covers a 40‐day integration. These simulations did not activate parameterized convection. One 120 km test with parameterized convection was performed as a coarse‐resolution reference. Other model configurations for different simulations were kept as consistent as possible. Our results showed that the model gradually improved its representation of the fine‐scale features as the resolution increased. The 5 km simulation was overall close to a 3.75 km simulation during the first 12 days of the DYAMOND winter. With respect to the mean climate, the 5 km simulation had a more realistic rainfall distribution than the lower resolution explicit convection simulations. Cloud water and the related physical fields (e.g., shortwave cloud radiative forcing) had a large resolution sensitivity. The tropical rainfall frequency–intensity spectra became more realistic in the 5 km explicit convection simulation, but the 120 km run with parameterized convection showed a more realistic mean climate. As the resolution increases, the mean bulk effect of finely resolved model convection gradually converges to that of parameterized convection. The mean climate of this storm‐resolving model has slightly higher rainfall biases than a parameterized convection coarse‐resolution model, highlighting the importance of balancing resolved‐ and under‐resolved model convection for developing a unified multiscale global model.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T05:11:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-403f1f153ee849a3bf404f7f06285c5c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2333-5084
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T05:11:33Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Earth and Space Science
spelling doaj.art-403f1f153ee849a3bf404f7f06285c5c2022-12-22T02:01:05ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth and Space Science2333-50842022-09-0199n/an/a10.1029/2022EA002401Resolution Sensitivity of the GRIST Nonhydrostatic Model From 120 to 5 km (3.75 km) During the DYAMOND WinterYi Zhang0Xiaohan Li1Zhuang Liu2Xinyao Rong3Jian Li4Yihui Zhou5Suyang Chen6State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather (LASW) Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Severe Weather (LASW) Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Beijing ChinaDepartment of Earth System Science Tsinghua University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Severe Weather (LASW) Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Severe Weather (LASW) Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Severe Weather (LASW) Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Severe Weather (LASW) Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Beijing ChinaAbstract We investigated the resolution sensitivity of the Global‐to‐Regional Integrated forecast SysTem global nonhydrostatic model characterized by explicit dynamics–microphysics coupling using varying uniform resolutions (120, 60, 30, 15, and 5 km). The experiments followed the DYnamics of the Atmospheric general circulation Modeled On Non‐hydrostatic Domains (DYAMOND) winter protocol, which covers a 40‐day integration. These simulations did not activate parameterized convection. One 120 km test with parameterized convection was performed as a coarse‐resolution reference. Other model configurations for different simulations were kept as consistent as possible. Our results showed that the model gradually improved its representation of the fine‐scale features as the resolution increased. The 5 km simulation was overall close to a 3.75 km simulation during the first 12 days of the DYAMOND winter. With respect to the mean climate, the 5 km simulation had a more realistic rainfall distribution than the lower resolution explicit convection simulations. Cloud water and the related physical fields (e.g., shortwave cloud radiative forcing) had a large resolution sensitivity. The tropical rainfall frequency–intensity spectra became more realistic in the 5 km explicit convection simulation, but the 120 km run with parameterized convection showed a more realistic mean climate. As the resolution increases, the mean bulk effect of finely resolved model convection gradually converges to that of parameterized convection. The mean climate of this storm‐resolving model has slightly higher rainfall biases than a parameterized convection coarse‐resolution model, highlighting the importance of balancing resolved‐ and under‐resolved model convection for developing a unified multiscale global model.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002401
spellingShingle Yi Zhang
Xiaohan Li
Zhuang Liu
Xinyao Rong
Jian Li
Yihui Zhou
Suyang Chen
Resolution Sensitivity of the GRIST Nonhydrostatic Model From 120 to 5 km (3.75 km) During the DYAMOND Winter
Earth and Space Science
title Resolution Sensitivity of the GRIST Nonhydrostatic Model From 120 to 5 km (3.75 km) During the DYAMOND Winter
title_full Resolution Sensitivity of the GRIST Nonhydrostatic Model From 120 to 5 km (3.75 km) During the DYAMOND Winter
title_fullStr Resolution Sensitivity of the GRIST Nonhydrostatic Model From 120 to 5 km (3.75 km) During the DYAMOND Winter
title_full_unstemmed Resolution Sensitivity of the GRIST Nonhydrostatic Model From 120 to 5 km (3.75 km) During the DYAMOND Winter
title_short Resolution Sensitivity of the GRIST Nonhydrostatic Model From 120 to 5 km (3.75 km) During the DYAMOND Winter
title_sort resolution sensitivity of the grist nonhydrostatic model from 120 to 5 km 3 75 km during the dyamond winter
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002401
work_keys_str_mv AT yizhang resolutionsensitivityofthegristnonhydrostaticmodelfrom120to5km375kmduringthedyamondwinter
AT xiaohanli resolutionsensitivityofthegristnonhydrostaticmodelfrom120to5km375kmduringthedyamondwinter
AT zhuangliu resolutionsensitivityofthegristnonhydrostaticmodelfrom120to5km375kmduringthedyamondwinter
AT xinyaorong resolutionsensitivityofthegristnonhydrostaticmodelfrom120to5km375kmduringthedyamondwinter
AT jianli resolutionsensitivityofthegristnonhydrostaticmodelfrom120to5km375kmduringthedyamondwinter
AT yihuizhou resolutionsensitivityofthegristnonhydrostaticmodelfrom120to5km375kmduringthedyamondwinter
AT suyangchen resolutionsensitivityofthegristnonhydrostaticmodelfrom120to5km375kmduringthedyamondwinter