Establishing a Working Definition of User Experience for eHealth Interventions of Self-reported User Experience Measures With eHealth Researchers and Adolescents: Scoping Review
BackgroundAcross eHealth intervention studies involving children, adolescents, and their parents, researchers have measured user experience to assist with intervention development, refinement, and evaluation. To date, no widely accepted definitions or measures of user experie...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2021/12/e25012 |
| _version_ | 1797735519482806272 |
|---|---|
| author | Amanda S Newton Sonja March Nicole D Gehring Arlen K Rowe Ashley D Radomski |
| author_facet | Amanda S Newton Sonja March Nicole D Gehring Arlen K Rowe Ashley D Radomski |
| author_sort | Amanda S Newton |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundAcross eHealth intervention studies involving children, adolescents, and their parents, researchers have measured user experience to assist with intervention development, refinement, and evaluation. To date, no widely accepted definitions or measures of user experience exist to support a standardized approach for evaluation and comparison within or across interventions.
ObjectiveWe conduct a scoping review with subsequent Delphi consultation to identify how user experience is defined and measured in eHealth research studies, characterize the measurement tools used, and establish working definitions for domains of user experience that could be used in future eHealth evaluations.
MethodsWe systematically searched electronic databases for published and gray literature available from January 1, 2005, to April 11, 2019. We included studies assessing an eHealth intervention that targeted any health condition and was designed for use by children, adolescents, and their parents. eHealth interventions needed to be web-, computer-, or mobile-based, mediated by the internet with some degree of interactivity. We required studies to report the measurement of user experience as first-person experiences, involving cognitive and behavioral factors reported by intervention users. We appraised the quality of user experience measures in included studies using published criteria: well-established, approaching well-established, promising, or not yet established. We conducted a descriptive analysis of how user experience was defined and measured in each study. Review findings subsequently informed the survey questions used in the Delphi consultations with eHealth researchers and adolescent users for how user experience should be defined and measured.
ResultsOf the 8634 articles screened for eligibility, 129 articles and 1 erratum were included in the review. A total of 30 eHealth researchers and 27 adolescents participated in the Delphi consultations. On the basis of the literature and consultations, we proposed working definitions for 6 main user experience domains: acceptability, satisfaction, credibility, usability, user-reported adherence, and perceived impact. Although most studies incorporated a study-specific measure, we identified 10 well-established measures to quantify 5 of the 6 domains of user experience (all except for self-reported adherence). Our adolescent and researcher participants ranked perceived impact as one of the most important domains of user experience and usability as one of the least important domains. Rankings between adolescents and researchers diverged for other domains.
ConclusionsFindings highlight the various ways in which user experience has been defined and measured across studies and what aspects are most valued by researchers and adolescent users. We propose incorporating the working definitions and available measures of user experience to support consistent evaluation and reporting of outcomes across studies. Future studies can refine the definitions and measurement of user experience, explore how user experience relates to other eHealth outcomes, and inform the design and use of human-centered eHealth interventions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:59:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4081c16ad2c04ee68f78225bc08e4aa0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1438-8871 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:59:20Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-4081c16ad2c04ee68f78225bc08e4aa02023-08-28T19:55:45ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712021-12-012312e2501210.2196/25012Establishing a Working Definition of User Experience for eHealth Interventions of Self-reported User Experience Measures With eHealth Researchers and Adolescents: Scoping ReviewAmanda S Newtonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3020-674XSonja Marchhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8425-7126Nicole D Gehringhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5275-3413Arlen K Rowehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1880-8513Ashley D Radomskihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-3516 BackgroundAcross eHealth intervention studies involving children, adolescents, and their parents, researchers have measured user experience to assist with intervention development, refinement, and evaluation. To date, no widely accepted definitions or measures of user experience exist to support a standardized approach for