Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit
Abstract Background The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends all dialysis patients undertake routine screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in high income countries such as Australia. However, we employ a targeted screening approach in our Australian dialysis unit in line with loca...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | BMC Nephrology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03304-0 |
| _version_ | 1797577500315877376 |
|---|---|
| author | Hannah Wallace Craig Nelson Sandra Crikis |
| author_facet | Hannah Wallace Craig Nelson Sandra Crikis |
| author_sort | Hannah Wallace |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends all dialysis patients undertake routine screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in high income countries such as Australia. However, we employ a targeted screening approach in our Australian dialysis unit in line with local and some international guidelines. We analysed our practices to assess the validity of our approach. Methods A retrospective review of new dialysis patients during the period 2012–2018 was undertaken. Patient records were reviewed for basic demographic data, comorbidities, LTBI screening using Quantiferon Gold (QFG), and outcomes, including episodes of active TB, to June 2020. Results 472 patients were included. WHO high risk country of origin patients accounted for 22% (n = 103). 229 patients (48.5%) were screened using QFG. The single main indication for screening was transplantation waitlisting. 34 patients had a positive QFG result. Active tuberculosis developed in two patients during the observation period. Both occurred in the screened cohort, the cases having previously tested negative via QFG at 11 and 16 months, prior to the development of active tuberculosis. No patients in the unscreened cohort developed active tuberculosis during the observation period. WHO high risk country of origin was associated with positive QFG status, odds ratio 10.4 (95% CI 3.3–31.2). Conclusion The data failed to show a benefit from widening of the screening program within our dialysis unit. However, a much larger sample size will be required to confidently assess the impact of the current approach on patient outcomes. Analysis of current screening practices and outcomes across all Australian dialysis services is warranted to assess the risks and benefits of widening the screening practices to include all dialysis patients as recommended by the WHO. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T22:09:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4055c8b2e6be4245b0f4a67af4476b67 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2369 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T22:09:12Z |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Nephrology |
| spelling | doaj.art-4055c8b2e6be4245b0f4a67af4476b672023-11-19T12:39:21ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692023-08-012411710.1186/s12882-023-03304-0Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unitHannah Wallace0Craig Nelson1Sandra Crikis2Department of Nephrology, Western HealthDepartment of Nephrology, Western HealthDepartment of Nephrology, Western HealthAbstract Background The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends all dialysis patients undertake routine screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in high income countries such as Australia. However, we employ a targeted screening approach in our Australian dialysis unit in line with local and some international guidelines. We analysed our practices to assess the validity of our approach. Methods A retrospective review of new dialysis patients during the period 2012–2018 was undertaken. Patient records were reviewed for basic demographic data, comorbidities, LTBI screening using Quantiferon Gold (QFG), and outcomes, including episodes of active TB, to June 2020. Results 472 patients were included. WHO high risk country of origin patients accounted for 22% (n = 103). 229 patients (48.5%) were screened using QFG. The single main indication for screening was transplantation waitlisting. 34 patients had a positive QFG result. Active tuberculosis developed in two patients during the observation period. Both occurred in the screened cohort, the cases having previously tested negative via QFG at 11 and 16 months, prior to the development of active tuberculosis. No patients in the unscreened cohort developed active tuberculosis during the observation period. WHO high risk country of origin was associated with positive QFG status, odds ratio 10.4 (95% CI 3.3–31.2). Conclusion The data failed to show a benefit from widening of the screening program within our dialysis unit. However, a much larger sample size will be required to confidently assess the impact of the current approach on patient outcomes. Analysis of current screening practices and outcomes across all Australian dialysis services is warranted to assess the risks and benefits of widening the screening practices to include all dialysis patients as recommended by the WHO.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03304-0Latent tuberculosis infectionDialysisActive tuberculosisQuantiferon Gold screening |
| spellingShingle | Hannah Wallace Craig Nelson Sandra Crikis Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit BMC Nephrology Latent tuberculosis infection Dialysis Active tuberculosis Quantiferon Gold screening |
| title | Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit |
| title_full | Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit |
| title_fullStr | Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit |
| title_short | Tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit |
| title_sort | tuberculosis screening practices and outcomes in an australian dialysis unit |
| topic | Latent tuberculosis infection Dialysis Active tuberculosis Quantiferon Gold screening |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03304-0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hannahwallace tuberculosisscreeningpracticesandoutcomesinanaustraliandialysisunit AT craignelson tuberculosisscreeningpracticesandoutcomesinanaustraliandialysisunit AT sandracrikis tuberculosisscreeningpracticesandoutcomesinanaustraliandialysisunit |