Direct or indirect composite for restoring permanent first molars affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH): a randomized clinical controlled trial

Abstract Aim This study was undertaken to compare direct composite resin restorations (DCRR) and indirect composite resin restorations (ICRR) for treating permanent first molars affected by MIH in terms of clinical performance. Materials and methods This was a controlled, randomized, clinical split-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdulrhman Hakmi, Mayssoon Dashash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2023-08-01
Series:BDJ Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00165-5
_version_ 1827633389201522688
author Abdulrhman Hakmi
Mayssoon Dashash
author_facet Abdulrhman Hakmi
Mayssoon Dashash
author_sort Abdulrhman Hakmi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim This study was undertaken to compare direct composite resin restorations (DCRR) and indirect composite resin restorations (ICRR) for treating permanent first molars affected by MIH in terms of clinical performance. Materials and methods This was a controlled, randomized, clinical split-mouth study. The studied sample consisted of 40 asymptomatic first permanent hypomineralised mandibular molars in 20 children aged between 7–11 years, these cases were divided randomly into two groups: Group 1 (experimental): 20 first permanent mandibular molars were restored with ICRR, and Group 2 (control): 20 first permanent mandibular molars that were restored with DCRR. The cavity was prepared using a diamond bur on a high-speed handpiece, and the prepared cavity was wiped with cotton moistened with sodium hypochlorite. The composite was applied directly with a total-etch bonding system. In the ICRR group, an impression for the prepared cavity was taken using a silicon-based material, and the restoration was adhesive with self-adhesive resin cement. The child’s satisfaction with each of the two application techniques was assessed through the scale FACES. Restorations were evaluated during follow-up periods (3, 6, and 12 months) according to Modified USHPH criteria. Results The clinical success rate was 90% in the ICRR group versus 85% in the DCRR group after 12 months of follow-up without statistically significant differences (P = 0.218). Children were significantly more satisfied (P = 0.0351) with ICRR than DCRR. Conclusions Both DCRR and ICRR can be considered effective restorations with acceptable clinical performance in the restoration of hypomineralised first permanent molars with an advantage of ICRR in terms of child acceptance of the restoration application technique.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:58:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-406cb7e645dd4662b71bca1b72eb8b3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-807X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:58:55Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BDJ Open
spelling doaj.art-406cb7e645dd4662b71bca1b72eb8b3c2023-11-26T14:02:10ZengNature Publishing GroupBDJ Open2056-807X2023-08-01911810.1038/s41405-023-00165-5Direct or indirect composite for restoring permanent first molars affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH): a randomized clinical controlled trialAbdulrhman Hakmi0Mayssoon Dashash1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Damascus UniversityDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Damascus UniversityAbstract Aim This study was undertaken to compare direct composite resin restorations (DCRR) and indirect composite resin restorations (ICRR) for treating permanent first molars affected by MIH in terms of clinical performance. Materials and methods This was a controlled, randomized, clinical split-mouth study. The studied sample consisted of 40 asymptomatic first permanent hypomineralised mandibular molars in 20 children aged between 7–11 years, these cases were divided randomly into two groups: Group 1 (experimental): 20 first permanent mandibular molars were restored with ICRR, and Group 2 (control): 20 first permanent mandibular molars that were restored with DCRR. The cavity was prepared using a diamond bur on a high-speed handpiece, and the prepared cavity was wiped with cotton moistened with sodium hypochlorite. The composite was applied directly with a total-etch bonding system. In the ICRR group, an impression for the prepared cavity was taken using a silicon-based material, and the restoration was adhesive with self-adhesive resin cement. The child’s satisfaction with each of the two application techniques was assessed through the scale FACES. Restorations were evaluated during follow-up periods (3, 6, and 12 months) according to Modified USHPH criteria. Results The clinical success rate was 90% in the ICRR group versus 85% in the DCRR group after 12 months of follow-up without statistically significant differences (P = 0.218). Children were significantly more satisfied (P = 0.0351) with ICRR than DCRR. Conclusions Both DCRR and ICRR can be considered effective restorations with acceptable clinical performance in the restoration of hypomineralised first permanent molars with an advantage of ICRR in terms of child acceptance of the restoration application technique.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00165-5
spellingShingle Abdulrhman Hakmi
Mayssoon Dashash
Direct or indirect composite for restoring permanent first molars affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH): a randomized clinical controlled trial
BDJ Open
title Direct or indirect composite for restoring permanent first molars affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH): a randomized clinical controlled trial
title_full Direct or indirect composite for restoring permanent first molars affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH): a randomized clinical controlled trial
title_fullStr Direct or indirect composite for restoring permanent first molars affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH): a randomized clinical controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Direct or indirect composite for restoring permanent first molars affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH): a randomized clinical controlled trial
title_short Direct or indirect composite for restoring permanent first molars affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH): a randomized clinical controlled trial
title_sort direct or indirect composite for restoring permanent first molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralisation mih a randomized clinical controlled trial
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00165-5
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulrhmanhakmi directorindirectcompositeforrestoringpermanentfirstmolarsaffectedbymolarincisorhypomineralisationmiharandomizedclinicalcontrolledtrial
AT mayssoondashash directorindirectcompositeforrestoringpermanentfirstmolarsaffectedbymolarincisorhypomineralisationmiharandomizedclinicalcontrolledtrial