evaluation and comparison within or across interventions. ObjectiveWe conduct a scoping review with subsequent Delphi consultation to identify how user experience is defined and measured in eHealth research studies, characterize the measurement tools used, and establish working definitions for domains of user experience that could be used in future eHealth evaluations. MethodsWe systematically searched electronic databases for published and gray literature available from January 1, 2005, to April 11, 2019. We included studies assessing an eHealth intervention that targeted any health condition and was designed for use by children, adolescents, and their parents. eHealth interventions needed to be web-, computer-, or mobile-based, mediated by the internet with some degree of interactivity. We required studies to report the measurement of user experience as first-person experiences, involving cognitive and behavioral factors reported by intervention users. We appraised the quality of user experience measures in included studies using published criteria: well-established, approaching well-established, promising, or not yet established. We conducted a descriptive analysis of how user experience was defined and measured in each study. Review findings subsequently informed the survey questions used in the Delphi consultations with eHealth researchers and adolescent users for how user experience should be defined and measured. ResultsOf the 8634 articles screened for eligibility, 129 articles and 1 erratum were included in the review. A total of 30 eHealth researchers and 27 adolescents participated in the Delphi consultations. On the basis of the literature and consultations, we proposed working definitions for 6 main user experience domains: acceptability, satisfaction, credibility, usability, user-reported adherence, and perceived impact. Although most studies incorporated a study-specific measure, we identified 10 well-established measures to quantify 5 of the 6 domains of user experience (all except for self-reported adherence). Our adolescent and researcher participants ranked perceived impact as one of the most important domains of user experience and usability as one of the least important domains. Rankings between adolescents and researchers diverged for other domains. ConclusionsFindings highlight the various ways in which user experience has been defined and measured across studies and what aspects are most valued by researchers and adolescent users. We propose incorporating the working definitions and available measures of user experience to support consistent evaluation and reporting of outcomes across studies. Future studies can refine the definitions and measurement of user experience, explore how user experience relates to other eHealth outcomes, and inform the design and use of human-centered eHealth interventions.https://www.jmir.org/2021/12/e25012 |
| spellingShingle | Amanda S Newton Sonja March Nicole D Gehring Arlen K Rowe Ashley D Radomski Establishing a Working Definition of User Experience for eHealth Interventions of Self-reported User Experience Measures With eHealth Researchers and Adolescents: Scoping Review Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| title | Establishing a Working Definition of User Experience for eHealth Interventions of Self-reported User Experience Measures With eHealth Researchers and Adolescents: Scoping Review |
| title_full | Establishing a Working Definition of User Experience for eHealth Interventions of Self-reported User Experience Measures With eHealth Researchers and Adolescents: Scoping Review |
| title_fullStr | Establishing a Working Definition of User Experience for eHealth Interventions of Self-reported User Experience Measures With eHealth Researchers and Adolescents: Scoping Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Establishing a Working Definition of User Experience for eHealth Interventions of Self-reported User Experience Measures With eHealth Researchers and Adolescents: Scoping Review |
| title_short | Establishing a Working Definition of User Experience for eHealth Interventions of Self-reported User Experience Measures With eHealth Researchers and Adolescents: Scoping Review |
| title_sort | establishing a working definition of user experience for ehealth interventions of self reported user experience measures with ehealth researchers and adolescents scoping review |
| url | https://www.jmir.org/2021/12/e25012 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amandasnewton establishingaworkingdefinitionofuserexperienceforehealthinterventionsofselfreporteduserexperiencemeasureswithehealthresearchersandadolescentsscopingreview AT sonjamarch establishingaworkingdefinitionofuserexperienceforehealthinterventionsofselfreporteduserexperiencemeasureswithehealthresearchersandadolescentsscopingreview AT nicoledgehring establishingaworkingdefinitionofuserexperienceforehealthinterventionsofselfreporteduserexperiencemeasureswithehealthresearchersandadolescentsscopingreview AT arlenkrowe establishingaworkingdefinitionofuserexperienceforehealthinterventionsofselfreporteduserexperiencemeasureswithehealthresearchersandadolescentsscopingreview AT ashleydradomski establishingaworkingdefinitionofuserexperienceforehealthinterventionsofselfreporteduserexperiencemeasureswithehealthresearchersandadolescentsscopingreview |